| Literature DB >> 33502646 |
Zine-Eddine Khene1, Gilles Dosin2, Benoit Peyronnet2, Anis Gasmi2, Nicolas Doumerc3, Idir Ouzaid4, Benjamin Pradere5, Marie Brassier2, Mathieu Roumiguié3, Romain Mathieu2, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq6, Jay D Raman7, Shahrokh Shariat5, Karim Bensalah2.
Abstract
To investigate the association of adherent perinephric fat (APF) with perioperative outcomes, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to clarify the impact of APF in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. A systematic literature search using the Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed in April 2019 and updated in November 2019 to identify studies investigating the effect of APF on perioperative outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy with the aim of evaluating its impact on intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A total of 1534 patients in nine nonrandomized, observational studies met our inclusion criteria. Patients with APF were significantly older (p = 0.0001), had a higher BMI (p = 0.0001) and were predominately male (p = 0.003). APF was associated with a higher operative time (p = 0.001) and higher blood loss (p = 0.002). No significant impact of APF was found in terms of postoperative complications, positive margins or length of stay. APF was also found to be associated with malignant renal histology of RCC on final pathology (p = 0.005). APF was associated with some adverse perioperative outcomes, especially a prolonged operating time and higher blood loss. In addition, APF was also associated with underlying renal malignancy, but the precise causal mechanism requires further exploration.Entities:
Keywords: Adherent perinephric fat; Complications; Kidney cancer; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma; Robotic surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33502646 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01871-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Oncol ISSN: 1341-9625 Impact factor: 3.402