Literature DB >> 33502276

Comparison of flipped learning and traditional lecture method for teaching digestive system diseases in undergraduate medicine: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial.

Manuel Hernández-Guerra1, Enrique Quintero1, Dalia Elena Morales-Arráez1, Angel Carrillo-Pallarés2, David Nicolás-Pérez1, Marta Carrillo-Palau1, Antonio Gimeno-García1, Carlos González-Alayón1, Onofre Alarcón1, Elena Otón-Nieto1, Hermógenes Díaz-Luis2, Norberto Hernández-Siverio2, Antonio Martín-Malagón2, Ivan Arteaga-González2, Alberto Bravo-Gutiérrez2, Maria-Nieves Lorenzo-Rocha2, Julio Jordán-Balanza2, Juan Manuel Sánchez-González2, Manuel Barrera-Gómez2, Ashley Reid3, Nephtali Marina3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the effects of a large-scale flipped learning (FL) approach in an undergraduate course of Digestive System Diseases.
METHODS: This prospective non-randomized trial recruited 404 students over three academic years. In 2016, the course was taught entirely in a Traditional Lecture (TL) style, in 2017 half of the course (Medical topics) was replaced by FL while the remaining half (Surgical topics) was taught by TL and in 2018, the whole course was taught entirely by FL. Academic performance, class attendance and student's satisfaction surveys were compared between cohorts.
RESULTS: Test scores were higher in the FL module (Medical) than in the TL module (Surgical) in the 2017 cohort but were not different when both components were taught entirely by TL (2016) or by FL (2018). Also, FL increased the probability of reaching superior grades (scores >7.0) and improved class attendance and students' satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: The holistic FL model is more effective for teaching undergraduate clinical gastroenterology compared to traditional teaching methods and has a positive impact on classroom attendances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flipped learning; absenteeism; class attendance; peer instruction; student engagement; traditional learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 33502276     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1867312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  2 in total

1.  The past, the present, and the future of flipped teaching.

Authors:  Chaya Gopalan; Sheyenne Daughrity; Elizabeth Hackmann
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.396

2.  Flipped Classroom (FCR) as an Effective Teaching-Learning Module for a Large Classroom: A Mixed-Method Approach.

Authors:  Manpreet Kaur; Soumen Manna; Himani Ahluwalia; Manasi Bhattacharjee
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.