Literature DB >> 33508372

Proton Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma: Mature Results From a Bicentric Study.

Daniel J Indelicato1, Myrsini Ioakeim-Ioannidou2, Julie A Bradley3, Raymond B Mailhot-Vega3, Christopher G Morris3, Nancy J Tarbell2, Torunn Yock2, Shannon M MacDonald2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2000 and 2019, 386 children with nonmetastatic grade 2/3 intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at 1 of 2 academic institutions. Median age at treatment was 3.8 years (range, 0.7-21.3); 56% were male. Most (72%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as World Health Organization grade 3 (65%). Eighty-five percent had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiation therapy; 30% received chemotherapy. Median radiation dose was 55.8 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) (range, 50.4-59.4).
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 0.4-16.7). The 7-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 77.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.9%-81.5%), 63.8% (95% CI, 58.0%-68.8%), and 82.2% (95% CI, 77.2%-86.3%), respectively. Subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (59% vs 80%; P < .005), progression-free survival (48% vs 66%; P < .001), and overall survival (70% vs 84%; P < .05). Male sex was associated with inferior progression-free (60% vs 69%; P < .05) and overall survival (76% vs 89%; P < .05). Posterior fossa tumor site was also associated with inferior progression-free (59% vs 74%; P < .05) and overall survival (79% vs 89%; P < .01). Twenty-one patients (5.4%) required hearing aids; of these, 13 received cisplatin, including the 3 with bilateral hearing loss. Forty-five patients (11.7%) required hormone replacement, typically growth hormone (38/45). The cumulative incidence of grade 2+ brain stem toxicity was 4% and occurred more often in patients who received >54 GyRBE. Two patients (0.5%) died of brain stem necrosis. The second-malignancy rate was 0.8%.
CONCLUSION: Proton therapy offers disease control commensurate with modern photon therapy without unexpected toxicity. The high rate of long-term survival justifies efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this young population. Independent of radiation modality, this large series confirms extent of resection as the most important modifiable factor for survival.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33508372     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Protons for pediatric ependymoma: Where are we now?

Authors:  Bernadine R Donahue; Shannon MacDonald
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.029

2.  Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors.

Authors:  Rituraj Upadhyay; Kaiping Liao; David R Grosshans; Susan L McGovern; Mary Frances McAleer; Wafik Zaky; Murali M Chintagumpala; Anita Mahajan; Debra Nana Yeboa; Arnold C Paulino
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

3.  No question: Proton therapy is safe.

Authors:  Daniel J Indelicato
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

4.  Effect of Postoperative Radiation Therapy Timing on Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Ependymoma.

Authors:  Sunny Shah; Kevin Gates; Chase Mallory; Muni Rubens; Ossama M Maher; Toba N Niazi; Ziad Khatib; Rupesh Kotecha; Minesh P Mehta; Matthew D Hall
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Evaluation of dose, volume, and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study.

Authors:  Sarah Peters; Julien Merta; Laura Schmidt; Danny Jazmati; Paul-Heinz Kramer; Cristoph Blase; Stephan Tippelt; Gudrun Fleischhack; Annika Stock; Brigitte Bison; Stefan Rutkowski; Torsten Pietsch; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.029

Review 6.  Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates.

Authors:  Roberta Rudà; Francesco Bruno; Alessia Pellerino; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.945

Review 7.  Childhood Malignant Brain Tumors: Balancing the Bench and Bedside.

Authors:  Colin Thorbinson; John-Paul Kilday
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Reevaluating surgery and re-irradiation for locally recurrent pediatric ependymoma-a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  David Y Mak; Normand Laperriere; Vijay Ramaswamy; Eric Bouffet; Jeffrey C Murray; Rene Y McNall-Knapp; Kevin Bielamowicz; Arnold C Paulino; Wafik Zaky; Susan L McGovern; M Fatih Okcu; Uri Tabori; Doaa Atwi; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Derek S Tsang; Abhishek Bavle
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-11-08

9.  Polish Multi-Institutional Study of Children with Ependymoma-Clinical Practice Outcomes in the Light of Prospective Trials.

Authors:  Aleksandra Napieralska; Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz; Weronika Stolpa; Ewa Pawłowska; Małgorzata A Krawczyk; Katarzyna Konat-Bąska; Aneta Kaczorowska; Arkadiusz Brąszewski; Maciej Harat
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.