Literature DB >> 33504625

Do differences in work disability duration by interjurisdictional claim status vary by industry and jurisdictional context?

Robert A Macpherson1, Mieke Koehoorn2, Barbara Neis3, Christopher B McLeod2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether differences in work disability duration between out-of-province and within-province workers differed by industry and jurisdictional context.
METHODS: Workers' compensation data were used to identify comparable lost time, work-related injury and musculoskeletal disorder claims accepted in six Canadian jurisdictions between 2006 and 2015. Out-of-province workers were identified as workers who filed claims in a different provincial jurisdiction to their province of residence. Coarsened exact matching was used to match out-of-province workers with within-province workers based on observable characteristics. Quantile regression models were used to estimate differences in cumulative disability days paid between out-of-province workers and within-province workers at different percentiles in the disability distribution, adjusting for confounders.
RESULTS: Compared with within-province workers, out-of-province workers were paid more disability days even after matching and adjusting on observable characteristics. Differences between the two groups of workers were observed for short-duration, medium-duration and long-duration claims (differences of 1.57, 6.39, 21.42, 46.43 days at the 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles, respectively). Industry-specific models showed that differences were largest in construction, transportation and warehousing, and mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction. Jurisdiction-specific models showed that differences were largest in the western provinces where out-of-province workers were concentrated in those sectors.
CONCLUSIONS: Out-of-province workers are a vulnerable group with respect to risk of longer work disability duration. Workers' compensation systems, employers and healthcare providers may need to tailor specific interventions for these types of workers, particularly those employed in resource economy-dependent regions that are far from their regions of residence. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; migrant workers; musculoskeletal; rehabilitation; sickness absence

Year:  2021        PMID: 33504625     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  4 in total

1.  Framing the Care of Injured Workers: An Empirical Four-Jurisdictional Comparison of Workers' Compensation Boards' Healthcare Policies.

Authors:  Anne Hudon; Ellen MacEachen; Katherine Lippel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-17

2.  Differences in Work Disability Duration for Immigrants and Canadian-Born Workers in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Sonja Senthanar; Mieke Koehoorn; Lillian Tamburic; Stephanie Premji; Ute Bültmann; Christopher B McLeod
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Evaluating effectiveness of an integrated return-to-work and vocational rehabilitation program on work disability duration in the construction sector.

Authors:  Robert A Macpherson; Ailin He; Benjamin C Amick Iii; Mieke Koehoorn; Christopher B McLeod
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.492

4.  Immigrant status, gender and work disability duration: findings from a linked, retrospective cohort of workers' compensation and immigration data from British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Niloufar Saffari; Sonja Senthanar; Mieke Koehoorn; Kimberlyn McGrail; Christopher McLeod
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.