Joseph D Maxwell1, Madeleine France2, Lucy E M Finnigan2, Howard H Carter2,3, Dick H J Thijssen2,4, Helen Jones2. 1. Research Institute of Sports and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. Joseph.Maxwell@mft.nhs.uk. 2. Research Institute of Sports and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Tom Reilly Building, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. 3. Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Integrative Physiology Group, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Repeated exposure to remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC; short bouts of non-lethal ischaemia) enhances peripheral vascular function within 1 week; whereas, longer periods of rIPC (~ 1 year) may improve cerebral perfusion. Increasing the 'dose' of rIPC may lead to superior effects. Given the similarities between exercise and rIPC, we examined whether adding exercise to the rIPC stimulus leads to greater adaptation in systemic vascular function. METHODS:Nineteen individuals with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) were randomly allocated to either 8 weeks of rIPC (n = 9) or 8 weeks of rIPC + exercise (rIPC + Ex) (n = 10). rIPC was applied three times per week in both conditions, and exercise consisted of 50 min (70% heart rate max) of cycling 3 times per week. Peripheral endothelial function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after ischaemia-reperfusion (IR). Cerebrovascular function was assessed by dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2peak) using a maximal aerobic capacity test. RESULTS:FMD% increased by 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4, 2.8) following rIPC + Ex and by 0.3% (- 1.1, 1.5) in the only rIPC but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.65). Neither intervention evoked a change in dCA or in CVR (P > 0.05). VO2peak increased by 2.8 ml/kg/min (1.7, 3.9) following the rIPC + Ex and by 0.1 ml/kg/min (- 1.0, 1.4) following the rIPC only intervention (P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Combining exercise with rIPC across an 8-week intervention does not lead to superior effects in cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular function compared to a repeated rIPC intervention in individuals at risk of CVD.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Repeated exposure to remote ischaemic preconditioning (rIPC; short bouts of non-lethal ischaemia) enhances peripheral vascular function within 1 week; whereas, longer periods of rIPC (~ 1 year) may improve cerebral perfusion. Increasing the 'dose' of rIPC may lead to superior effects. Given the similarities between exercise and rIPC, we examined whether adding exercise to the rIPC stimulus leads to greater adaptation in systemic vascular function. METHODS: Nineteen individuals with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) were randomly allocated to either 8 weeks of rIPC (n = 9) or 8 weeks of rIPC + exercise (rIPC + Ex) (n = 10). rIPC was applied three times per week in both conditions, and exercise consisted of 50 min (70% heart rate max) of cycling 3 times per week. Peripheral endothelial function was assessed using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before and after ischaemia-reperfusion (IR). Cerebrovascular function was assessed by dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and cardio-respiratory fitness (VO2peak) using a maximal aerobic capacity test. RESULTS:FMD% increased by 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4, 2.8) following rIPC + Ex and by 0.3% (- 1.1, 1.5) in the only rIPC but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.65). Neither intervention evoked a change in dCA or in CVR (P > 0.05). VO2peak increased by 2.8 ml/kg/min (1.7, 3.9) following the rIPC + Ex and by 0.1 ml/kg/min (- 1.0, 1.4) following the rIPC only intervention (P = 0.69). CONCLUSION: Combining exercise with rIPC across an 8-week intervention does not lead to superior effects in cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular function compared to a repeated rIPC intervention in individuals at risk of CVD.
Authors: Carissa J Murrell; James D Cotter; Kate N Thomas; Samuel J E Lucas; Michael J A Williams; Philip N Ainslie Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2012-06-06
Authors: Christopher J A Pugh; Daniel J Cuthbertson; Victoria S Sprung; Graham J Kemp; Paul Richardson; A Margot Umpleby; Daniel J Green; N Timothy Cable; Helen Jones Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Rosa Maria Bruno; Anke C C M van Mil; Sophie M Holder; Francesco Faita; Arno Greyling; Peter L Zock; Stefano Taddei; John E Deanfield; Thomas Luscher; Daniel J Green; Lorenzo Ghiadoni Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Joost P H Seeger; Nathalie M M Benda; Niels P Riksen; Arie P J van Dijk; Louise Bellersen; Maria T E Hopman; N Timothy Cable; Dick H J Thijssen Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Ammar W Ashor; Jose Lara; Mario Siervo; Carlos Celis-Morales; Clio Oggioni; Djordje G Jakovljevic; John C Mathers Journal: Sports Med Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 11.136