M Ryan1, M O'Neill1, S M O'Neill2, B Clyne1,3, M Bell4, A Casey4, B Leen5, S M Smith3. 1. The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), City Gate, Mahon, Cork, T12 Y2XT, Ireland. 2. The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), City Gate, Mahon, Cork, T12 Y2XT, Ireland. soneill@hiqa.ie. 3. HRB Centre for Primary Care Research and Department of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. 4. The Deteriorating Patient Recognition and Response Improvement Programme (DPIP), Clinical Design and Innovation, Health Service Executive, Dr. Steeven's Hospital, Steevens' Lane, D08W2A8, Dublin, Ireland. 5. Regional Librarian, Health Service Executive South, Kilkenny, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early warning systems (EWSs) are used to assist clinical judgment in the detection of acute deterioration to avoid or reduce adverse events including unanticipated cardiopulmonary arrest, admission to the intensive care unit and death. Sometimes healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not trigger the alarm and escalate for help according to the EWS protocol and it is unclear why this is the case. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to answer the question 'why do HCPs fail to escalate care according to EWS protocols?' The findings will inform the update of the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) National Clinical Guideline No. 1 Irish National Early Warning System (INEWS). METHODS: A systematic search of the published and grey literature was conducted (until February 2018). Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently using standardised data extraction forms and quality appraisal tools. A thematic synthesis was conducted by two reviewers of the qualitative studies included and categorised into the barriers and facilitators of escalation. GRADE CERQual was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Eighteen studies incorporating a variety of HCPs across seven countries were included. The barriers and facilitators to the escalation of care according to EWS protocols were developed into five overarching themes: Governance, Rapid Response Team (RRT) Response, Professional Boundaries, Clinical Experience, and EWS parameters. Barriers to escalation included: Lack of Standardisation, Resources, Lack of accountability, RRT behaviours, Fear, Hierarchy, Increased Conflict, Over confidence, Lack of confidence, and Patient variability. Facilitators included: Accountability, Standardisation, Resources, RRT behaviours, Expertise, Additional support, License to escalate, Bridge across boundaries, Clinical confidence, empowerment, Clinical judgment, and a tool for detecting deterioration. These are all individual yet inter-related barriers and facilitators to escalation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis provide insight into the real world experience of HCPs when using EWSs. This in turn has the potential to inform policy-makers and HCPs as well as hospital management about emergency response system-related issues in practice and the changes needed to address barriers and facilitators and improve patient safety and quality of care.
BACKGROUND: Early warning systems (EWSs) are used to assist clinical judgment in the detection of acute deterioration to avoid or reduce adverse events including unanticipated cardiopulmonary arrest, admission to the intensive care unit and death. Sometimes healthcare professionals (HCPs) do not trigger the alarm and escalate for help according to the EWS protocol and it is unclear why this is the case. The aim of this qualitative evidence synthesis was to answer the question 'why do HCPs fail to escalate care according to EWS protocols?' The findings will inform the update of the National Clinical Effectiveness Committee (NCEC) National Clinical Guideline No. 1 Irish National Early Warning System (INEWS). METHODS: A systematic search of the published and grey literature was conducted (until February 2018). Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted by two reviewers independently using standardised data extraction forms and quality appraisal tools. A thematic synthesis was conducted by two reviewers of the qualitative studies included and categorised into the barriers and facilitators of escalation. GRADE CERQual was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Eighteen studies incorporating a variety of HCPs across seven countries were included. The barriers and facilitators to the escalation of care according to EWS protocols were developed into five overarching themes: Governance, Rapid Response Team (RRT) Response, Professional Boundaries, Clinical Experience, and EWS parameters. Barriers to escalation included: Lack of Standardisation, Resources, Lack of accountability, RRT behaviours, Fear, Hierarchy, Increased Conflict, Over confidence, Lack of confidence, and Patient variability. Facilitators included: Accountability, Standardisation, Resources, RRT behaviours, Expertise, Additional support, License to escalate, Bridge across boundaries, Clinical confidence, empowerment, Clinical judgment, and a tool for detecting deterioration. These are all individual yet inter-related barriers and facilitators to escalation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis provide insight into the real world experience of HCPs when using EWSs. This in turn has the potential to inform policy-makers and HCPs as well as hospital management about emergency response system-related issues in practice and the changes needed to address barriers and facilitators and improve patient safety and quality of care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barriers; Early warning system; Facilitators; Failure to escalate; Thematic analysis
Authors: Sok Ying Liaw; Lai Fun Wong; Sophia Bee Leng Ang; Jasmine Tze Yin Ho; Chiang Siau; Emily Neo Kim Ang Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Jonathan Bannard-Smith; Geoffrey K Lighthall; Christian P Subbe; Lesley Durham; John Welch; Rinaldo Bellomo; Daryl A Jones Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Andrea L Benin; Christopher P Borgstrom; Grace Y Jenq; Sarah A Roumanis; Leora I Horwitz Journal: Postgrad Med J Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Wei Ling Chua; Min Ting Alicia See; Helena Legio-Quigley; Daryl Jones; Augustine Tee; Sok Ying Liaw Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Allison Tong; Kate Flemming; Elizabeth McInnes; Sandy Oliver; Jonathan Craig Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 4.615