| Literature DB >> 33502684 |
Jun Liu1, Junchen Chen1, Yadan Zhong1,2, Xiaoling Yu1, Ping Lu1, Jianqi Feng2, Xin Zhang2, Shufeng Ma2, Chao Yang1, Bin Yang3, Zhili Rong4,5,6.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33502684 PMCID: PMC8310549 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-020-00818-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Cell ISSN: 1674-800X Impact factor: 14.870
Figure 1Enhanced differentiation and proliferation of basal keratinocytes in PLCA patients with OSMR mutations and in Osmr
−/− mice. (A) Top-ranked enriched Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes in PLCA patients with OSMR mutations versus healthy controls. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis showing increased expression of FLG and LOR in PLCA skin lesion. Scale bars, 200 µm and 50 µm (inset). (C) Immunofluorescence analysis showing increased expression of Ki67 in basal keratinocytes of PLCA skin lesion. Scale bars, 50 µm. (D) Quantification of Ki67+ basal keratinocytes. Data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). (E) Schematic of knockout strategy for Osmr−/− mice. (F) Verification of Osmr−/− mice using Sanger sequencing. (G) Hematoxylin & Eosin staining of WT and Osmr−/− mice tail skin. Representative images of three litters (post-natal day 30 (P30); n = 19, males = 10, females = 9) with 5–8 mice per litter. Scale bar, 100 μm. (H) Quantification of epidermal thickness on P30. (I) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of differential expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes in dorsal epidermis from WT and Osmr−/− mice. (J) Western blot analysis of keratinocyte differentiation-related proteins using lysate of WT and Osmr−/− mice skin. Representative images of three biological replicates. (K) 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation analysis. Integrin α6 and EdU were stained in tail skin from WT and Osmr−/− mice 48 h after EdU administration. Scale bar, 50 μm. (L) Quantification of EdU+ basal keratinocytes. Data are mean ± SD from three independent experiments. **P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Figure 2OSMRβ mutants enhance keratinocyte differentiation via losing the function to activate the OSM/OSMRβ/STAT5/KLF7 axis.
(A) OSM inhibits KRT1, KRT10, FLG, and LOR expression. Western blot of HaCaT cells stimulated with 10 ng/mL OSM or 100 ng/mL IL-31 for 72 h. (B) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of differential expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes in primary keratinocytes with or without OSM stimulation. (C) Immunofluorescence analysis showing decreased expression of FLG and LOR in OSM-treated 3D skin. Scale bars, 10 µm. (D) Knockout of OSMR in HaCaT cells ameliorates the OSM-induced expression decrease of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes. (E) Western blot of indicated proteins in HaCaT cells and OSMR-knockout HaCaT cells stimulated with 10 ng/mL OSM for 15 min. (F) Pretreatment with a STAT5 inhibitor rescues the OSM-induced decreased expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes. (G) Volcano plot comparing the p value versus fold change for HaCaT cells treated with or without OSM. Green and red dots represent genes with a p < 0.05 and >2-fold change. (H) Western blot of OSM-treated HaCaT cells showing increased expression of KLF7 protein. (I) ChIP-qPCR analysis with an anti-STAT5 antibody in HaCaT cells treated with IL-31 or OSM. (J) Luciferase reporter assay of the KLF7 promoter showing the requirement of STAT5 activation for OSM-induced KLF7 expression. (K) Western blot showing no KLF7 expression in two independent KLF7-knockout HaCaT cell clones. (L) KLF7 knockout rescues the OSM-induced decreased expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes. (M) OSMR p.G513D and p.P694L are partial loss-of-function mutants. Western blot of OSMR-knockout HaCaT cells transduced with indicated OSMR mutants. (N) Both OSMR p.G513D and p.P694L mutations rescue the OSM-induced decreased expression of keratinocyte differentiation-related genes. For (A, E, F, H, K, and M), representative images of three biological replicates are shown, and quantification of each immunoblotting was labeled under each band (Online methods for detailed information); For (D, I, J, L, and N), data are mean ± SEM, n = 3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)