Literature DB >> 33506309

Value of integrated PET-IVIM MRI in predicting lymphovascular space invasion in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis.

Chen Xu1,2, Yang Yu1, Xiaoran Li1, Hongzan Sun3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contributory value of positron emission tomography (PET)-intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the prediction of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients with cervical cancer without signs of lymph node metastasis on PET/MRI were enrolled in this study. The tumours were classified into LVSI-positive (n = 25) and LVSI-negative (n = 65) groups according to postoperative pathology. The PET-derived parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) and IVIM-derived parameters (ADCmean, ADCmin, Dmean, Dmin, f, D* and gross tumour volume (GTV)) between the two groups were evaluated using a Student's t test (Mann-Whitney U test for variables with a nonnormal distribution) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The optimal combination of PET/MR parameters for predicting LVSI was investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models and evaluated by ROC curves. The optimal cutoff threshold values corresponded to the maximal values of the Youden index. A control model was established using 1000 bootstrapped samples, for which the performance was validated using calibration curves and ROC curves.
RESULTS: PET-derived parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) and IVIM MRI-derived parameters (Dmin, ADCmin, GTV) were significantly different between patients with and without LVSI (P < 0.05). Logistic analyses showed that a combination of TLG and Dmin had the strongest predictive value for LVSI diagnosis (area under the curve (AUC), 0.861; sensitivity, 80.00; specificity, 86.15; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff threshold values for Dmin and TLG were 0.58 × 10-3 mm2/s and 66.68 g/cm3, respectively. The verification model showed the combination of TLG and Dmin had the strongest predictive value, and its ROC curve and calibration curve showed good accuracy (AUC, 0.878) and consistency.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TLG and Dmin may be the best indicator for predicting LVSI in cervical cancer without lymphatic metastasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Integrated PET/MR; LVSI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33506309     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05208-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  30 in total

Review 1.  2018 FIGO Staging System for Uterine Cervical Cancer: Enter Cross-sectional Imaging.

Authors:  Susanna I Lee; Mostafa Atri
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael R Milam
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Late Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer more than 3 Years after Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Node Dissection.

Authors:  Jitti Hanprasertpong; Ingporn Jiamset
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.825

4.  Clinical and pathological characteristics related to parametrial involvement in clinical early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gokhan Boyraz; Derman Basaran; Mehmet C Salman; Nejat Ozgul; Kunter Yuce
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Satellite lymphovascular space invasion: An independent risk factor in early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fraukje J M Pol; Petra L M Zusterzeel; Maaike A P C van Ham; Danielle A T Kuijpers; Johan Bulten; Leon F A G Massuger
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Prediction of local recurrence in cervical cancer by a Cox model comprised of lymph node status, lymph-vascular space invasion, and intratumoral Th17 cell-infiltration.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Xiang-Ming Lou; Yan He
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Cervical cancer: A global health crisis.

Authors:  William Small; Monica A Bacon; Amishi Bajaj; Linus T Chuang; Brandon J Fisher; Matthew M Harkenrider; Anuja Jhingran; Henry C Kitchener; Linda R Mileshkin; Akila N Viswanathan; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Changes in cervical cancer FDG uptake during chemoradiation and association with response.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kidd; Maria Thomas; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery?

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Clinical significance of lympho vascular space involvement and lymph node micrometastases in early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective case-control surgico-pathological study.

Authors:  Pierangelo Marchiolé; Annie Buénerd; Mehdi Benchaib; Karima Nezhat; Daniel Dargent; Patrice Mathevet
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiomics in Gastric Cancer: First Clinical Investigation to Predict Lymph Vascular Invasion and Survival Outcome Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Images.

Authors:  Liping Yang; Wenjie Chu; Mengyue Li; Panpan Xu; Menglu Wang; Mengye Peng; Kezheng Wang; Lingbo Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging for Risk Factors in Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging.

Authors:  Xingxing Jin; Ruifang Yan; Zhong Li; Gaiyun Zhang; Wenling Liu; Hongxia Wang; Meng Zhang; Jinxia Guo; Kaiyu Wang; Dongming Han
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging for assessing programmed death-ligand 1 status in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative study with intravoxel incoherent motion and 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Nan Meng; Fangfang Fu; Jing Sun; Pengyang Feng; Yu Luo; Yaping Wu; Xiaochen Li; Jianmin Yuan; Yang Yang; Hui Liu; Zhe Wang; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

4.  Markers of Prognosis for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Patients (Stage IB1, IB2) Undergoing Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Tie Ma; Hongzan Sun; Xiaohan Li; Song Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.