Literature DB >> 33507481

Allostatic score and its associations with demographics, healthy behaviors, tumor characteristics, and mitochondrial DNA among breast cancer patients.

Hua Zhao1,2, Renduo Song3, Yuanqing Ye3,4, Wong-Ho Chow3, Jie Shen3,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Allostatic load (AL), a composite index, has been used to capture variation in life-course stresses. However, few studies have been carried out among breast cancer patients.
METHODS: In this study, we examined the cross-sectional association of AL with demographics, healthy behaviors, tumor characteristics, and mitochondrial DNA copy number in breast cancer patients. The study used a sub-sample of 934 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at M.D. Anderson from 2013 to 2018. To construct the AL score, the study used a battery of seventeen factors that represents the activity of five physiological systems: metabolic, cardiovascular, immunological, renal, and liver.
RESULTS: AL was positively associated with the age of disease diagnosis (P = 0.002), and was higher in Black and Hispanic populations than White (P = 0.001 and 0.032, respectively). AL was also found more abundant in those who experienced marital dissolution (P = 0.006), lacked a college education (P = 0.045), currently smoked (P = 0.011), and had low levels of physical activity (P = 0.037) than their counterparts. The study then found that higher AL was associated with increased odds of having poorly differentiated tumors (Odds ratio (OR): 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28, 1.62). An additional significant association was observed between AL with estrogen receptor negative (ER-) (OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.36) among Black patients. Finally, we observed a significant positive correlation between AL with leukocyte mitochondrial DNA copy number variation (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude AL is influenced by selected demographics and healthy behaviors, and further is correlated with tumor characteristics and mitochondrial DNA copy number in breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allostatic load; Breast cancer; Healthy behaviors; Social-demographics; Tumor characteristics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507481     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  59 in total

1.  Does allostatic load calculation method matter? Evaluation of different methods and individual biomarkers functioning by race/ethnicity and educational level.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Howard; P Johnelle Sparks
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 2.  Variation in the Calculation of Allostatic Load Score: 21 Examples from NHANES.

Authors:  Michelle T Duong; Brianna A Bingham; Paola C Aldana; Stephanie T Chung; Anne E Sumner
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 3.  Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: cumulative allostatic load.

Authors:  Teresa Seeman; Elissa Epel; Tara Gruenewald; Arun Karlamangla; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.

Authors:  Zinzi D Bailey; Nancy Krieger; Madina Agénor; Jasmine Graves; Natalia Linos; Mary T Bassett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  History of socioeconomic disadvantage and allostatic load in later life.

Authors:  Tara L Gruenewald; Arun S Karlamangla; Perry Hu; Sharon Stein-Merkin; Carolyn Crandall; Brandon Koretz; Teresa E Seeman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Social status and biological dysregulation: the "status syndrome" and allostatic load.

Authors:  Melvin Seeman; Sharon Stein Merkin; Arun Karlamangla; Brandon Koretz; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Influence of clinical, societal, and treatment variables on racial differences in ER-/PR- breast cancer survival.

Authors:  M E Roseland; K Schwartz; J J Ruterbusch; L Lamerato; R Krajenta; J Booza; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Perceived neighborhood disorder, racial-ethnic discrimination and leading risk factors for chronic disease among women: California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013.

Authors:  Jesse J Plascak; Bernadette Hohl; Wendy E Barrington; Shirley Aa Beresford
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-07-10

10.  Neighborhood Social Determinants of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fokhrul Hossain; Denise Danos; Om Prakash; Aubrey Gilliland; Tekeda F Ferguson; Neal Simonsen; Claudia Leonardi; Qingzhao Yu; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lucio Miele; Richard Scribner
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-02-18
View more
  5 in total

1.  Association of Allostatic Load and All Cancer Risk in the SWAN Cohort.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Yufan Guan; Hua Zhao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Allostatic Load as an Insight into the Psychological Burden after Primary Treatment in Women with Breast Cancer: Influence of Physical Side Effects and Pain Perception.

Authors:  Azzurra Irelli; Jessica Ranieri; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Francesca De Pietro; Pamela Casalena; Lia Ginaldi; Katia Cannita; Dina Di Giacomo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Invited Commentary: It Is Time for Theoretically Informed Approaches to Surgical Disparities Research.

Authors:  Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 4.  Interrogating Patterns of Cancer Disparities by Expanding the Social Determinants of Health Framework to Include Biological Pathways of Social Experiences.

Authors:  Celina I Valencia; Francine C Gachupin; Yamilé Molina; Ken Batai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Neighborhood disadvantage and biological aging biomarkers among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Bernard F Fuemmeler; Vanessa B Sheppard; Harry D Bear; Renduo Song; Wong-Ho Chow; Hua Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.