Hussam Mahmoud Sheta1, Sören Möller2, Laurits Juhl Heinsen3, Koen Nieman4, Thomas Thomsen3, Kenneth Egstrup3, Jess Lambrechtsen3. 1. Department of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark. Hussam.sheta@rsyd.dk. 2. OPEN-Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 3. Department of Medical Research, OUH Svendborg Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research, Valdemarsgade 53, 5700, Svendborg, Denmark. 4. Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics of the culprit lesions compared to non-culprit lesions in patients with non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction using dual energy computed tomography (DECT). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 29 patients, we identified 29 culprit lesions and 227 non-culprit lesions. Quantitative values such as the effective atomic number (effective-Z) and Hounsfield Units (HU) values were measured. Furthermore, all the lesions were characterised using characteristics such as composition (non-calcified, predominantly-non-calcified, predominantly-calcified, or calcified), presence of spotty calcification, remodelling index, and napkin ring sign. The mean effective-Z and HU values were significantly lower in culprit lesions than in non-culprit lesions (8.99 ± 1.21 vs 9.79 ± 1.52; p = 0.0066 and 87.41 ± 84.97 vs. 154.45 ± 176.13; p = 0.0447). The culprit lesions had a higher frequency of non-calcified plaques and predominantly non-calcified plaques, and were with a greater presence of napkin ring signs in comparison with non-culprit lesions. There were no differences in the presence of spotty calcification or remodelling index. By adding effective-Z to plaque characteristics such as non-calcified, positive remodelling, spotty calcification, and napkin rings we observed a significant increased sensitivity of detecting culprit lesions (65.5% vs.44.8%), but no significant changes in area under curve (AUC). CONCLUSION: The use of DECT adds new information of the plaque composition expressed by the effective-Z, which differs significantly in culprit lesions in comparison with non-culprit lesions. The use of the effective-Z improves the diagnostic sensitivity in detection of culprit lesions.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics of the culprit lesions compared to non-culprit lesions in patients with non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction using dual energy computed tomography (DECT). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 29 patients, we identified 29 culprit lesions and 227 non-culprit lesions. Quantitative values such as the effective atomic number (effective-Z) and Hounsfield Units (HU) values were measured. Furthermore, all the lesions were characterised using characteristics such as composition (non-calcified, predominantly-non-calcified, predominantly-calcified, or calcified), presence of spottycalcification, remodelling index, and napkin ring sign. The mean effective-Z and HU values were significantly lower in culprit lesions than in non-culprit lesions (8.99 ± 1.21 vs 9.79 ± 1.52; p = 0.0066 and 87.41 ± 84.97 vs. 154.45 ± 176.13; p = 0.0447). The culprit lesions had a higher frequency of non-calcified plaques and predominantly non-calcified plaques, and were with a greater presence of napkin ring signs in comparison with non-culprit lesions. There were no differences in the presence of spottycalcification or remodelling index. By adding effective-Z to plaque characteristics such as non-calcified, positive remodelling, spottycalcification, and napkin rings we observed a significant increased sensitivity of detecting culprit lesions (65.5% vs.44.8%), but no significant changes in area under curve (AUC). CONCLUSION: The use of DECT adds new information of the plaque composition expressed by the effective-Z, which differs significantly in culprit lesions in comparison with non-culprit lesions. The use of the effective-Z improves the diagnostic sensitivity in detection of culprit lesions.