| Literature DB >> 33505934 |
Adebanjo Ayobamidele Badejo1,2, Tolulope Israel Duyilemi1, Abiodun James Falarunu1, Olamide Abigail Akande1.
Abstract
The functional beverage market has recently increased due to the health benefits in addition to their nutritional and thirst-quenching functions. Tigernut is an economic crop with reported health benefits. This study evaluates the antioxidative potential of processed tigernut extracts fortified with baobab fruit pulp powder. The ferric reducing antioxidant potential, 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl were used to determine the antioxidant capacity, while the Folin-Ciocalteu method was used to measure the total phenolic content of the beverages. The inclusion of baobab fruit significantly (P<0.05) increased the total phenolic content by 18% (from 31.06 to 36.83 mg gallic acid equivalent/100 mL) and the flavonoid content by 15∼20%, while the vitamin C content peaked at 39.6 mg/100 mL. There was a significant correlation between the phenolic and vitamin C contents. Overall, the antioxidant potentials were elevated with the inclusion of baobab powder. All the beverages included in this study are good sources of Ca, P, and K; the contents of Ca, P, and K in the roasted tuber extracts with baobab peaked at 210.91, 8.70, and 93.35 μg/mL, respectively. However, the K:Na ratio was greater than 5:1. Although, baobab increased the acidity of the beverages, it did not significantly diminish the consumer acceptability, with the values ranging from 7.62 to 8.40 on a 9-point Hedonic scale. The beverages have potential for use as natural antioxidants and could be recommended for consumers with diets deficient in Ca and K, particularly in food insecure communities. They could also be used as a replacement for sugar-sweetened carbonated beverages.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; baobab fruit; beverage; mineral; tigernut
Year: 2020 PMID: 33505934 PMCID: PMC7813594 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.4.400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
The physicochemical parameters of tigernut-baobab beverages
| Sample | °Brix | TTA | pH |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAO | BAO | 0.57±0.03[ | 3.04±0.01[ |
| FRS | FRS | 0.20±0.02[ | 6.75±0.01[ |
| FSS | FSS | 0.39±0.05[ | 4.79±0.01[ |
| ROA | ROA | 0.19±0.02[ | 6.78±0.01[ |
| RSS | RSS | 0.45±0.01[ | 4.67±0.01[ |
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values within the column with the different letters (a-d) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
TTA: titratable acidity (g/100 mL).
BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder.
The mineral composition of tigernut-baobab beverages (unit: μg/mL)
| Sample | Ca | Mn | K | Na | P | K/Na | Ca/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAO | 169.09±2.12[ | 0.07±0.03[ | 48.52±0.11[ | 2.31±0.04[ | 5.66±0.06[ | 21 | 29.9 |
| FRS | 175.11±3.15[ | 1.31±0.04[ | 83.90±0.29[ | 3.10±0.04[ | 5.74±0.13[ | 27.1 | 30.5 |
| FSS | 192.24±3.37[ | 1.02±0.06[ | 86.26±0.06[ | 2.69±0.05[ | 7.87±0.01[ | 28.3 | 24.4 |
| ROA | 184.24±2.37[ | 1.98±0.07[ | 88.24±0.09[ | 3.36±0.06[ | 4.62±0.05[ | 26.3 | 39.9 |
| RSS | 210.91±3.13[ | 1.20±0.03[ | 93.35±0.08[ | 3.02±0.04[ | 8.70±0.07[ | 30.9 | 24.2 |
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values within the column with the different letters (a-e) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder.
Fig. 1Vitamin C (A), total phenolic (B), and total flavonoids (C) contents of tigernut-baobab beverages. Data are mean±SD (n=3). Bars with the different letters (a-d) were significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; RE, rutin equivalent.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) for DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assay results, and phenolics and flavonoid contents of tigernut-baobab beverages
| ABTS | FRAP | Phenolics | Flavonoids | Vitamin C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | 0.936[ | 0.847 | 0.841 | 0.772 | 0.960[ |
| ABTS | 0.843 | 0.899[ | 0.893[ | 0.967[ | |
| FRAP | 0.947[ | 0.900[ | 0.802 | ||
| Phenolics | 0.881[ | 0.884[ | |||
| Flavonoids | 0.768 |
*Correlation is significant at 0.05 level.
Fig. 2Antioxidant capacities of the tigernut-baobab beverages, as shown by (A) DPPH, (B) ABTS, and (C) FRAP assays. Values are mean±SD (n=3). Bars with the same letters (a-e) are not significantly different (P>0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test. BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder.
CIE colour analysis of the tigernut-baobab beverages
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | c* | h* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAO | 23.64±0.06[ | 3.40±0.02[ | 3.40±0.02[ | 10.29±0.03[ | 70.75±0.06[ |
| FRS | 78.65±0.05[ | 1.01±0.00[ | 1.01±0.00[ | 10.16±0.01[ | 84.30±0.02[ |
| FSS | 73.62±0.03[ | 2.22±0.02[ | 2.22±0.02[ | 13.75±0.02[ | 80.28±0.07[ |
| ROA | 76.14±0.03[ | 2.69±0.01[ | 2.69±0.01[ | 13.62±0.01[ | 86.24±0.57[ |
| RSS | 70.63±0.03[ | 3.11±0.01[ | 3.11±0.01[ | 13.75±0.02[ | 85.31±0.36[ |
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values within the column with the different letters (a-e) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder.
The sensory parameters of tigernut-baobab beverages
| Samples | Colour | Appearance | Taste | Overall acceptability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAO | 6.20±0.47[ | 6.40±0.68[ | 5.52±0.68[ | 5.88±0.36[ |
| FRS | 7.61±0.44[ | 7.85±0.37[ | 7.42±0.98[ | 7.62±0.24[ |
| FSS | 8.12±0.82[ | 7.73±0.08[ | 7.46±0.06[ | 8.19±0.30[ |
| ROA | 8.52±0.50[ | 8.88±0.21[ | 8.84±0.40[ | 8.20±0.26[ |
| RSS | 8.52±0.34[ | 8.70±0.28[ | 8.68±0.37[ | 8.40±0.47[ |
Data are mean±SD (n=30).
Values within the column with the different letters (a-c) are significantly different (P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
BAO, 97.5% water and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; FRS, 100% fresh tigernut extract; FSS, 97.5% fresh tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder; ROA, 100% roasted tigernut extract; RSS, 97.5% roasted tigernut extract and 2.5% baobab fruit powder.
Measured by nine-point hedonic scale: 1, dislike extremely; 2, dislike very much; 3, dislike moderately; 4, dislike slightly; 5, neither like nor dislike; 6, like slightly; 7, like moderately; 8, like very much; 9, like extremely much.