| Literature DB >> 33505403 |
José María Gutiérrez1, Mariángela Vargas1, Álvaro Segura1, María Herrera1, Mauren Villalta1, Gabriela Solano1, Andrés Sánchez1, Cristina Herrera2, Guillermo León1.
Abstract
There is an urgent need to strengthen the implementation of the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) in the use of experimental animals in toxinological research and in the assessment of the neutralizing efficacy of snake antivenoms. This is a challenging task owing to the inherent complexity of snake venoms. The state of the art on this topic is hereby reviewed, with emphasis on the studies in which a correlation has been observed between in vivo toxicity tests and in vitro surrogate assays, particularly in the study of lethal activity of venoms and its neutralization. Correlations have been described with some venoms-antivenoms when using: (a) enzyme immunoassays, (b) hemagglutination, (c) enzyme assays (proteinase, phospholipase A2), (d) in vitro coagulant effect on plasma, (e) cell culture assays for cytotoxicity, (f) functional assays for assessing neurotoxicity in vitro, (g) use of hens' eggs, and (h) antivenomics. Additionally, the routine introduction of analgesia in these assays and the design of more 'humane' protocols for the lethality test are being pursued. It is expected that the next years will witness a growing awareness of the relevance of the 3Rs principles in antivenom testing, and that new in vitro alternatives and more 'humane' experimental designs will emerge in this field.Entities:
Keywords: 3Rs; analgesia; antivenoms; in vitro assays; lethality assays; neutralization; snake venoms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33505403 PMCID: PMC7829219 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.617429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561