Literature DB >> 33501345

Analysis of Compensatory Movements Using a Supernumerary Robotic Hand for Upper Limb Assistance.

Martina Rossero1,2, Andrea S Ciullo1, Giorgio Grioli1, Manuel G Catalano1, Antonio Bicchi1,2.   

Abstract

Recently, extratheses, aka Supernumerary Robotic Limbs (SRLs), are emerging as a new trend in the field of assistive and rehabilitation devices. We proposed the SoftHand X, a system composed of an anthropomorphic soft hand extrathesis, with a gravity support boom and a control interface for the patient. In preliminary tests, the system exhibited a positive outlook toward assisting impaired people during daily life activities and fighting learned-non-use of the impaired arm. However, similar to many robot-aided therapies, the use of the system may induce side effects that can be detrimental and worsen patients' conditions. One of the most common is the onset of alternative grasping strategies and compensatory movements, which clinicians absolutely need to counter in physical therapy. Before embarking in systematic experimentation with the SoftHand X on patients, it is essential that the system is demonstrated not to lead to an increase of compensation habits. This paper provides a detailed description of the compensatory movements performed by healthy subjects using the SoftHand X. Eleven right-handed healthy subjects were involved within an experimental protocol in which kinematic data of the upper body and EMG signals of the arm were acquired. Each subject executed tasks with and without the robotic system, considering this last situation as reference of optimal behavior. A comparison between two different configurations of the robotic hand was performed to understand if this aspect may affect the compensatory movements. Results demonstrated that the use of the apparatus reduces the range of motion of the wrist, elbow and shoulder, while it increases the range of the trunk and head movements. On the other hand, EMG analysis indicated that muscle activation was very similar among all the conditions. Results obtained suggest that the system may be used as assistive device without causing an over-use of the arm joints, and opens the way to clinical trials with patients.
Copyright © 2020 Rossero, Ciullo, Grioli, Catalano and Bicchi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compensatory movements; kinematic analysis; robotic assistance; soft robotics; supernumerary robotic limbs

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501345      PMCID: PMC7805947          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.587759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  21 in total

Review 1.  What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Jeffrey A Kleim; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Joshua Z Willey; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients.

Authors:  A Roby-Brami; A Feydy; M Combeaud; E V Biryukova; B Bussel; M F Levin
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.209

4.  Novel kinematic indices for quantifying upper limb ability and dexterity after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ana de Los Reyes-Guzmán; Iris Dimbwadyo-Terrer; Soraya Pérez-Nombela; Félix Monasterio-Huelin; Diego Torricelli; José Luis Pons; Angel Gil-Agudo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis.

Authors:  Stella M Michaelsen; Stéphane Jacobs; Agnès Roby-Brami; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation.

Authors:  Paweł Maciejasz; Jörg Eschweiler; Kurt Gerlach-Hahn; Arne Jansen-Troy; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Rebecca L Stine; Craig W Heckathorne; Stefania Fatone; Steven A Gard
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review.

Authors:  Nurdiana Nordin; Sheng Quan Xie; Burkhard Wünsche
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Compensation or Restoration: Closed-Loop Feedback of Movement Quality for Assisted Reach-to-Grasp Exercises with a Multi-Joint Arm Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Florian Grimm; Georgios Naros; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Hearing loss grades and the International classification of functioning, disability and health.

Authors:  Bolajoko O Olusanya; Adrian C Davis; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.