Suparudeewan Thongchan1, Vorapong Phupong2. 1. Placental Related Diseases Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, 10330, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand. 2. Placental Related Diseases Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, 10330, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand. vorapong.p@chula.ac.th.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a major challenge in obstetric and perinatal care. It is the leading cause of neonatal death. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone on latency period in managing preterm labor. The secondary aims were to evaluate the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, time to recurrent uterine contraction, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects. METHODS: This was a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-eight pregnant women with preterm labor, singleton pregnancy, and gestational age of 24-34 weeks were enrolled into the study. The study group received 10 mg of oral dydrogesterone three times per day and the control group received placebo. All pregnant women receivedstandard treatment with tocolytic and antenatal corticosteroids. RESULTS: The median latency periods were not significantly different between the dydrogesterone group (27.5 days) and placebo group (34 days, p = 0.45). Additionally, there were no differences in the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects. However, the time to the recurrence of uterine contractions in participants that had recurrent preterm labor was longer in the dydrogesterone group than in the placebo group (30.6 ± 12.3 vs 13.7 ± 5.0 days, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive treatment with 30 mg of oral dydrogesterone could not prolong latency period in preterm labor when compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Clinical trials registration: NCT03935152 , registered on May 2,2019).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is a major challenge in obstetric and perinatal care. It is the leading cause of neonatal death. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone on latency period in managing preterm labor. The secondary aims were to evaluate the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, time to recurrent uterine contraction, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects. METHODS: This was a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-eight pregnant women with preterm labor, singleton pregnancy, and gestational age of 24-34 weeks were enrolled into the study. The study group received 10 mg of oral dydrogesterone three times per day and the control group received placebo. All pregnant women received standard treatment with tocolytic and antenatal corticosteroids. RESULTS: The median latency periods were not significantly different between the dydrogesterone group (27.5 days) and placebo group (34 days, p = 0.45). Additionally, there were no differences in the gestational age at delivery, percentage of preterm delivery before 34 weeks and 37 weeks, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, compliance and side effects. However, the time to the recurrence of uterine contractions in participants that had recurrent preterm labor was longer in the dydrogesterone group than in the placebo group (30.6 ± 12.3 vs 13.7 ± 5.0 days, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive treatment with 30 mg of oral dydrogesterone could not prolong latency period in preterm labor when compared to placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (Clinical trials registration: NCT03935152 , registered on May 2,2019).
Authors: Ahizechukwu C Eke; Tina Chalaan; Ghadear Shukr; George U Eleje; Charles I Okafor Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Nicole K Ruddock; Shao-Qing Shi; Sangeeta Jain; Gradie Moore; Gary D V Hankins; Roberto Romero; Robert E Garfield Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: M Palacio; T Cobo; E Antolín; M Ramirez; F Cabrera; F Mozo de Rosales; J L Bartha; M Juan; A Martí; D Oros; À Rodríguez; E Scazzocchio; J M Olivares; S Varea; J Ríos; E Gratacós Journal: BJOG Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Dan Hogan; Yue Chu; Jamie Perin; Jun Zhu; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321