Literature DB >> 33503971

A Mathematical Model to Estimate Chemotherapy Concentration at the Tumor-Site and Predict Therapy Response in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases.

Daniel A Anaya1, Prashant Dogra2, Zhihui Wang2, Mintallah Haider1, Jasmina Ehab1, Daniel K Jeong3, Masoumeh Ghayouri3, Gregory Y Lauwers3, Kerry Thomas3, Richard Kim1, Joseph D Butner2, Sara Nizzero2, Javier Ruiz Ramírez2, Marija Plodinec4, Richard L Sidman5, Webster K Cavenee6, Renata Pasqualini7, Wadih Arap8, Jason B Fleming1, Vittorio Cristini2.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy remains a primary treatment for metastatic cancer, with tumor response being the benchmark outcome marker. However, therapeutic response in cancer is unpredictable due to heterogeneity in drug delivery from systemic circulation to solid tumors. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated chemotherapy concentration at the tumor-site and its association with therapy response by applying a mathematical model. By using pre-treatment imaging, clinical and biologic variables, and chemotherapy regimen to inform the model, we estimated tumor-site chemotherapy concentration in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases, who received treatment prior to surgical hepatic resection with curative-intent. The differential response to therapy in resected specimens, measured with the gold-standard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG; from 1, complete response to 5, no response) was examined, relative to the model predicted systemic and tumor-site chemotherapy concentrations. We found that the average calculated plasma concentration of the cytotoxic drug was essentially equivalent across patients exhibiting different TRGs, while the estimated tumor-site chemotherapeutic concentration (eTSCC) showed a quadratic decline from TRG = 1 to TRG = 5 (p < 0.001). The eTSCC was significantly lower than the observed plasma concentration and dropped by a factor of ~5 between patients with complete response (TRG = 1) and those with no response (TRG = 5), while the plasma concentration remained stable across TRG groups. TRG variations were driven and predicted by differences in tumor perfusion and eTSCC. If confirmed in carefully planned prospective studies, these findings will form the basis of a paradigm shift in the care of patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFOX; chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; liver metastases; mathematical model

Year:  2021        PMID: 33503971      PMCID: PMC7866038          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  59 in total

1.  Importance of histological tumor response assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery.

Authors:  L Rubbia-Brandt; E Giostra; C Brezault; A D Roth; A Andres; V Audard; P Sartoretti; B Dousset; P E Majno; O Soubrane; S Chaussade; G Mentha; B Terris
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Penetration of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in multicellular layers of human colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Mi-Sun Choi; Soo-Hyun Kim; Hyo-Jeong Kuh
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Proposed revision of the esophageal cancer staging system to accommodate pathologic response (pP) following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT).

Authors:  Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Tsung T Wu; Arlene M Correa; Jaffer A Ajani; Ritsuko R Komaki; Lucian Chirieac; Kelly K Hunt; Zhongxing Liao; Alexandria Phan; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Intra-tumoral heterogeneity of gemcitabine delivery and mass transport in human pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Flavio E Baio; Alexander Ondari; Mark J Truty; Vittorio Cristini; Ryan M Thomas; Rong Chen; Deyali Chatterjee; Ya'an Kang; Joy Zhang; Laurence Court; Priya R Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Aliya Qayyum; Christopher H Crane; Milind Javle; Matthew H Katz; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Marc A Rozner; Haifa Shen; Jeffrey E Lee; Huamin Wang; Yuling Chen; William Plunkett; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; Anirban Maitra; Mauro Ferrari; Gauri R Varadhachary; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Multidrug Cancer Therapy in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Evolution-Based Strategy.

Authors:  Jeffrey B West; Mina N Dinh; Joel S Brown; Jingsong Zhang; Alexander R Anderson; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Improved tumor oxygenation and survival in glioblastoma patients who show increased blood perfusion after cediranib and chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Kyrre E Emblem; Dan G Duda; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Matija Snuderl; Marek Ancukiewicz; Pavlina Polaskova; Marco C Pinho; Dominique Jennings; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew S Chi; April F Eichler; Jorg Dietrich; Fred H Hochberg; Christine Lu-Emerson; A John Iafrate; S Percy Ivy; Bruce R Rosen; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; A Greg Sorensen; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model.

Authors:  R M Sutherland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An experimental and mathematical model for the extravascular transport of a DNA intercalator in tumours.

Authors:  K O Hicks; S J Ohms; P L van Zijl; W A Denny; P J Hunter; W R Wilson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy.

Authors:  Eric A Collisson; Anguraj Sadanandam; Peter Olson; William J Gibb; Morgan Truitt; Shenda Gu; Janine Cooc; Jennifer Weinkle; Grace E Kim; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; Andrew H Ko; Adam B Olshen; Kathleen L Danenberg; Margaret A Tempero; Paul T Spellman; Douglas Hanahan; Joe W Gray
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Establishing the effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticle properties on in vivo disposition using imaging-based pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Prashant Dogra; Natalie L Adolphi; Zhihui Wang; Yu-Shen Lin; Kimberly S Butler; Paul N Durfee; Jonas G Croissant; Achraf Noureddine; Eric N Coker; Elaine L Bearer; Vittorio Cristini; C Jeffrey Brinker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Early prediction of clinical response to checkpoint inhibitor therapy in human solid tumors through mathematical modeling.

Authors:  Joseph D Butner; Geoffrey V Martin; Zhihui Wang; Eugene J Koay; Bruna Corradetti; Mauro Ferrari; Nestor Esnaola; Caroline Chung; David S Hong; James W Welsh; Naomi Hasegawa; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Steven A Curley; Shu-Hsia Chen; Ping-Ying Pan; Steven K Libutti; Shridar Ganesan; Richard L Sidman; Renata Pasqualini; Wadih Arap; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.