| Literature DB >> 33505245 |
Chunmei Jin1,2, Hyojin Kang3, Taesun Yoo4, Jae Ryun Ryu5, Ye-Eun Yoo6, Ruiying Ma1,2, Yinhua Zhang1,2, Hyae Rim Kang1,2, Yoonhee Kim1, Hyunyoung Seong1, Geul Bang7,8, Sangwoo Park7, Seok-Kyu Kwon9, Woong Sun2,5, Hyunkyung Kim2,10, Jin Young Kim7, Eunjoon Kim4,6, Kihoon Han1,2.
Abstract
Variants of the SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains 3 (SHANK3), which encodes postsynaptic scaffolds, are associated with brain disorders. The targeted alleles in a few Shank3 knock-out (KO) lines contain a neomycin resistance (Neo) cassette, which may perturb the normal expression of neighboring genes; however, this has not been investigated in detail. We previously reported an unexpected increase in the mRNA expression of Shank3 exons 1-12 in the brains of Shank3B KO mice generated by replacing Shank3 exons 13-16 with the Neo cassette. In this study, we confirmed that the increased Shank3 mRNA in Shank3B KO brains produced an unusual ∼60 kDa Shank3 isoform (Shank3-N), which did not properly localize to the synaptic compartment. Functionally, Shank3-N overexpression altered the dendritic spine morphology in cultured neurons. Importantly, Shank3-N expression in Shank3B KO mice was not a compensatory response to a reduction of full-length Shank3 because expression was still detected in the brain after normalizing the level of full-length Shank3. Moreover, in another Shank3 KO line (Shank3 gKO) with a similar Shank3 exonal deletion as that in Shank3B KO mice but without a Neo cassette, the mRNA expression levels of Shank3 exons 1-12 were lower than those of wild-type mice and Shank3-N was not detected in the brain. In addition, the expression levels of genes neighboring Shank3 on chromosome 15 were altered in the striatum of Shank3B KO but not Shank3 gKO mice. These results suggest that the Neo cassette has potential off-target effects in Shank3B KO mice.Entities:
Keywords: Neo cassette; Shank3B knock-out; gene expression; mouse chromosome 15; off-target effect
Year: 2021 PMID: 33505245 PMCID: PMC7831789 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.614435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5099 Impact factor: 5.639