Literature DB >> 33507159

Privacy Policy Compliance of Chronic Disease Management Apps in China: Scale Development and Content Evaluation.

Zhenni Ni1,2,3, Yiying Wang4, Yuxing Qian1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the development of mobile health (mHealth), chronic disease management apps have brought not only the possibility of reducing the burden of chronic diseases but also huge privacy risks to patients' health data.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to analyze the extent to which chronic disease management apps in China comply with the Personal Information Security Specification (PI Specification).
METHODS: The compliance of 45 popular chronic disease management apps was evaluated from the perspective of the information life cycle. To conduct a fine-grained evaluation, a scale based on the PI Specification was developed. Finally, 6 level 1 indicators, 22 level 2 indicators, and 61 level 3 indicators were defined.
RESULTS: There were 33/45 apps (73%) with a privacy policy, and the average score of these apps was 40.4 out of 100. Items of level 1 indicators with high scores included general characteristics (mean 51.9% [SD 28.1%]), information collection and use (mean 51.1% [SD 36.7%]), and information sharing and transfer (mean 50.3% [SD 33.5%]). Information storage and protection had the lowest compliance with PI Specification (mean 29.4% [SD 32.4%]). Few personal information (PI) controllers have stated how to handle security incidents, including security incident reporting (7/33, 21%), security incident notification (10/33, 30%), and commitment to bear corresponding legal responsibility for PI security incidents (1/33, 3%). The performance of apps in the stage of information destruction (mean 31.8% [SD 40.0%]) was poor, and only 21% (7/33) apps would notify third parties to promptly delete PI after individuals cancelled their accounts. Moreover, the scoring rate for rights of PI subjects is generally low (mean 31.2% [SD 35.5%]), especially for obtaining copies of PI (15%) and responding to requests (25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although most chronic disease management apps had a privacy policy, the total compliance rate of the policy content was low, especially in the stage of information storage and protection. Thus, the field has a long way to go with regard to compliance around personal privacy protection in China. ©Zhenni Ni, Yiying Wang, Yuxing Qian. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 28.01.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  content analysis; mHealth; noncommunicable diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33507159      PMCID: PMC7878107          DOI: 10.2196/23409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  21 in total

1.  Mobile phone applications for diabetes management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Adrián Quevedo Rodríguez; Ana M Wägner
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed)       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 1.417

2.  Privacy Issues in Smartphone Applications: An Analysis of Headache/Migraine Applications.

Authors:  Mia T Minen; Eric J Stieglitz; Rose Sciortino; John Torous
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.887

3.  Effective? Engaging? Secure? Applying the ORCHA-24 framework to evaluate apps for chronic insomnia disorder.

Authors:  Simon Leigh; Jing Ouyang; Chris Mimnagh
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 4.  Features, outcomes, and challenges in mobile health interventions for patients living with chronic diseases: A review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andreas Triantafyllidis; Haridimos Kondylakis; Konstantinos Votis; Dimitrios Tzovaras; Nicos Maglaveras; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Privacy Policies for Apps Targeted Toward Youth: Descriptive Analysis of Readability.

Authors:  Gitanjali Das; Cynthia Cheung; Camille Nebeker; Matthew Bietz; Cinnamon Bloss
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  The Complexity of Mental Health App Privacy Policies: A Potential Barrier to Privacy.

Authors:  Adam C Powell; Preeti Singh; John Torous
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Availability, readability, and content of privacy policies and terms of agreements of mental health apps.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Tanya L Feng; Arlo B Sporn; Jen-Ai Lai; Cody Lo; Monica Ta; Roland Nadler
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2019-03-06

8.  Assessment of the Data Sharing and Privacy Practices of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Smoking Cessation.

Authors:  Kit Huckvale; John Torous; Mark E Larsen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-04-05

9.  Medication Management Apps for Diabetes: Systematic Assessment of the Transparency and Reliability of Health Information Dissemination.

Authors:  Zhilian Huang; Elaine Lum; Josip Car
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Assessing the Privacy of mHealth Apps for Self-Tracking: Heuristic Evaluation Approach.

Authors:  Luke Hutton; Blaine A Price; Ryan Kelly; Ciaran McCormick; Arosha K Bandara; Tally Hatzakis; Maureen Meadows; Bashar Nuseibeh
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.