Literature DB >> 33507690

Cardiac, Hepatic and Renal Dysfunction and IL-18 Polymorphism in Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients.

Govand Qader1, Mukhlis Aali1, Shukur W Smail1,2, Kazhan Mahmood3, Bestoon Hasan4, Karwan M-Amen2,5, Dlzar Bayz Rahman6, Fikry A Qadir1, Dara K Mohammad7,8, Hastyar H Najmuldeen9,10, Fryad Majeed Rahman9, Seepal Ibrahim Ahmad11, Nergz S Salih1, Zainab M Khdhr1, Bushra A Mohammed1, Asuda M Majeed1, Xanda M Hasan1, Bushra H Khidhir1, Eman S Muhammad1, Bahar A Muhamadsalih12, Simav K Hasan12, Aram J Hamad12, Zahra K Esmail12, Chra M Ismael12, Shan M Husaen12, Chiavan A Abdulla12, Bashdar M Hussen13, Zjwan Housein14, Mudhir Shekha1, Abbas Salihi1,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to determine the alterations in the serum levels of tumor markers used to evaluate cardiac, renal and liver function, and detect the interleukin (IL)-18 rs1946518 polymorphism in breast (BC), colorectal (CRC) and prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 65 female BC, 116 CRC, 79 PCa and 88 myocardial infarction (MI) patients, and 110 healthy individuals to determine the concentration of tumor and cardiac markers. Furthermore, the IL-18 rs1946518 polymorphism was assessed using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR.
RESULTS: The serum levels of the tumor markers cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) were significantly increased in cancer patients compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, the activity of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and creatine kinase‑myocardial band (CK-MB) was enhanced in MI patients, however, their activity was unchanged in cancer patients. The activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the serum concentration of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and urea were markedly elevated in CRC and PCa patients, respectively, compared with the control group. Although, no significant differences were observed in the -607 C/A polymorphism and allele frequency of IL-18 among BC, CRC patients and healthy individuals, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.75 for both C and A allele in BC patients. Therefore, the -607 C/A polymorphism could be considered as a risk factor for BC.
CONCLUSION: The aforementioned results suggested that tumor markers could be considered as excellent biomarkers for the early detection of BC, CRC and PCa, whereas the concentration of liver enzymes could serve as an alternative indicator for the diagnosis of CRC and PCa. Additionally, the rs1946518 polymorphism in the IL-18 gene could be considered as a risk factor for the occurrence of BC, CRC and PCa.<br />.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate Cancer; Tumor markers; breast cancer; colorectal cancer; interleukin-18 polymorphism

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507690      PMCID: PMC8184168          DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of death in high-income countries and the second leading cause in low- and middle-income countries. It has been estimated that approximately 1 to 4 deaths in the United States are attributed to cancer (Brown et al., 2012). Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor and foremost cause of death in women globally (Youlden et al., 2014). Likewise, prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common tumors in men, while colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered the third most commonly diagnosed type of cancer worldwide, with approximately 1.23 million new cases each year (Ning et al., 2018)). Nowadays, several biomarkers are available for the early detection and progressive stages of different types of cancer using blood samples, including total the prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) for the diagnosis of PCa, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for gastrointestinal, breast and lung cancer, the cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) for ovarian cancer, the carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) for CRC and pancreatic cancer, and the CA 15-3 for BC (Diamandis, 2014). Since no cure is available for many types of cancer, patients eventually progressing to metastatic cancer, which affects other organs such as the liver, kidney, heart and lungs, with fatal consequences for the patients (Arends et al., 2017). Such organ failure may cause more deaths than cancer itself (Frères et al., 2018). Therefore, biomarkers are widely used to detect cancer at an early stage and have been extensively investigated in several studies (Cao and Wang, 2012). Furthermore, the risk for cardiac diseases has been regarded as an important barrier for cancer therapies, as their mortality rate is higher compared with that of cancer (Frères et al., 2018). For the majority of tumors, the cancer cell metastasis from the primary tumor to surrounding tissues and to distant vital organs is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths, accounting for about 90% of cancer cases (Akinyemiju et al., 2018). Therefore, the early detection of circulating biomarkers could be considered as a highly valuable tool for cancer treatment (Marcuello et al., 2019). Interleukin (IL)-18, a member of the IL-1 family, activates the immune cells involved in both innate and adaptive immune responses, thus increasing the immune defense against tumor cells. It has been reported that IL-18 exerts a significant role in tumor progression in several types of cancer. The IL-18 gene expression and serum levels have been shown to be elevated in blood of collected from metastatic patients compared with patients without metastasis and healthy individuals (Park et al., 2007). Additionally, it has been suggested that IL-18 modulates the immune system for attacking cancer cells via inhibiting tumor growth and angiogenesis in ovarian cancer, attenuating cell proliferation and invasion ability in BC, and increasing the cytotoxic effects of the chemotherapeutic drugs on colon malignant cells (Jia et al., 2016). Several studies have demonstrated the association between various types of cancer and polymorphisms on the IL-18 gene, despite the chronic inflammatory status of cancer patients (Hosseini-Baraftabi et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019). A previous study from our lab, has revealed that the number of patients with cancer is increasing in the Kurdistan region of Iraq (Qader et al., 2020), however, gaps still exists between Kurdistan and the rest of the world in terms of number and quality of cancer-related publications. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify and determine the changes in the levels of the most effective and appropriate biomarkers used for the early diagnosis of different types of cancer and cardiac diseases, and to further investigate the possible association between a polymorphism at position -607 C/A (rs1946518) of the IL-18 gene and BC, CRC and PCa Kurdish patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients A total of 458 individuals were enrolled in the current study. Among them, 65 were diagnosed with BC, 116 with CRC, 79 with PCa and 88 with myocardial infarction (MI). Concurrently, 110 healthy volunteers were also included in the study. Participants were recruited from Erbil city hospitals. The present study was authorized and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the College of Science, Salahaddin University, Erbil. All patients and healthy volunteers provided written informed consent for the publication of their data in the current study. Blood collection Blood samples were obtained by phlebotomy under aseptic conditions. Venous blood was aspirated with a 5 ml syringe, collected in both plain and anticoagulant tubes, and maintained at room temperature. Subsequently, serum was separated from whole blood, placed in microcentrifuge tubes, and stored in a freezer at -60°C until used. Blood in the anticoagulant tubes was used for subsequent molecular diagnostic analyses based on PCR. Estimation of tumor and cardiac markers The concentration of CA 15-3, CEA, CA 19-9, TPSA, hs-cTnT, and CK-MB were determined using the Cobas e411 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and a ready-to-use reagent kit in individual cassettes, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This detection method relies on the measurement of immunoreactivity utilizing electrochemiluminescence. Renal and liver function tests The serum concentration of creatinine and urea, as well as the activity of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured using the Bt35i and BioLIS 50i automated clinical analyzers (Tokyo Boeki Medisys Inc.). This detection method relies on the use of a spectrophotometer. Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood, as previously described (Hashemi et al., 2017). The following primer sequences were used for amplifying the IL-18 polymorphism: forward outer primer, 5’-CCTACAATGTTACAACACTTAAAAT-3’ and reverse outer primer, 5’-ATAAGCCCTAAATATATGTATCCTTA-3’; and forward inner primer, 5’- GATACCATCATTAGAATTTTGTG-3’ and reverse inner primer, 5’- GCAGAAAGTGTAAAAATTATCAA-3’. The genotyping of the IL-18 -607 C/A polymorphism was assessed using the tetra-primer ARMS (T-ARMS) method, as previously described (Taheri et al., 2012). Furthermore, PCR was performed using a commercially available PCR premix (Genet Bio), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 20 µl containing 10 µl premix solution, 3 µl DNA template (concentration, ~100 ng/µl), 1 µl from each primer (10 µM) and 3 µl nuclease-free water. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles, each consisting of 30 sec at 95°C (denaturation), 20 sec at 54°C (annealing), and 30 sec at 72°C (extension), with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel supplemented with 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide and were then visualized under ultraviolet light. Product sizes were 208 bp for the C allele, 278 bp for the A allele, and 440 bp for the control band. Statistical analysis The statistical analysis for the serological data and the comparison between the tumor and control groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (P<0.05). Cardiac function data were compared with those of the control and MI groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Normality tests, namely D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus, Shapiro-Wilk and KS normality tests, were carried out for all data. The area under the curves (AUC) was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. All values were expressed as median and range, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses, calculations and graphs were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Results

Tumor markers between cancer patients and healthy controls The serum levels of CA15-3, CA19-9 and CEA in BC and CRC, and TPSA in PCa patients (P<0.001) were significantly increased compared with those noted to healthy individuals (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison between Serum Levels of Ca15-3 (U/ml) and CEA (ng/mL), Ca19-9 (U/ml) and CEA (ng/ml) and TSPA (U/ml) in Control, Breast, Colorectal and Prostate Cancer Patients

ControlBCCRCPCa
Ca15-319.47 (13.38-24.07)52.63 (35.28,130.8)***
CEA1.57 (0.97-2.13)15.6 (6.74-52.75)***
Ca19-95.77 (1.79-6.41)19.37(9.18-46.16)***
CEA1.105 (0.57-1.59)3.1 (1.88-22)***
TPSA1.26 (0.62-2.98)64.01 (18.93-165.7)***

**, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001

Levels of cardiac markers between healthy controls, and cancer and MI patients The activity of hs-cTnT (ng/ml) and CK-MB was notably elevated in MI patients compared with healthy controls, and BC, CRC and PCa patients (P<0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in hs-cTnT and CK-MB levels between BC, CRC and PCa patients, and healthy volunteers (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison between Serum Levels of hs-TnT (ng/ml) and CK-MB (IU) in Control, MI, Breast, Colorectal and Prostate Cancer Patients

ControlMIBCCRCPCa
hs-TnT0.005 (0.004-0.008)***0.034 (0.02-0.086)0.003 (0.003-0.003)***0.003 (0.003,0.0055) ***0.003 (0.003-0.0055)***
CK-MB16.3 (14, 18.83)**38.4 (28.7, 80.35)22.65 (14.73, 26.38)**15.14 (7.21-43.91)***6.82 (5.86, 12.3)***

**, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001

Liver and renal function tests between healthy controls and cancer patients The activity of AST, ALT and ALP, and the serum concentration of urea and creatinine were unchanged in BC patients, whereas ALP was significantly increased in CRC patients compared with healthy individuals (P<0.001). Furthermore, the activity of AST and ALT, and urea serum levels were significantly increased in PCa patients compared with the control group (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison between Renal and Liver Function Tests in Control, Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients

ControlBCCRCPCa
AST21.55 (15.8, 28.83)21 (17,29. 5)24 (19, 35)27.9 (22.53,39.25)*
ALT17.1 (11.33, 31.75)15 (9.5, 26)18 (12, 29.3)16.25 (11.38, 29.05)
ALP89.9 (65.4, 112)84 (35.44, 202.2)198 (118.4, 269)***291 (224,733.4)***
Urea34.15 (28.8, 39.6)36.46 (32.5, 41)34 (26.8, 39)44 (37, 61)**
Crtn0.85 (0.6, 1.23)0.89 (0.76, 1.11)0.87 (0.75, 1.05)1.08 (0.81, 1.56)

*, represents P value 0.05; **, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001

Selection of the biomarkers As shown in Figure 1, CEA and CA15-3 were the most efficient biomarkers for the early detection of BC, with AUC values of 1 and 0.97, respectively. In addition, CA 19-9, CEA and ALP were the most efficient biomarkers for CRC (AUC, 0.87, 0.86 and 0.85, respectively), and TSPA and ALP for PCa (AUC, 0.99 and 0.91, respectively). Furthermore, urea, creatinine and AST were considered as good indicators for detecting PCa, with AUC values of 0.75, 0.7 and 0.76, respectively.
Figure 1

ROC Curve for the Level of Serum Tumour Markers, Liver and Renal Function Tests in BC, CRC and PCa Patients. A, B, C represent Ca15-3, CEA, liver and renal function tests in BC patients, respectively. D, E, F represent Ca19-9, CEA, liver and renal function tests in CRC patients, respectively. G, H, I represent TPSA, liver and renal function tests in PCa patients, respectively

Genotypes and allele distribution of the IL-18 polymorphism The distributions of the genotype and allele frequencies of the IL18-607 C/A polymorphism in patients and healthy groups are shown in Table 4. The results showed that 38.88% of BC patients exhibited the homozygous CC genotype, 50% the heterozygous CA genotype and 11.22% the homozygous AA genotype. In addition, 18 and 82% of CRC patients presented the homozygous CC and heterozygous CA genotype, respectively. The genotype rates of the -607 C/A polymorphism in healthy individuals were 46, 54 and 0.0% for CC, CA and AA genotype, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of the -607 C/A polymorphism of the IL-18 gene among BC and CRC patients, and healthy individuals (P>0.05). As shown in Table 4, the C allele frequency was 61% in BC and 59% in CRC patients, while the A allele frequency was 39 and 41%, respectively. In healthy individuals, the C and A allele frequencies were 73 and 27%, respectively.
Table 4

The Genotypes and Allele Distribution of IL-18 Polymorphism in Control, Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients

PolymorphismControlBCCRCPCa
%OR95% ClP value%OR95% ClP value%OR95% ClP value
CC4638.881--181--24.11-
CA54501.130.27-4.640.87823.980.63-24.740.13161.10.460.2 to 1.080.092
AA011.2250.2-122.80.18----14.80.030.002 to 0.630.001
AA+CA5461.221.380.34-5.510.65----75.90.370.16 to 0.860.024
C73611.750.61-5.010.29591.90.59-6.160.2854.60.450.248 to 0.80.006
A27394145.4
There were no significant differences in the allele frequency between patients and healthy controls (P>0.05). Additionally, the odds ratio (OR) value was 1.75 for both C and A allele in BC patients. Therefore, the -607 C/A polymorphism could be considered as a risk factor for BC. Furthermore, the frequency rates of homozygous CC, heterozygous CA and homozygous AA genotypes in BC and PCa patients were 24.1, 61.1 and 14.8%, respectively. In addition, the. CC and CA genotype frequency rates were 46 and 54% in healthy subjects, respectively, whereas the AA genotype was not detected. Furthermore, the IL18 -607 C/A AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk for PCa compared with the IL18 -607 C/A CC genotype [P=0.001, OR=0.033, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.002-0.633)]. Additionally, a significant association was identified for the recessive model (CC vs. AA/CA: OR=0.372, 95% CI=0.161-0.858, P=0.024). However, no significant association was observed in the heterozygote model (CA vs CC: OR=0.462, 95% CI=0.197-1.081, P=0.092). Finally, the frequency rate of the carrier for the mutant A allele was significantly higher in PCa patients compared with healthy volunteers, and a statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency rates between the two IL-18 alleles (C vs A: OR=0.445, 95% CI=0.248-0.796, P=0.006). ROC Curve for the Level of Serum Tumour Markers, Liver and Renal Function Tests in BC, CRC and PCa Patients. A, B, C represent Ca15-3, CEA, liver and renal function tests in BC patients, respectively. D, E, F represent Ca19-9, CEA, liver and renal function tests in CRC patients, respectively. G, H, I represent TPSA, liver and renal function tests in PCa patients, respectively Comparison between Serum Levels of Ca15-3 (U/ml) and CEA (ng/mL), Ca19-9 (U/ml) and CEA (ng/ml) and TSPA (U/ml) in Control, Breast, Colorectal and Prostate Cancer Patients **, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001 Comparison between Serum Levels of hs-TnT (ng/ml) and CK-MB (IU) in Control, MI, Breast, Colorectal and Prostate Cancer Patients **, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001 Comparison between Renal and Liver Function Tests in Control, Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients *, represents P value 0.05; **, represents P value 0.01; ***, represents P value 0.001 The Genotypes and Allele Distribution of IL-18 Polymorphism in Control, Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients

Discussion

The results of the present study indicated that the tumor markers CA 15-3, CA 19-9 and TPSA were the best biomarkers for detecting BC, CRC and PCa, respectively. In addition, the results revealed that CEA could serve as an excellent general tumor biomarker, and especially for CRC. Consistent with our findings, a meta-analysis from China confirmed the association between the CA 15-3 serum levels with BC susceptibility (Fu and Li, 2016). On the other hand, it has been reported that the serum levels of the CA15-3 and CEA biomarkers may be used for acquiring sufficient information about the disease and its progression status, when tissue specimens are not available (Li et al., 2019). Furthermore, a previous study has suggested that the increased preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels are considered as a prognostic factor for CRC (Shin et al., 2019). Additionally, CEA is positively correlated with CRC stage and patient’s age, while its levels are significantly increased in male patients (Ng et al., 2017). A recent study has suggested that initial patient evaluation and treatment decisions are based on a risk stratification scheme that incorporates the three most important prognostic biomarkers at diagnosis: the clinical stage, biopsy Gleason grade/score, and serum PSA (Gaudreau et al., 2016). PSA is the most widely used biomarker for the early detection of PCa. Other researchers have suggested that CA15-3 alone is not sufficient for the early detection of BC and its nodal status and grade, however, they accept that it may be considered as a pre-diagnostic marker for more aggressive phenotypes (Kazarian et al., 2017). Morita et al demonstrated that there was no difference in the diagnostic value of CA 19-9 and CEA regarding the early detection of CRC. In addition, they hypothesized that CA 19-9 could not be used to predict the prognosis or relapse of CRC. Correspondingly, the authors showed that the sensitivity of serum CA19-9 was low, therefore, they did not recommend the addition of serum CA19-9 biomarker to the current standard surveillance strategies (Okamura et al., 2017). PSA has several limitations as a biomarker, as it is not able to well distinguish between prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia or between indolent and aggressive prostate cancers (Romero Otero et al., 2014). Furthermore, the results of the present study demonstrated that the hs-cTnT and CK-MB biomarkers were significantly elevated in MI individuals, but not in BC, CRC and PCa patients compared with healthy volunteers. Therefore, the high specificity and selectivity of methods that are based on the detection of troponins led to the inclusion of troponin levels into the criteria for the diagnosis of MI (Adamcova et al., 2016). In addition, it has been suggested that there is no significant risk of cardiac failure in BC patients nor healthy individuals, when the levels of CK-MB are reduced (Blaes et al., 2015). However, no association has been documented between the survival rate and elevated hs-cTnT levels in BC and PCa patients (Florido et al., 2019). Further studies on liver biomarkers have revealed that ALP may be considered as a valuable and excellent hepatic biomarker for the early detection of BC, CRC and PCa. Liver injury and the resulting biochemical abnormalities are very common in cancer patients, may be due to metastasis, concomitant drugs, or previous liver damage, such as cirrhosis (Field et al., 2008). ALP has been found to be a valuable tumor marker with high specificity in detecting CRC (Saif et al., 2005), PCa (Rao et al., 2017) and metastatic and different stages of BC (Singh et al., 2013). However, a study demonstrated that CA15-3 was a better indicator for predicting BC relapse than ALP, while the combination of both biomarkers exhibited the best prediction results on BC relapse (Keshaviah et al., 2007). Furthermore, ALP velocity appears to be a strong independent predictor of bone metastases and overall survival in men with increased PSA levels (Metwalli et al., 2014). The expression of IL-18 has been previously investigated in several types of cancer, including gastric and colon carcinomas. In colon adenocarcinomas, reduced or abolished IL-18 synthesis levels have been detected, thus suggesting that IL-18 may play a tumor-suppressive role (Cao et al., 1999). Only one previous study has investigated the association between the IL-18 -607 A/C polymorphism and malignancy. In this study, no association between this specific polymorphism and oral cancer was detected (Jia et al., 2016). Genetic alterations such as single nucleotide polymorphisms are considered as major risk factors for BC (Zhao et al., 2012). The present study aimed to investigate the association between an IL-18 polymorphism and BC, CRC and PCa. It has been reported that the -607 A/C polymorphism affects the transcription of the IL-18 gene in patients with CRC and healthy controls. The results of the current study revealed that A/C heterozygotes exhibited an increased risk for CRC, while homozygotes for the highly presented C allele were protected against this type of cancer. This finding was in accordance with a previous study demonstrating that IL-18 was downregulated in CRC (Pagès et al., 1999). However, no association between the IL-18 -607 C/A polymorphism and susceptibility to BC was observed in the present study population. This finding was not consistent with a previous study demonstrating that the IL-18 serum levels were notably increased in metastatic compared with non-metastatic BC patients. In addition, the authors suggested that IL-18 could contribute to doxorubicin resistance (Günel et al., 2002). Therefore, due to its dual roles in both drug resistance and tumor metastasis, IL-18 may serve as a target for BC therapy. It has been shown that IL-18, in synergy with IL-12, plays a key role in Th1 responses by upregulating IFN-γ, and exhibits anti-tumor activities via mediating the increase of NK cell activity and induction of tumor cell apoptosis (Srabović et al., 2011). Furthermore, the increased IL-18 levels serve a major role in PCa cell growth, invasion, and metastasis (Nong et al., 2013). Therefore, it has been suggested that the elevated secretion of IL-18BP by PCa cells indicates the effort of cancer cells to overcome immune surveillance (Fujita et al., 2011). In addition, IL-18 potentiates antitumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment via the innate and adaptive immune responses (Tse et al., 2011). Although, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CEA, and TPSA are still considered as excellent biomarkers for the early detection of BC, CRC and PCa, the levels of liver enzymes may serve as alternative indicators for the early detection of CRC and PCa. The findings of the present study did not support a significant association between the IL-18 -670 C/A polymorphism and the risk of BC, CRC and PCa. However, this polymorphism may be regarded as a risk factor for BC, CRC and PCa. Therefore, further studies with larger number of study participants from different ethnic groups should be performed to further investigate the diagnostic potential of the aforementioned biomarkers. The results of these studies may exhibit a beneficial clinical effect.
  36 in total

1.  Lack of association between interleukin-18 -607 C/A gene polymorphism and pulmonary tuberculosis in Zahedan, Southeast Iran.

Authors:  M Taheri; S M Hashemi-Shahri; M Hamzehnejadi; M Naderi; A Moazeni-Roodi; G Bahari; M Hashemi
Journal:  Prague Med Rep       Date:  2012

2.  Interleukin 18 expression in the primary breast cancer tumour tissue.

Authors:  Nahida Srabović; Zlata Mujagić; Jasminka Mujanović-Mustedanagić; Zdeno Muminović; Elmir Cickusić
Journal:  Med Glas (Zenica)       Date:  2011-02

3.  CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials.

Authors:  A Keshaviah; S Dellapasqua; N Rotmensz; J Lindtner; D Crivellari; J Collins; M Colleoni; B Thürlimann; C Mendiola; S Aebi; K N Price; O Pagani; E Simoncini; M Castiglione Gertsch; R D Gelber; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  The role of periodic serum CA19-9 test in surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ryosuke Okamura; Suguru Hasegawa; Koya Hida; Nobuaki Hoshino; Kenji Kawada; Kenichi Sugihara; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  The dual effects of interleukin-18 in tumor progression.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; Soyoung Cheon; Daeho Cho
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 11.530

6.  Advanced stage of breast cancer hoist alkaline phosphatase activity: risk factor for females in India.

Authors:  A K Singh; A Pandey; M Tewari; R Kumar; A Sharma; K A Singh; H P Pandey; H S Shukla
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau; John Stagg; Denis Soulières; Fred Saad
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2016-05-05

8.  Predictive value of IL-18 and IL-10 in the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Baosong Li; Fengxia Wang; Chong Ma; Tao Hao; Longlong Geng; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  High preoperative serum CA 19-9 levels can predict poor oncologic outcomes in colorectal cancer patients on propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Jung Kyong Shin; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Yong Beom Cho; Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Clinical significance and diagnostic capacity of serum TK1, CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 levels in gastric and colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Shufang Ning; Wene Wei; Jilin Li; Bingbing Hou; Jianhong Zhong; Yuxuan Xie; Haizhou Liu; Xianwei Mo; Jiansi Chen; Litu Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  1 in total

1.  A faecal microbiota signature with high specificity for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ece Kartal; Thomas S B Schmidt; Esther Molina-Montes; Sandra Rodríguez-Perales; Jakob Wirbel; Oleksandr M Maistrenko; Wasiu A Akanni; Bilal Alashkar Alhamwe; Renato J Alves; Alfredo Carrato; Hans-Peter Erasmus; Lidia Estudillo; Fabian Finkelmeier; Anthony Fullam; Anna M Glazek; Paulina Gómez-Rubio; Rajna Hercog; Ferris Jung; Stefanie Kandels; Stephan Kersting; Melanie Langheinrich; Mirari Márquez; Xavier Molero; Askarbek Orakov; Thea Van Rossum; Raul Torres-Ruiz; Anja Telzerow; Konrad Zych; Vladimir Benes; Georg Zeller; Jonel Trebicka; Francisco X Real; Nuria Malats; Peer Bork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 31.793

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.