Literature DB >> 33501390

Nasal prosthesis with magnetically secured intranasal framework for a patient with partial rhinectomy and intraoral defects: A case report.

Anjana Kurien1, Megashyam Poundass2, Subha Anirudhan3, Thirumurthy Ramasamy Velliangattur4, Bindhoo Arakonam Yuvaraja5, Arun Masilamani1.   

Abstract

Partial rhinectomy is a challenge for most maxillofacial prosthodontists, as retention of the prosthesis is a major issue to overcome. The scenario becomes even more difficult when there is an intraoral defect. This article describes the fabrication of a removable silicone nasal prosthesis and removable PMMA intraoral obturator prosthesis to rehabilitate a patient following partial rhinectomy with associated loss of premaxilla. The retention of removable intraoral and extraoral prosthesis was achieved partially from anatomical undercuts and further enhanced by rare earth magnets placed between both prostheses. An acrylic framework was fabricated and placed inside to provide rigidity to the nasal part of the prosthesis. A customized method of making impressions using a modified syringe tube to mold the inner surface of the nasal defect is described. The obturator function scale (OFS) questionnaire was used to measure the patient's satisfaction with the obturator. After insertion of the prosthesis, there was an overall improvement in the OFS of the patient. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: This case report documents the rehabilitation of a patient following partial rhinectomy and associated loss of premaxilla with customized intraoral obturator prosthesis and a removable silicone nasal prosthesis. The successful outcome of this case shows that for people with similar orofacial defects, these prostheses are a good option to achieve acceptable esthetics, speech, and function. Copyright: © Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  customized intranasal framework; magnet retained prosthesis; modified syringe tube impression technique; partial rhinectomy; squamous cell carcinoma

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501390      PMCID: PMC7821749     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Transl Res        ISSN: 2382-6533


  22 in total

1.  An intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis using an intermediate framework and magnets: a clinical report.

Authors:  R Brignoni; J T Dominici
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 2.  Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nina Ariani; Anita Visser; Robert P van Oort; Lindawati Kusdhany; Tri Budi W Rahardjo; Bastiaan P Krom; Henry C van der Mei; Arjan Vissink
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Rehabilitation of a patient with an intra oral prosthesis and an extra oral orbital prosthesis retained with magnets.

Authors:  Seema Pattanaik; Aarti P Wadkar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-05-15

4.  Prosthetic complications of extraoral implants.

Authors:  M R Arcuri; W E LaVelle; E Fyler; R Jons
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions.

Authors:  S M Hooper; T Westcott; P L L Evans; A P Bocca; D C Jagger
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Can we assess quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer? A preliminary report from the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics.

Authors:  Donna M Hecker; Jonathan P Wiens; Thomas R Cowper; Steve E Eckert; Christina A Gitto; Rhonda F Jacob; Gordon K Mahanna; Glenn E Turner; Alcine Potts; Henrietta Logan; Ronald L Wiens
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Positioning magnets on a multiple/sectional maxillofacial prosthesis.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Aline Ursula Rocha Fernandes; Daniela Micheline dos Santos; Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão
Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract       Date:  2007-11-01

8.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation of midfacial defects.

Authors:  M T Marunick; R Harrison; J Beumer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 9.  Retention systems used in maxillofacial prostheses: A review.

Authors:  A A Diken Türksayar; S A Saglam; A C Bulut
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Reconstruction of a midfacial defect using an intraoral-extraoral combination prosthesis employing magnets: a clinical report.

Authors:  Anoop Nair; K M Regish; Farhan K Shah; D R Prithviraj
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.