Literature DB >> 33505380

Characterization of Microbial Dynamics and Volatile Metabolome Changes During Fermentation of Chambourcin Hybrid Grapes From Two Pennsylvania Regions.

Hung Li Wang1, Helene Hopfer1,2, Darrell W Cockburn1,3, Josephine Wee1,3.   

Abstract

Microbial diversity present on grapes in wineries, and throughout fermentation has been associated with important metabolites for final wine quality. Although microbiome-metabolome associations have been well characterized and could be used as indicators of wine quality, the impact of regionality on the microbiome and metabolome is not well known. Additionally, studies between microbiome and metabolome have been conducted on single species grape such as Vitis vinifera instead of other species and interspecific hybrids. Although the Pennsylvania wine industry is relatively young compared to California, the industry has been experiencing rapid growth over the past decade and is expected to continue to grow in the future. Pennsylvania's climate of cold winters and high levels of rainfall throughout the growing season favors cultivation of interspecific hybrid grapes such as Vitis ssp. Chambourcin, one of the most commonly grown hybrid varieties in the state. Chambourcin is a prime candidate for studying the impact of regionality on microbiome-metabolome interactions as interspecific hybrid varieties could shape the future of winemaking. Here, we identify for the first time the regional distribution of microbial communities and their interactions with volatile metabolome during fermentation (0-20 days) by integrating high throughput Illumina sequencing (16S and ITS) and headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analyzing 88 samples from nine wineries in the Central and East Pennsylvania regions, we observed high microbial diversity during early stages of fermentation (1-4 days) where non-Saccharomyces yeasts such as Starmerella and Aureobasidium and non-Oenococcus bacteria, Sphingomonas, likely contribute to microbial terroir to the resulting wines. Furthermore, key differentiators between two regions in Pennsylvania, as identified by LEfSe analysis, include the fungal genera Cladosporium and Kazachstania and the bacterial genera Lactococcus and Microbacterium. Moreover, 29 volatile fermentation metabolites were discriminated significantly (variable importance in projection > 1) between the two regions as shown by Partial Least Squares-Discriminant Analysis. Finally, Spearman's correlation identified regional differences of microbial-metabolite associations throughout fermentation that could be used for targeted microbiome manipulation to improve wine quality and preserve regionality. In summary, these results demonstrate the microbial signatures during fermentation and differential microorganisms and metabolites further support impact of regionality on Chambourcin wines in Pennsylvania.
Copyright © 2021 Wang, Hopfer, Cockburn and Wee.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fermentation; hybrid grapes; metabolome; microbiome; wine

Year:  2021        PMID: 33505380      PMCID: PMC7829364          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.614278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


  83 in total

1.  Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples.

Authors:  Alma E Parada; David M Needham; Jed A Fuhrman
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 2.  Lachancea yeast species: Origin, biochemical characteristics and oenological significance.

Authors:  Tristan Jade Porter; Benoit Divol; Mathabatha Evodia Setati
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Investigating the biochemical and fermentation attributes of Lachancea species and strains: Deciphering the potential contribution to wine chemical composition.

Authors:  Tristan Jade Porter; Benoit Divol; Mathabatha Evodia Setati
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.277

4.  The combined effects of storage temperature and packaging on the sensory, chemical, and physical properties of a Cabernet Sauvignon wine.

Authors:  Helene Hopfer; Peter A Buffon; Susan E Ebeler; Hildegarde Heymann
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Candida zemplinina sp. nov., an osmotolerant and psychrotolerant yeast that ferments sweet botrytized wines.

Authors:  Matthias Sipiczki
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Screening wild yeast strains for alcohol fermentation from various fruits.

Authors:  Yeon-Ju Lee; Yu-Ri Choi; So-Young Lee; Jong-Tae Park; Jae-Hoon Shim; Kwan-Hwa Park; Jung-Wan Kim
Journal:  Mycobiology       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  q2-longitudinal: Longitudinal and Paired-Sample Analyses of Microbiome Data.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bokulich; Matthew R Dillon; Yilong Zhang; Jai Ram Rideout; Evan Bolyen; Huilin Li; Paul S Albert; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.496

8.  Major Metabolites and Microbial Community of Fermented Black Glutinous Rice Wine With Different Starters.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Wei Su; Yingchun Mu; Yu Mu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Wine fermentation microbiome: a landscape from different Portuguese wine appellations.

Authors:  Cátia Pinto; Diogo Pinho; Remy Cardoso; Valéria Custódio; Joana Fernandes; Susana Sousa; Miguel Pinheiro; Conceição Egas; Ana C Gomes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Bacterial microbiota diversity and composition in red and white wines correlate with plant-derived DNA contributions and botrytis infection.

Authors:  Alena M Bubeck; Lena Preiss; Anna Jung; Elisabeth Dörner; Daniel Podlesny; Marija Kulis; Cynthia Maddox; Cesar Arze; Christian Zörb; Nikolaus Merkt; W Florian Fricke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.