Emma H A Stahlie1, Viola Franke1, Charlotte L Zuur2, Willem M C Klop2, Bernies van der Hiel3, Bart A Van de Wiel4, Michel W J M Wouters1, Yvonne M Schrage1, Winan J van Houdt1, Alexander C J van Akkooi5. 1. Departments of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Room U2.38, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Departments of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Room U2.38, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.v.akkooi@nki.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex type 1 virus and known as an effective oncolytic immunotherapy for injectable cutaneous, subcutaneous and nodal melanoma lesions in stage IIIB-IVM1a patients. This study set out to identify prognostic factors for achieving a complete response that can be used to optimize patient selection for T-VEC monotherapy. METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, treated with T-VEC at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016-12 and 2020-01 with a follow-up time > 6 months, were included. Data were collected on baseline characteristics, responses and adverse events (AEs). Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted, and a prediction model was developed to identify prognostic factors associated with CR. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were included with a median age of 69 years, median follow-up time was 16.6 months. As best response, 58 patients (62%) had a CR, and the overall response rate was 79%. The durable response rate (objective response lasting > 6 months) was 51%. Grade 1-2 AEs occurred in almost every patient. Tumor size, type of metastases, prior treatment with systemic therapy and stage (8Th AJCC) were independent prognostic factors for achieving CR. The prediction model includes the predictors tumor size, type of metastases and number of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that intralesional T-VEC monotherapy is able to achieve high complete and durable responses. The prediction model shows that use of T-VEC in patients with less tumor burden is associated with better outcomes, suggesting use earlier in the course of the disease.
BACKGROUND: Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex type 1 virus and known as an effective oncolytic immunotherapy for injectable cutaneous, subcutaneous and nodal melanoma lesions in stage IIIB-IVM1a patients. This study set out to identify prognostic factors for achieving a complete response that can be used to optimize patient selection for T-VEC monotherapy. METHODS:Patients with stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, treated with T-VEC at the Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2016-12 and 2020-01 with a follow-up time > 6 months, were included. Data were collected on baseline characteristics, responses and adverse events (AEs). Uni- and multivariable analyses were conducted, and a prediction model was developed to identify prognostic factors associated with CR. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were included with a median age of 69 years, median follow-up time was 16.6 months. As best response, 58 patients (62%) had a CR, and the overall response rate was 79%. The durable response rate (objective response lasting > 6 months) was 51%. Grade 1-2 AEs occurred in almost every patient. Tumor size, type of metastases, prior treatment with systemic therapy and stage (8Th AJCC) were independent prognostic factors for achieving CR. The prediction model includes the predictors tumor size, type of metastases and number of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that intralesional T-VEC monotherapy is able to achieve high complete and durable responses. The prediction model shows that use of T-VEC in patients with less tumor burden is associated with better outcomes, suggesting use earlier in the course of the disease.
Authors: M T Tetzlaff; J L Messina; J E Stein; X Xu; R N Amaria; C U Blank; B A van de Wiel; P M Ferguson; R V Rawson; M I Ross; A J Spillane; J E Gershenwald; R P M Saw; A C J van Akkooi; W J van Houdt; T C Mitchell; A M Menzies; G V Long; J A Wargo; M A Davies; V G Prieto; J M Taube; R A Scolyer Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Raphael J Louie; Matthew C Perez; Mohammad Raheel Jajja; James Sun; Frances Collichio; Keith A Delman; Michael Lowe; Amod A Sarnaik; Jonathan S Zager; David W Ollila Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Viola Franke; Danique M S Berger; W Martin C Klop; Bernies van der Hiel; Bart A van de Wiel; Sylvia Ter Meulen; Michel W J M Wouters; Winan J van Houdt; Alexander C J van Akkooi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Robert H I Andtbacka; Howard L Kaufman; Frances Collichio; Thomas Amatruda; Neil Senzer; Jason Chesney; Keith A Delman; Lynn E Spitler; Igor Puzanov; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Mohammed Milhem; Lee Cranmer; Brendan Curti; Karl Lewis; Merrick Ross; Troy Guthrie; Gerald P Linette; Gregory A Daniels; Kevin Harrington; Mark R Middleton; Wilson H Miller; Jonathan S Zager; Yining Ye; Bin Yao; Ai Li; Susan Doleman; Ari VanderWalde; Jennifer Gansert; Robert S Coffin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alice Y Zhou; Daniel Y Wang; Svetlana McKee; Fei Ye; Chun-Che Wen; Debbie E Wallace; Kristin K Ancell; Robert M Conry; Douglas B Johnson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Matthew C Perez; John T Miura; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Youngchul Kim; Amanda Holstein; Daniel Lee; Amod A Sarnaik; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Howard L Kaufman; Thomas Amatruda; Tony Reid; Rene Gonzalez; John Glaspy; Eric Whitman; Kevin Harrington; John Nemunaitis; Andrew Zloza; Michael Wolf; Neil N Senzer Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Evalyn E A P Mulder; Jeffrey Damman; Daniëlle Verver; Astrid A M van der Veldt; Sam Tas; Tamana Khemai-Mehraban; Kim C Heezen; Roxane A Wouters; Cornelis Verhoef; Georges M G M Verjans; Anton W Langerak; Dirk J Grünhagen; Antien L Mooyaart Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Emma H A Stahlie; Viola Franke; Maartje W Rohaan; Lisanne P Zijlker; Sofie Wilgenhof; Vincent van der Noort; Alexander C J van Akkooi; John B A G Haanen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 4.638