Literature DB >> 33508782

25 Years of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion: Historical Perspective and Development.

Carl Foster, Daniel Boullosa, Michael McGuigan, Andrea Fusco, Cristina Cortis, Blaine E Arney, Bo Orton, Christopher Dodge, Salvador Jaime, Kim Radtke, Teun van Erp, Jos J de Koning, Daniel Bok, Jose A Rodriguez-Marroyo, John P Porcari.   

Abstract

The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) method was developed 25 years ago as a modification of the Borg concept of rating of perceived exertion (RPE), designed to estimate the intensity of an entire training session. It appears to be well accepted as a marker of the internal training load. Early studies demonstrated that sRPE correlated well with objective measures of internal training load, such as the percentage of heart rate reserve and blood lactate concentration. It has been shown to be useful in a wide variety of exercise activities ranging from aerobic to resistance to games. It has also been shown to be useful in populations ranging from patients to elite athletes. The sRPE is a reasonable measure of the average RPE acquired across an exercise session. Originally designed to be acquired ∼30 minutes after a training bout to prevent the terminal elements of an exercise session from unduly influencing the rating, sRPE has been shown to be temporally robust across periods ranging from 1 minute to 14 days following an exercise session. Within the training impulse concept, sRPE, or other indices derived from sRPE, has been shown to be able to account for both positive and negative training outcomes and has contributed to our understanding of how training is periodized to optimize training outcomes and to understand maladaptations such as overtraining syndrome. The sRPE as a method of monitoring training has the advantage of extreme simplicity. While it is not ideal for the precise recording of the details of the external training load, it has large advantages relative to evaluating the internal training load.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RPE; fitness-fatigue model; training dose; training intensity; training monitoring

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33508782     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  23 in total

1.  Training Load, Heart Rate Variability, Direct Current Potential and Elite Long Jump Performance Prior and during the 2016 Olympic Games.

Authors:  Joseph Coyne; Aaron Coutts; Robert Newton; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Can high-intensity interval training and small-sided games be effective for improving physical fitness after detraining? A parallel study design in youth male soccer players.

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Yusuf Soylu; Ersan Arslan; Bulent Kilit; Joel Garrett; Daniel van den Hoek; Georgian Badicu; Ana Filipa Silva
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Are Measurement Instruments Responsive to Assess Acute Responses to Load in High-Level Youth Soccer Players?

Authors:  Ludwig Ruf; Barry Drust; Paul Ehmann; Sabrina Skorski; Tim Meyer
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-07-01

4.  Indoor Cycling Energy Expenditure: Does Sequence Matter?

Authors:  Cristina Cortis; Andrea Fusco; Mitchell Cook; Scott T Doberstein; Cordial Gillette; John P Porcari; Carl Foster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Physical and Physiological Predictors of FRAN CrossFit® WOD Athlete's Performance.

Authors:  Luis Leitão; Marcelo Dias; Yuri Campos; João Guilherme Vieira; Leandro Sant'Ana; Luiz Guilherme Telles; Carlos Tavares; Mauro Mazini; Jefferson Novaes; Jeferson Vianna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Summated Hazard Score as a Powerful Predictor of Fatigue in Relation to Pacing Strategy.

Authors:  Sylvia Binkley; Carl Foster; Cristina Cortis; Jos J de Koning; Christopher Dodge; Scott T Doberstein; Andrea Fusco; Salvador J Jaime; John P Porcari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Periodization and Programming for Individual 400 m Medley Swimmers.

Authors:  Francisco Hermosilla; José M González-Rave; José Antonio Del Castillo; David B Pyne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Training Load Monitoring Considerations for Female Gaelic Team Sports: From Theory to Practice.

Authors:  John D Duggan; Jeremy A Moody; Paul J Byrne; Stephen-Mark Cooper; Lisa Ryan
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-05

9.  Effect of Player Role and Competition Level on Player Demands in Basketball.

Authors:  Jodie Palmer; Daniel Wundersitz; Rodrigo Bini; Michael Kingsley
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-08

10.  Workload Accomplished in Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Katrina L Schultz; Carl Foster; Kimberley Radtke; Susan Bramwell; Cristina Cortis; Andrea Fusco; John P Porcari
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.