Literature DB >> 33505861

Measuring Health Outcomes in HIV: Time to Bring in the Patient Experience.

Niki O'Brien1,2, Y-Ling Chi3, Karolin R Krause4.   

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past decade, the global response to HIV has led to a reduction in the number of new infections, and a decrease in associated mortality. Yet, the number of people living with HIV (PLHIV) is high, with an estimated 38 million infected worldwide. As HIV shifts from being an acute terminal illness to a chronic condition, evaluating programmatic responses to HIV with sole reliance on biological markers (such as viral load or CD4 cell count) as proxies for patient health may no longer be suitable. HIV affects the lives of those infected in myriad ways which should be reflected in programme evaluations by measuring health-related quality of life, in addition to biomarkers. Discussion: In this commentary we argue that there is a pressing need to review how a "good" health outcome is defined and measured in light of care systems moving towards value-based frameworks that measure value in terms of the actual health outcomes achieved (rather than processes of care), global response shifting to providing long-term care for PLHIV in the community, and integrating HIV as part of universal health coverage plans. Efforts should be directed towards validating generic and disease specific patient-reported measures of PLHIV, to identify the most suitable tools. Such efforts will ensure that patient experience is appropriately captured, especially to be used in programme or economic evaluations. Conclusions: It is only by recognising and measuring the full range of health, mental and social outcomes related to the disease that the health status of PLHIV can be fully understood. Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33505861      PMCID: PMC7792468          DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-9996            Impact factor:   2.462


  23 in total

1.  ART in sub-Saharan Africa: the value of viral load monitoring.

Authors:  Kim C E Sigaloff; Tobias F Rinke de Wit
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 12.767

Review 2.  Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement.

Authors:  S Ebrahim
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV).

Authors:  A W Wu; D A Revicki; D Jacobson; F E Malitz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life assessment after antiretroviral therapy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Harleen Gakhar; Amanda Kamali; Mark Holodniy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Identification of Endpoints for Development of Antifibrosis Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Stefanos Bonovas; Anthony Lopez; Gionata Fiorino; William J Sandborn; David T Rubin; Michael A Kamm; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Bruce E Sands; Severine Vermeire; Julian Panes; Gerhard Rogler; Geert D'Haens; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  HIV/AIDS, chronic diseases and globalisation.

Authors:  Christopher J Colvin
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 7.  EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Nancy J Devlin; Richard Brooks
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  Beyond viral suppression of HIV - the new quality of life frontier.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Lazarus; Kelly Safreed-Harmon; Simon E Barton; Dominique Costagliola; Nikos Dedes; Julia Del Amo Valero; Jose M Gatell; Ricardo Baptista-Leite; Luís Mendão; Kholoud Porter; Stefano Vella; Jürgen Kurt Rockstroh
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Selecting Core Outcomes for Randomised Effectiveness trials In Type 2 diabetes (SCORE-IT): a patient and healthcare professional consensus on a core outcome set for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nicola L Harman; John P H Wilding; Dave Curry; James Harris; Jennifer Logue; R John Pemberton; Leigh Perreault; Gareth Thompson; Sean Tunis; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2019-12-29

Review 10.  Core outcome sets and systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-20
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Psychometric properties of self-reported measures of health-related quality of life in people living with HIV: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zheng Zhu; Yan Hu; Huan Wen; Zhongfang Yang; Shuyu Han; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets: What They are and Why We Need Them.

Authors:  Eleanor M Perfetto; Elisabeth M Oehrlein; T Rosie Love; Silke Schoch; Annie Kennedy; Jennifer Bright
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.