Literature DB >> 33505103

Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems.

Jan Deriu1, Alvaro Rodrigo2, Arantxa Otegi3, Guillermo Echegoyen2, Sophie Rosset4, Eneko Agirre3, Mark Cieliebak1.   

Abstract

In this paper, we survey the methods and concepts developed for the evaluation of dialogue systems. Evaluation, in and of itself, is a crucial part during the development process. Often, dialogue systems are evaluated by means of human evaluations and questionnaires. However, this tends to be very cost- and time-intensive. Thus, much work has been put into finding methods which allow a reduction in involvement of human labour. In this survey, we present the main concepts and methods. For this, we differentiate between the various classes of dialogue systems (task-oriented, conversational, and question-answering dialogue systems). We cover each class by introducing the main technologies developed for the dialogue systems and then present the evaluation methods regarding that class.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chatbots; Conversational AI; Dialogue systems; Discourse model; Evaluation metrics

Year:  2020        PMID: 33505103      PMCID: PMC7817575          DOI: 10.1007/s10462-020-09866-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Rev        ISSN: 0269-2821            Impact factor:   8.139


  2 in total

1.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  A passage retrieval method based on probabilistic information retrieval model and UMLS concepts in biomedical question answering.

Authors:  Mourad Sarrouti; Said Ouatik El Alaoui
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.317

  2 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Conversational Agents: Goals, Technologies, Vision and Challenges.

Authors:  Merav Allouch; Amos Azaria; Rina Azoulay
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  A dynamic goal adapted task oriented dialogue agent.

Authors:  Abhisek Tiwari; Tulika Saha; Sriparna Saha; Shubhashis Sengupta; Anutosh Maitra; Roshni Ramnani; Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Understanding Is a Process.

Authors:  Leslie M Blaha; Mitchell Abrams; Sarah A Bibyk; Claire Bonial; Beth M Hartzler; Christopher D Hsu; Sangeet Khemlani; Jayde King; Robert St Amant; J Gregory Trafton; Rachel Wong
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 4.  A systematic literature review on persuasive technology at the workplace.

Authors:  Kilian Wenker
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.