Literature DB >> 33505789

A feasibility study to determine the use of baited pots in Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) fisheries, supported by the use of underwater video observations.

Margaret H Folkins1, Scott M Grant1, Philip Walsh1.   

Abstract

High incidental catches of Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) in Nunavut's Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) fishery has led to studies on the feasibility of capturing Greenland halibut with baited pots. In this study, catch rates among six experimental pots are compared. In addition to this, underwater video observations of Greenland halibut interacting with two of these experimental pot types are quantified in order to help provide recommendations on future pot designs. Catch rates of Greenland halibut differed among pots with different entrance mesh types, and none of the pots produced substantial amounts of bycatch. Strings of pots were deployed within a narrow corridor between baited gillnets targeting Greenland halibut, which may have affected catch results. Video observations revealed Greenland halibut entangled by their teeth significantly more often in entrance funnels constructed with 50 mm than with 19 mm clear monofilament netting and the entrance rate was 45% higher with the 19 mm netting. Greenland halibut that successfully entered a pot repeatedly became entangled by their teeth in 58 mm netting used in the side and end panels and in a horizontal panel used to separate the pot into a lower and upper chamber. The majority (80%) of Greenland halibut were observed to approach a pot against the current. The downstream entrance was aligned with the current in 52% of the observed Greenland halibut approaches. Seventy percent of entry attempts and 67% of successful entries occurred when fish approached against the current and when the entrance was aligned with the current. These observations lead to recommendations that future studies consider developing a four entrance pot to ensure an entrance is always aligned with bottom currents. Based on these observations of entanglements, it is recommended to use 19 mm clear monofilament netting in the entrance funnel, 100 mm polyethylene netting in the exterior panels, and 19 mm polypropylene netting in the horizontal panel when targeting Greenland halibut. Three Greenland sharks were observed interacting with the pots in the video sets, but none were captured or damaged the pots during the potting experiments, providing validity to the use of pots to mitigate the capture of Greenland shark in Nunavut territorial waters. ©2021 Folkins et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviour; Conservation; Fisheries; Fishing gear; Greenland halibut; Nunavut; Sustainability; Underwater video

Year:  2021        PMID: 33505789      PMCID: PMC7789868          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  7 in total

1.  Feeding behaviour of cod, Gadus morhua: activity rhythm and chemically mediated food search.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  A multi-criteria assessment of fishing gear impacts in demersal fisheries.

Authors:  James P Innes; Sean Pascoe
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Will you swim into my parlour? In situ observations of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) interactions with baited pots, with implications for gear design.

Authors:  Phillip Meintzer; Philip Walsh; Brett Favaro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology.

Authors:  Xavier A Harrison; Lynda Donaldson; Maria Eugenia Correa-Cano; Julian Evans; David N Fisher; Cecily E D Goodwin; Beth S Robinson; David J Hodgson; Richard Inger
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) feeding behavior on static fishing gear, effect of SMART (Selective Magnetic and Repellent-Treated) hook deterrent technology, and factors influencing entanglement in bottom longlines.

Authors:  Scott M Grant; Rennie Sullivan; Kevin J Hedges
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Comparing catch efficiency of five models of pot for use in a Newfoundland and Labrador cod fishery.

Authors:  Phillip Meintzer; Philip Walsh; Brett Favaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  First estimates of Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) local abundances in Arctic waters.

Authors:  Brynn M Devine; Laura J Wheeland; Jonathan A D Fisher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Towards the integration of ecophysiology with fisheries stock assessment for conservation policy and evaluating the status of the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  F Falco; T Bottari; S Ragonese; S S Killen
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.252

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.