Literature DB >> 33506007

Pathology-Related Influences on the VEM: Three Years' Experience since Implementation of a New Parameter in Phoniatric Voice Diagnostics.

Constanze Müller1,2, Felix Caffier1, Tadeus Nawka1, Matthias Müller1, Philipp P Caffier1.   

Abstract

The vocal extent measure (VEM) represents a new diagnostic tool to express vocal capacity by quantifying the dynamic performance and frequency range of voice range profiles (VRPs). For VEM calculation, the VRP area is multiplied by the quotient of the theoretical perimeter of a circle with equal VRP area and the actual VRP perimeter. Since different diseases affect voice function to varying degrees, pathology-related influences on the VEM should be investigated more detailed in this retrospective study, three years after VEM implementation. Data was obtained in a standardized voice assessment comprising videolaryngostroboscopy, voice handicap index (VHI-9i), and acoustic-aerodynamic analysis with automatic calculation of VEM and dysphonia severity index (DSI). The complete dataset comprised 1030 subjects, from which 994 adults (376 male, 618 female; 18-86 years) were analyzed more detailed. The VEM differed significantly between pathology subgroups (p < 0.001) and correlated with the corresponding DSI values. Regarding VHI-9i, the VEM reflected the subjective impairment better than the DSI. We conclude that the VEM proved to be a comprehensible and easy-to-use interval-scaled parameter for objective VRP evaluation in all pathology subgroups. As expected, exclusive consideration of the measured pathology-related influences on the VEM does not allow conclusions regarding the specific underlying diagnosis.
Copyright © 2020 Constanze Müller et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33506007      PMCID: PMC7814951          DOI: 10.1155/2020/5309508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


  49 in total

1.  The relation of vocal fold lesions and voice quality to voice handicap and psychosomatic well-being.

Authors:  R Smits; H Marres; Felix de Jong
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  A comparison of white light laryngostroboscopy versus autofluorescence endoscopy in the evaluation of vocal fold pathology.

Authors:  Philipp P Caffier; Bernd Schmidt; Manfred Gross; Klaus Karnetzky; Tadeus Nawka; Andreas Rotter; Matthias Seipelt; Benedikt Sedlmaier
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Development of the child's voice: premutation, mutation.

Authors:  T Hacki; S Heitmüller
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1999-10-05       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Phonational profiles of male trained singers and nonsingers.

Authors:  R J Morris; W S Brown; D M Hicks; E Howell
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  A structured approach to voice range profile (phonetogram) analysis.

Authors:  A M Sulter; H P Wit; H K Schutte; D G Miller
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-10

6.  Laryngeal aerodynamic analysis in assisting with the diagnosis of muscle tension dysphonia.

Authors:  Yi-Qing Zheng; Bi-Ru Zhang; Wei-Yang Su; Jian Gong; Man-Qiong Yuan; Yuan-Lin Ding; Shao-Qi Rao
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Influence of size and etiology of glottal gap in glottic incompetence dysphonia.

Authors:  K Omori; D H Slavit; A Kacker; S M Blaugrund
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Dysphonia Classification of DSI and AVQI.

Authors:  Ben Barsties V Latoszek; Nora Ulozaitė-Stanienė; Tadas Petrauskas; Virgilijus Uloza; Youri Maryn
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The Vocal Extent Measure: Development of a Novel Parameter in Voice Diagnostics and Initial Clinical Experience.

Authors:  Philipp P Caffier; Andreas Möller; Eleanor Forbes; Constanze Müller; Marie-Louise Freymann; Tadeus Nawka
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Vocal Feminization for Transgender Women: Current Strategies and Patient Perspectives.

Authors:  Hyung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2020-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.