Literature DB >> 33504513

Antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Matthias Bossard1, Peggy Gao2, William Boden3,4, Gabriel Steg5, Jean-Francois Tanguay6, Cam Joyner7, Christopher B Granger8, Adnan Kastrati9, David Faxon10, Andrzej Budaj11, Prem Pais12, Giuseppe Di Pasquale13, Vicent Valentin14, Marcus Flather15, Tiziano Moccetti16, Salim Yusuf2,17, Shamir R Mehta18,19.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have no obstructive coronary artery disease. The prognosis and role of intensified antiplatelet therapy in those patients were evaluated.
METHODS: We analysed data from the Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events-Seventh Organisation to Assess Strategies in Ischaemic Symptoms trial randomising patients with ACS referred for early intervention to receive either double-dose (600 mg, day 1; 150 mg, days 2-7; then 75 mg/day) or standard-dose (300 mg, day 1; then 75 mg/day) clopidogrel. Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus those with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and their relation to standard-dose versus double-dose clopidogrel were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 days.
RESULTS: We included 23 783 patients with MI and 1599 (6.7%) with MINOCA. Patients with MINOCA were younger, presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation MI and had fewer comorbidities. All-cause mortality (0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), CV mortality (0.6% vs 2.2%, p=0.006), repeat MI (0.5% vs 2.3%, p=0.001) and major bleeding (0.6% vs 2.4%, p<0.0001) were lower among patients with MINOCA than among those with obstructive CAD. Among patients with MINOCA, 2.1% of patients in the double-dose clopidogrel group and 0.6% in the standard-dose group experienced a primary outcome (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 9.76), whereas in those with obstructive CAD, rates were 4.3% and 4.7%, respectively (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p value for interaction=0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MINOCA are at lower risk of recurrent CV events compared with patients with MI with obstructive CAD. Compared with a standard clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen, an intensified dosing strategy appears to offer no additional benefit with a signal of possible harm. Further randomised trials evaluating the effects of potent DAPT in patients with MINOCA are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00335452. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute coronary syndromes; acute myocardial infarction; coronary artery disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33504513     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With MINOCA.

Authors:  Luis Ortega-Paz; Mattia Galli; Davide Capodanno; Salvatore Brugaletta; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 2.  Coronary functional assessment in non-obstructive coronary artery disease: Present situation and future direction.

Authors:  Changlin Zhai; Hongyan Fan; Yujuan Zhu; Yunqing Chen; Liang Shen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.