| Literature DB >> 33506159 |
Keitaro Kanie1, Genzo Iguchi2,3, Megumi Inuzuka4, Kentaro Sakaki5, Hironori Bando1, Shin Urai1, Hiroki Shichi1, Yasunori Fujita1, Ryusaku Matsumoto1, Kentaro Suda1, Masaaki Yamamoto6, Hidenori Fukuoka6, Takao Taniguchi5, Wataru Ogawa1, Yutaka Takahashi1,7.
Abstract
Anti-pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (PIT-1) hypophysitis (anti-PIT-1 antibody syndrome) is a thymoma-associated autoimmune disease characterized by acquired growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), and thyrotropin (TSH) deficiencies due to autoimmunity against PIT-1. Ectopic expression of PIT-1 in the thymoma plays a causal role in development of the disease. Here, we report 2 cases of anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis exhibiting as a form of paraneoplastic syndrome with conditions other than thymoma. A 79-year-old woman (case 1) and an 86-year-old man (case 2) were referred with a suspicion of anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis because of acquired GH, PRL, and TSH deficiencies. Case 1 was complicated by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the bladder and case 2 was diagnosed with malignancy with multiple metastases of unknown origin. Because circulating anti-PIT-1 antibody was detected, both patients were diagnosed with anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis. Circulating PIT-1-reactive T cells were detected in case 1 via enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay. Interestingly, the PIT-1 protein was ectopically expressed in the DLBCL cells of case 1, whereas DLBCL tissues derived from patients without anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis were negative for PIT-1. In case 2, the materials were not available because of best supportive care was under way. These data show that anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis is associated not only with thymoma but also with other malignancies. Additionally, the ectopic expression of PIT-1 in the DLBCL tissues and presence of PIT-1-reactive T cells suggested that the underlying mechanisms were similar to those observed in thymoma. Thus, anti-PIT-1 hypophysitis is defined as a form of paraneoplastic syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: anti–PIT-1 antibody syndrome; anti–PIT-1 hypophysitis; autoimmunity; hypopituitarism; paraneoplastic syndrome
Year: 2020 PMID: 33506159 PMCID: PMC7814384 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Endocr Soc ISSN: 2472-1972
Endocrinological data of cases 1 and 2
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Normal range | Unit of measure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GH | Basal | 0.01 | < 0.03 | ng/mL | |
| Peak | 0.01 | < 0.03 | ng/mL | ||
| ACTH | Basal | 13.9 | 7.4 | 7.4-63.1 | pg/mL |
| Peak | 93.2 | 39.4 | pg/mL | ||
| Cortisol | Basal | 13.2 | 14.2 | μg/dL | |
| Peak | 24.6 | 23.1 | μg/dL | ||
| TSH | Basal | 0.03 | 0.2 | 0.4-5.0 | μIU/mL |
| Peak | 0.03 | 0.3 | μIU/mL | ||
| PRL | Basal | 0.3 | 0.2 | 3.6-12.8 | ng/mL |
| Peak | 0.3 | 0.2 | ng/mL | ||
| LH | 33.9 | 10.1 | 0.8-5.7 | μIU/mL | |
| FSH | 161.9 | 23.7 | 0.7-1.5 | μIU/mL | |
| IGF-1 | 66.0 | 18.0 | ng/mL | ||
| FT4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7-1.5 | ng/dL | |
| TPOAb | Negative | Negative | IU/mL | ||
| TgAb | Negative | Negative | ng/mL | ||
| TRAb | Negative | NA | IU/L | ||
| GADAb | Negative | NA | U/mL |
Endocrinological examination demonstrated a specific defect in GH, TSH, and PRL secretion. FT4 and IGF-1 were evaluated at the first visit before replacement therapy, including levothyroxine.
Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropin; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxine; GADAb, antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody; GH, growth hormone; IA2Ab, anti-insulinoma–associated protein-2 antibody; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1, LH, luteinizing hormone; NA, not applicable; PRL, prolactin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody; TPOAb, antithyroid peroxidase antibody; TRAb, thyrotropin receptor antibody, TSH, thyrotropin.
Figure 1.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) images of cases 1 and 2. A, B, and C, Case 1; D, E, and F, Case 2; A, A sagittal view of pituitary MRI showed that the pituitary was slightly atrophic. B No tumor was detected in the chest CT of the anterior mediastinum including thymoma. C, Lower abdominal CT demonstrated a bladder tumor (arrowhead) and thickening of the bladder wall. D, A sagittal view of the pituitary MRI showed that the pituitary was morphologically normal. E, Chest CT demonstrated no thymoma. F, Multiple lymphadenopathies (arrowhead) and vertebral body infiltrate (arrowhead) were detected.
Figure 2.The detection of circulating anti–pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (anti–PIT-1) antibody using immunoblotting. The upper panel shows the detection of the anti–PIT-1 antibody using patient serum as the primary antibody. Preabsorption of the serum with recombinant human PIT-1 protein diminished the specific signal, demonstrating the specificity of the autoantibodies for PIT-1. The lower panel shows the results of negative control using the serum of healthy individuals and positive control using the serum of the patient with anti–PIT-1 hypophysitis as previously reported (case 1, [1]).
Figure 3.Detection of pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (PIT-1)-reactive cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A, Images of the results of ELISPOT assay. Responses of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion from T cells under the stimulation of PIT-1 protein was detected as the spots. As a positive control, PBMCs of the previously reported patient with anti–PIT-1 hypophysitis [1] was used. PBMCs from case 2 were not available because of best supportive care. B, Quantitative analysis of the spots showed a significant increase in the number of spots as compared with controls. Data are plotted as mean ± SEM. Unpaired t test or one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test was used to assess significance levels. Significance levels were set at *P less than .05 and **P less than .01.
Figure 4.Ectopic pituitary-specific transcription factor 1 (PIT-1) expression in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells in case 1. Immunohistochemistry for PIT-1 using DLBCL tissues of case 1 and control cases without anti–PIT-1 hypophysitis. DLBCL cells in case 1 specifically expressed PIT-1 expression, whereas control DLBCL cells were negative for PIT-1. The serum of the patient [1] and a commercially available anti–PIT-1 antibody specifically showed the signal. Scale bars: 50 µm.