Kellee Parker1, Erika Cottrell2, Linda Stork1, Susan Lindemulder1. 1. Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 2. Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Within pediatric oncology, parental decision making regarding participation in clinical trials that aim to reduce therapy to mitigate side effects is not well studied. The recently completed Children's Oncology Group trial for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AALL0932) included a reduction in maintenance therapy, and required consent for randomization immediately prior to starting maintenance. At our institution, 40% of children enrolled on AALL0932 were withdrawn from protocol therapy prior to randomization due to parental choice. This study sought to identify factors that impacted parental decision making regarding randomization on AALL0932. PROCEDURE: Parents of children enrolled on AALL0932 at our institution were eligible if their child met criteria for the average-risk randomization. Parents were invited to participate in a 30-50-minute phone interview. Questions focused on factors that shaped parental decision making about randomization, as well as their perspectives about the clinical trial experience more generally. RESULTS: Fear of receiving less therapy and subsequent relapse was the predominant reason to decline randomization. Reasons given for consenting to randomization included trust in the physician, altruism, hope for less therapy, and potential for fewer side effects. Parents also reflected on ways to support future families making decisions about clinical trial participation. CONCLUSION: While many parents recognize the importance of clinical trials aiming to mitigate side effects, the fear of their own child relapsing with less than standard therapy may dissuade them from study participation. Recognizing and addressing these concerns will be important for enrollment and retention in future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: Within pediatric oncology, parental decision making regarding participation in clinical trials that aim to reduce therapy to mitigate side effects is not well studied. The recently completed Children's Oncology Group trial for standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (AALL0932) included a reduction in maintenance therapy, and required consent for randomization immediately prior to starting maintenance. At our institution, 40% of children enrolled on AALL0932 were withdrawn from protocol therapy prior to randomization due to parental choice. This study sought to identify factors that impacted parental decision making regarding randomization on AALL0932. PROCEDURE: Parents of children enrolled on AALL0932 at our institution were eligible if their child met criteria for the average-risk randomization. Parents were invited to participate in a 30-50-minute phone interview. Questions focused on factors that shaped parental decision making about randomization, as well as their perspectives about the clinical trial experience more generally. RESULTS: Fear of receiving less therapy and subsequent relapse was the predominant reason to decline randomization. Reasons given for consenting to randomization included trust in the physician, altruism, hope for less therapy, and potential for fewer side effects. Parents also reflected on ways to support future families making decisions about clinical trial participation. CONCLUSION: While many parents recognize the importance of clinical trials aiming to mitigate side effects, the fear of their own child relapsing with less than standard therapy may dissuade them from study participation. Recognizing and addressing these concerns will be important for enrollment and retention in future clinical trials.
Authors: Yousif Matloub; Bruce C Bostrom; Stephen P Hunger; Linda C Stork; Anne Angiolillo; Harland Sather; Mei La; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Nyla A Heerema; Scott Sailer; Patrick J Buckley; Blythe Thomson; Catherine Cole; James B Nachman; Gregory Reaman; Naomi Winick; William L Carroll; Meenakshi Devidas; Paul S Gaynon Journal: Blood Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Alejandro Hoberman; Nader Shaikh; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Diana H Kearney; D Kathleen Colborn; Michelle L Kienholz; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Ron Keren; Myra A Carpenter; Saul P Greenfield; Hans G Pohl; Ranjiv Mathews; Marva Moxey-Mims; Russell W Chesney Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Katie A Greenzang; Hasan Al-Sayegh; Clement Ma; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Eve Wittenberg; Jennifer W Mack Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ching-Hon Pui; Jun J Yang; Stephen P Hunger; Rob Pieters; Martin Schrappe; Andrea Biondi; Ajay Vora; André Baruchel; Lewis B Silverman; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Gabriele Escherich; Keizo Horibe; Yves C M Benoit; Shai Izraeli; Allen Eng Juh Yeoh; Der-Cherng Liang; James R Downing; William E Evans; Mary V Relling; Charles G Mullighan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lamia P Barakat; Evelyn Stevens; Yimei Li; Anne Reilly; Janet A Deatrick; Naomi E Goldstein; Lisa A Schwartz Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Stefan Essig; Qiaozhi Li; Yan Chen; Johann Hitzler; Wendy Leisenring; Mark Greenberg; Charles Sklar; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull; Joseph P Neglia; Kevin C Oeffinger; Leslie L Robison; Claudia E Kuehni; Yutaka Yasui; Paul C Nathan Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 41.316