Literature DB >> 33501544

The Ethics of Mandatory Retention of Clinical Biospecimens for Research.

David Wendler1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 33501544      PMCID： PMC8390568          DOI： 10.1007/s11606-020-06468-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank.

Authors:  Kyle B Brothers; Daniel R Morrison; Ellen W Clayton
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Are physicians obligated always to act in the patient's best interests?

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Recognition of Research Participants' Need for Autonomy: Remembering the Legacy of Henrietta Lacks.

Authors:  Carrie D Wolinetz; Francis S Collins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk.

Authors:  David S Wendler; Annette Rid
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Louisa A Stark; Joyce Mitchell
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-12-05

6.  Genetics researchers' and IRB professionals' attitudes toward genetic research review: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Edwards; Amy A Lemke; Susan B Trinidad; Susan M Lewis; Helene Starks; Katherine W Snapinn; Mary Quinn Griffin; Georgia L Wiesner; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 8.822
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.