Literature DB >> 33506990

A phenotypic risk score for predicting mortality in sickle cell disease.

Vandana Sachdev1, Xin Tian1, Yuan Gu1, James Nichols1, Stanislav Sidenko1, Wen Li1, Andrea Beri2, W Austin Layne2, Darlene Allen1, Colin O Wu1, Swee Lay Thein1.   

Abstract

Risk assessment for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) remains challenging as it depends on an individual physician's experience and ability to integrate a variety of test results. We aimed to provide a new risk score that combines clinical, laboratory, and imaging data. In a prospective cohort of 600 adult patients with SCD, we assessed the relationship of 70 baseline covariates to all-cause mortality. Random survival forest and regularised Cox regression machine learning (ML) methods were used to select top predictors. Multivariable models and a risk score were developed and internally validated. Over a median follow-up of 4·3 years, 131 deaths were recorded. Multivariable models were developed using nine independent predictors of mortality: tricuspid regurgitant velocity, estimated right atrial pressure, mitral E velocity, left ventricular septal thickness, body mass index, blood urea nitrogen, alkaline phosphatase, heart rate and age. Our prognostic risk score had superior performance with a bias-corrected C-statistic of 0·763. Our model stratified patients into four groups with significantly different 4-year mortality rates (3%, 11%, 35% and 75% respectively). Using readily available variables from patients with SCD, we applied ML techniques to develop and validate a mortality risk scoring method that reflects the summation of cardiopulmonary, renal and liver end-organ damage. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT#00011648. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; risk assessment; sickle cell anaemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33506990      PMCID: PMC9123430          DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   8.615


  9 in total

1.  NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide levels and the risk of death in the cooperative study of sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Roberto F Machado; Mariana Hildesheim; Laurel Mendelsohn; Alan T Remaley; Gregory J Kato; Mark T Gladwin
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Somatic Mutations and Clonal Hematopoiesis in Aplastic Anemia.

Authors:  Tetsuichi Yoshizato; Bogdan Dumitriu; Kohei Hosokawa; Hideki Makishima; Kenichi Yoshida; Danielle Townsley; Aiko Sato-Otsubo; Yusuke Sato; Delong Liu; Hiromichi Suzuki; Colin O Wu; Yuichi Shiraishi; Michael J Clemente; Keisuke Kataoka; Yusuke Shiozawa; Yusuke Okuno; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Yasunobu Nagata; Takamasa Katagiri; Ayana Kon; Masashi Sanada; Phillip Scheinberg; Satoru Miyano; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Shinji Nakao; Neal S Young; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; Xiaoying Yang; Colin O Wu; Kiang Liu; W Gregory Hundley; Robyn McClelland; Antoinette S Gomes; Aaron R Folsom; Steven Shea; Eliseo Guallar; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso-type problems.

Authors:  Robert Tibshirani; Jacob Bien; Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Noah Simon; Jonathan Taylor; Ryan J Tibshirani
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  Factors associated with survival in a contemporary adult sickle cell disease cohort.

Authors:  Hany Elmariah; Melanie E Garrett; Laura M De Castro; Jude C Jonassaint; Kenneth I Ataga; James R Eckman; Allison E Ashley-Koch; Marilyn J Telen
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Biomarker signatures of sickle cell disease severity.

Authors:  Mengtian Du; Sarah Van Ness; Victor Gordeuk; Sayed M Nouraie; Sergei Nekhai; Mark Gladwin; Martin H Steinberg; Paola Sebastiani
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A network model to predict the risk of death in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Paola Sebastiani; Vikki G Nolan; Clinton T Baldwin; Maria M Abad-Grau; Ling Wang; Adeboye H Adewoye; Lillian C McMahon; Lindsay A Farrer; James G Taylor; Gregory J Kato; Mark T Gladwin; Martin H Steinberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Sickle Cell Anemia and Its Phenotypes.

Authors:  Thomas N Williams; Swee Lay Thein
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 9.340

Review 9.  Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges.

Authors:  Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Rickey E Carter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.