Parth Lodhia1,2, Mark O McConkey3,4, Jordan M Leith3,5, David R Maldonado6, Matthew J Brick7, Benjamin G Domb8. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. parth.lodhia@ubc.ca. 2. Fraser Orthopaedic Institute, 403-233 Nelson's Crescent, New Westminster, BC, V3L 0E4, Canada. parth.lodhia@ubc.ca. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 4. Pacific Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, North Vancouver, BC, Canada. 5. Footbridge Centre for Integrated Orthopaedic Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 6. Kerlan-Jobe Institute, Los Angeles, USA. 7. Orthosports North Harbour, Auckland, New Zealand. 8. American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The last decade has seen a boom in hip arthroscopy with refined indications. Improved understanding of pathoanatomy and disease progression has allowed for the development of advanced techniques. Labral reconstruction has been developed to substitute a non-functional or absent labrum. It has become an important technique in the armamentarium of high-volume arthroscopic hip surgeons. RECENT FINDINGS: Basic science studies have improved understanding of hip biomechanics in the presence and absence of a labrum with a labral reconstruction allowing for reconstitution of normalcy. Current techniques have shown success with autograft and allograft tissue options. While autograft tissue allows for easy access intra-operatively and maintains patient biology, donor site morbidity is possible. Allografts negate donor site morbidity and allow for an abundance of tissue but can be resource-intensive and face availability concerns. Recent studies support outcomes of labral reconstructions using both autograft and allograft. Promising results have also allowed for performing labral reconstruction in a primary setting. Labral reconstruction can be successfully performed using both autograft and allograft. Patient biology should be respected, and native hip biomechanics restored. The literature is plentiful for appropriate surgical decision-making allowing the surgeon with multiple graft choices depending on training, experience, and resources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The last decade has seen a boom in hip arthroscopy with refined indications. Improved understanding of pathoanatomy and disease progression has allowed for the development of advanced techniques. Labral reconstruction has been developed to substitute a non-functional or absent labrum. It has become an important technique in the armamentarium of high-volume arthroscopic hip surgeons. RECENT FINDINGS: Basic science studies have improved understanding of hip biomechanics in the presence and absence of a labrum with a labral reconstruction allowing for reconstitution of normalcy. Current techniques have shown success with autograft and allograft tissue options. While autograft tissue allows for easy access intra-operatively and maintains patient biology, donor site morbidity is possible. Allografts negate donor site morbidity and allow for an abundance of tissue but can be resource-intensive and face availability concerns. Recent studies support outcomes of labral reconstructions using both autograft and allograft. Promising results have also allowed for performing labral reconstruction in a primary setting. Labral reconstruction can be successfully performed using both autograft and allograft. Patient biology should be respected, and native hip biomechanics restored. The literature is plentiful for appropriate surgical decision-making allowing the surgeon with multiple graft choices depending on training, experience, and resources.
Entities:
Keywords:
Graft options; Hip arthroscopy; Hip labrum; Labral reconstruction; Technique
Authors: Jeffrey J Nepple; Marc J Philippon; Kevin J Campbell; Grant J Dornan; Kyle S Jansson; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-09 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Jeffrey J Nepple; Kevin J Campbell; Grant J Dornan; Kyle S Jansson; Robert F LaPrade; Coen A Wijdicks Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Michaela O'Connor; Gabrielle K Steinl; Ajay S Padaki; Kyle R Duchman; Robert W Westermann; T Sean Lynch Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: A J R Palmer; T T Malak; J Broomfield; J Holton; L Majkowski; G E R Thomas; A Taylor; A J Andrade; G Collins; K Watson; A J Carr; S Glyn-Jones Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2016-03-21
Authors: Emma L Klosterman; Anthony J Zacharias; Matthew S Dooley; Nathaniel M Wilson; Elizabeth H G Turner; David C Goodspeed; Andrea M Spiker Journal: Arthrosc Tech Date: 2022-07-25
Authors: Marc Tey-Pons; Bruno Capurro; Raúl Torres-Eguia; Fernando Marqués-López; Alfonso Leon-García; Oliver Marín-Peña Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2021-06-23