Literature DB >> 33504940

Focal therapy compared to radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score-matched study.

Taimur T Shah1,2, Deepika Reddy3,4, Max Peters5, Daniel Ball4, Na Hyun Kim4, Enrique Gomez Gomez6, Saiful Miah7, David Eldred Evans3,4, Stephanie Guillaumier8, Peter S N van Rossum5, Marieke J Van Son5, Feargus Hosking-Jervis3, Tim Dudderidge9, Richard Hindley10, Amr Emara10, Stuart McCracken11,12, Damian Greene13, Raj Nigam14, Neil McCartan8, Massimo Valerio15, Suks Minhas4, Naveed Afzal16, Henry Lewi17, Chris Ogden18, Raj Persad19, Jaspal Virdi20, Caroline M Moore8, Manit Arya4,8, Mark Emberton8, Hashim U Ahmed3,4, Mathias Winkler3,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Focal therapy (FT) ablates areas of prostate cancer rather than treating the whole gland. We compared oncological outcomes of FT to radical prostatectomy (RP).
METHODS: Using prospective multicentre databases of 761 FT and 572 RP cases (November/2005-September/2018), patients with PSA < 20 ng/ml, Gleason </= 4 + 3 and stage </= T2c were 1-1 propensity score-matched for treatment year, age, PSA, Gleason, T-stage, cancer core length and use of neoadjuvant hormones. FT included 1-2 sessions. Primary outcome was failure-free survival (FFS) defined by need for salvage local or systemic therapy or metastases. Differences in FFS were determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test.
RESULTS: 335 radical prostatectomy and 501 focal therapy patients were eligible for matching. For focal therapy, 420 had HIFU and 81 cryotherapy. Cryotherapy was used predominantly for anterior cancer. After matching, 246 RP and 246 FT cases were identified. For radical prostatectomy, mean (SD) age was 63.4 (5.6) years, median (IQR) PSA 7.9 g/ml (6-10) and median (IQR) follow-up 64 (30-89) months. For focal therapy, these were 63.3 (6.9) years, 7.9 ng/ml (5.5-10.6) and 49 [34-67] months, respectively. At 3, 5 and 8 years, FFS (95%CI) was 86% (81-91%), 82% (77-88%) and 79% (73-86%) for radical prostatectomy compared to 91% (87-95%), 86% (81-92%) and 83% (76-90%) following focal therapy (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-metastatic low- intermediate prostate cancer, oncological outcomes over 8 years were similar between focal therapy and radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33504940     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-020-00315-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  7 in total

Review 1.  Focal prostate cancer therapy in the era of multiparametric MRI: a review of options and outcomes.

Authors:  John R Heard; Aurash Naser-Tavakolian; Michael Nazmifar; Michael Ahdoot
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.455

2.  Prostate Cancer: a comparison of focal therapy and radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 3.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer - Current status.

Authors:  Shrikanth Atluri; Ali Mouzannar; Vivek Venkatramani; Dipen J Parekh; Bruno Nahar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-01-01

4.  High-Intensity Focused-Ultrasound Focal Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Oncological and Functional Outcomes in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Łukasz Nyk; Wojciech Michalak; Stanisław Szempliński; Rafał Woźniak; Bartłomiej Zagożdżon; Wojciech Krajewski; Piotr Kryst; Hubert Kamecki; Sławomir Poletajew
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 5.  The use of advanced imaging in guiding the further investigation and treatment of primary prostate cancer.

Authors:  Heying Duan; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 6.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: what is really needed to move from investigational to valid therapeutic alternative?-a narrative review.

Authors:  Antony Pellegrino; Giuseppe O Cirulli; Elio Mazzone; Francesco Barletta; Simone Scuderi; Mario de Angelis; Giuseppe Rosiello; Giorgio Gandaglia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Armando Stabile
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

Review 7.  Applications of Focused Ultrasound in the Treatment of Genitourinary Cancers.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.