Literature DB >> 33509173

Service demand for psychological interventions among Australian adults: a population perspective.

Imogen S Page1,2, Claudia Sparti3,4, Damian Santomauro3,4,5, Meredith G Harris3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological interventions (PIs) are good practice treatment for both subthreshold and diagnosed mental disorders. Australia has implemented major reforms to expand the provision of subsidised psychological services for individuals with a diagnosed mental disorder. But there are gaps in knowledge about demand for PIs (i.e., use of and perceived need for PIs) across the population. This study uses nationally representative survey data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing to analyse demand for PIs. It also provides a method for analysing survey data to estimate demand for PIs when new survey data becomes available, along with suggestions to inform future survey development.
METHODS: Nationally representative community survey respondents (n = 8841, 16-85 years) indicated their perceived need for nine types of help for mental health problems in the past 12 months, including three PIs (cognitive behavioural therapy, psychotherapy, and counselling), and whether these needs were unmet, partially met, or fully met. Types of help were grouped as: PIs only; PIs plus other; and other only. Chi-square analyses were used to examine the association between type of intervention, sociodemographic and clinical factors, and type of professional consulted; multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine predictors of type of intervention(s) received.
RESULTS: 7.9% (95%CI: 7.2-8.6) received PIs. Receipt of PIs was positively associated with higher education and consulting a mental health specialist. Twice as many respondents received PIs plus medication as compared to PIs only (4.2% vs. 2.0%). Almost half (45.4, 95%CI 36.5-54.6) incurred out-of-pocket costs for treatment. The most common reason for partially met need for PIs was cost (24.8, 95%CI 17.2-34.3); for unmet need, it was preference for self-management (33.9, 95%CI 21.2-49.5). Perceived unmet need for PIs only (3.1, 95%CI 2.1-4.6) or PIs plus other interventions (5.2, 95%CI 3.9-6.9%) was lower than for other interventions only (22.8, 95%CI 18.7-27.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Continued reforms in Australia means that on-going monitoring of demand for PIs, using nationally representative data, is required. This study provides a baseline for comparison of the long-term effects of these reforms; this comparison may be undertaken using data from the third iteration of Australia's NSMHWB, due for completion in 2021-22.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Health services; Mental disorders; Perceived need; Psychological interventions; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33509173      PMCID: PMC7841756          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06101-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  35 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

2.  Perceived need for mental health treatment in a nationally representative Canadian sample.

Authors:  Jitender Sareen; Brian J Cox; Tracie O Afifi; Ian Clara; Bo Nancy Yu
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  Treatment of anxiety disorders in the Finnish general population.

Authors:  Sinikka Sihvo; Juha Hämäläinen; Olli Kiviruusu; Sami Pirkola; Erkki Isometsä
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Factors associated with use of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Xavier Briffault; David Sapinho; Michael Villamaux; Viviane Kovess
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Social class and the use of professional help for personal problems: 1957 and 1976.

Authors:  R A Kulka; J Veroff; E Douvan
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1979-03

6.  Australian general practice and the meeting of needs for mental health care.

Authors:  G Meadows; T Liaw; P Burgess; I Bobevski; E Fossey
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: methods and key findings.

Authors:  Tim Slade; Amy Johnston; Mark A Oakley Browne; Gavin Andrews; Harvey Whiteford
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.744

8.  Estimating treatment rates for mental disorders in Australia.

Authors:  Harvey A Whiteford; William J Buckingham; Meredith G Harris; Philip M Burgess; Jane E Pirkis; Jan J Barendregt; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in common mental disorders and psychotherapy treatment in the UK between 1991 and 2009.

Authors:  Markus Jokela; G David Batty; Jussi Vahtera; Marko Elovainio; Mika Kivimäki
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Perceived need for mental health care and barriers to care in the Netherlands and Australia.

Authors:  Marijn Prins; Graham Meadows; Irene Bobevski; Annette Graham; Peter Verhaak; Klaas van der Meer; Brenda Penninx; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.328

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inequity in psychiatric healthcare use in Australia.

Authors:  Rubayyat Hashmi; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Gow; Khurshid Alam; Sonja March
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.328

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.