Alice H Aubert1, Max N D Friedrich1,2. 1. Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland. 2. Ranas Ltd, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Standardized face-to-face interviews are widely used in low and middle-income countries to collect data for social science and health research. Such interviews can be long and tedious. In an attempt to improve the respondents' experience of interviews, we developed a concept of gamified interview format by including a game element. Gamification is reported to increase engagement in tasks, but results from rigorously developed research are equivocal, and a theory of gamification is still needed. MATERIALS & METHODS: We evaluated the proposed gamification with a randomized controlled trial based on self-determination theory, specifically on the basic psychological needs theory. In total, 1266 respondents were interviewed. Single and multiple mediation analyses were used to understand the effects of the gamified interview format. RESULTS: Our evaluation showed that the gamification we had developed did not improve the outcome, the experience of the interview reported by respondent. The effect of the gamified interview format depended on the ability of respondents: gamification can be counterproductive if it overburdens the respondents. However, the basic psychological needs theory explained the mechanisms of action of gamification well: feeling competent and related to others improved the reported experience of the interview. CONCLUSION: We emphasize the need to develop context-specific gamification and invite researchers to conduct equivalently rigorous evaluations of gamification in future studies.
OBJECTIVE: Standardized face-to-face interviews are widely used in low and middle-income countries to collect data for social science and health research. Such interviews can be long and tedious. In an attempt to improve the respondents' experience of interviews, we developed a concept of gamified interview format by including a game element. Gamification is reported to increase engagement in tasks, but results from rigorously developed research are equivocal, and a theory of gamification is still needed. MATERIALS & METHODS: We evaluated the proposed gamification with a randomized controlled trial based on self-determination theory, specifically on the basic psychological needs theory. In total, 1266 respondents were interviewed. Single and multiple mediation analyses were used to understand the effects of the gamified interview format. RESULTS: Our evaluation showed that the gamification we had developed did not improve the outcome, the experience of the interview reported by respondent. The effect of the gamified interview format depended on the ability of respondents: gamification can be counterproductive if it overburdens the respondents. However, the basic psychological needs theory explained the mechanisms of action of gamification well: feeling competent and related to others improved the reported experience of the interview. CONCLUSION: We emphasize the need to develop context-specific gamification and invite researchers to conduct equivalently rigorous evaluations of gamification in future studies.
Authors: Max Friedrich; Tejaswi Balasundaram; Arundati Muralidharan; V R Raman; Hans-Joachim Mosler Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Sophie J S Pascoe; James R Hargreaves; Lisa F Langhaug; Richard J Hayes; Frances M Cowan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E A Edwards; J Lumsden; C Rivas; L Steed; L A Edwards; A Thiyagarajan; R Sohanpal; H Caton; C J Griffiths; M R Munafò; S Taylor; R T Walton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jim Lumsden; Elizabeth A Edwards; Natalia S Lawrence; David Coyle; Marcus R Munafò Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Daniel Johnson; Sebastian Deterding; Kerri-Ann Kuhn; Aleksandra Staneva; Stoyan Stoyanov; Leanne Hides Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2016-11-02
Authors: Gudrun Sproesser; Rachana Bhangaokar; Matthew B Ruby; Claude Fischler; Paul Rozin; Harald T Schupp; Britta Renner Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2022-08-29