Literature DB >> 33507318

[Artificial intelligence in breast imaging : Areas of application from a clinical perspective].

Pascal A T Baltzer1.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE: Central to breast imaging is the coordination of clinical and multimodal imaging information with percutaneous image-guided biopsies and surgical procedures. A wide range of problems arise due to this complexity: missed cancers, overdiagnosis, false-positive findings, unnecessary further imaging, biopsies and surgeries. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: Breast imaging comprises the following diagnostic tests: mammography, tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced mammography, (multiparametric) ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, nuclear medicine derived imaging and hybrid methods. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to alleviate practically all these problems of breast imaging. AI has the potential to avoid missed cancers and false-positive findings. Furthermore, it could guide an efficient use of imaging methods and it may potentially be used to define biological phenotypes of breast cancer. PERFORMANCE: AI-based software is being developed for various applications. Most developed are systems that support mammography screening. Problems are monocentric approaches and the focus on short-term financial success. ACHIEVEMENTS: AI promises to improve breast imaging by simplifying and speeding up the workflow, by reducing monotonous tasks and by pointing out problems. This is likely to set free physician capacities that could be invested in improved communication with patients and interdisciplinary colleagues. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The present article mainly addresses clinical needs in breast imaging, pointing out potential areas of use for artificial intelligence. Depending on the definition, a wide array of helpful software tools for breast imaging are already available. Global solutions, however, are still missing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Early diagnosis; Mammography; Precision medicine; Software

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507318      PMCID: PMC7851036          DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00802-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  45 in total

1.  Underdiagnosis is the main challenge in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Marije F Bakker; Stéphanie V de Lange; Ruud M Pijnappel; Ritse M Mann; Petra H M Peeters; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Marleen J Emaus; Claudette E Loo; Robertus H C Bisschops; Marc B I Lobbes; Matthijn D F de Jong; Katya M Duvivier; Jeroen Veltman; Nico Karssemeijer; Harry J de Koning; Paul J van Diest; Willem P T M Mali; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Wouter B Veldhuis; Carla H van Gils
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography vs. conventional mammography in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer - A model-based economic evaluation.

Authors:  Clemens G Kaiser; Matthias Dietzel; Tibor Vag; Matthias F Froelich
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence: A Private Practice Perspective.

Authors:  Nina Kottler
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Overdiagnosis in breast imaging.

Authors:  Andy Evans; Sarah Vinnicombe
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Johanna O P Wanders; Katharina Holland; Wouter B Veldhuis; Ritse M Mann; Ruud M Pijnappel; Petra H M Peeters; Carla H van Gils; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Hildegunn S Aase; Marina Álvarez; Edward Azavedo; Henk J Baarslag; Corinne Balleyguier; Pascal A Baltzer; Vanesa Beslagic; Ulrich Bick; Dragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic; Ruta Briediene; Boris Brkljacic; Julia Camps Herrero; Catherine Colin; Eleanor Cornford; Jan Danes; Gérard de Geer; Gul Esen; Andrew Evans; Michael H Fuchsjaeger; Fiona J Gilbert; Oswald Graf; Gormlaith Hargaden; Thomas H Helbich; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Valentin Ivanov; Ásbjörn Jónsson; Christiane K Kuhl; Eugenia C Lisencu; Elzbieta Luczynska; Ritse M Mann; Jose C Marques; Laura Martincich; Margarete Mortier; Markus Müller-Schimpfle; Katalin Ormandi; Pietro Panizza; Federica Pediconi; Ruud M Pijnappel; Katja Pinker; Tarja Rissanen; Natalia Rotaru; Gianni Saguatti; Tamar Sella; Jana Slobodníková; Maret Talk; Patrice Taourel; Rubina M Trimboli; Ilse Vejborg; Athina Vourtsis; Gabor Forrai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine Vachon; Marije F Bakker; Graham G Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M L Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; John L Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard A Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F Boyd; Carla H van Gils; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multimodal Imaging of Target Detection Algorithm under Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Meiping Jiang; Sanlin Lei; Junhui Zhang; Liqiong Hou; Meixiang Zhang; Yingchun Luo
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.