Literature DB >> 33501255

Using Multiple Decomposition Methods and Cluster Analysis to Find and Categorize Typical Patterns of EEG Activity in Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Experiments.

Alexander Frolov1,2, Pavel Bobrov1,2, Elena Biryukova1,2, Mikhail Isaev1,2, Yaroslav Kerechanin1,2, Dmitry Bobrov1, Alexander Lekin1.   

Abstract

In this study, the sources of EEG activity in motor imagery brain-computer interface (BCI) control experiments were investigated. Sixteen linear decomposition methods for EEG source separation were compared according to different criteria. The criteria were mutual information reduction between the source activities and physiological plausibility. The latter was tested by estimating the dipolarity of the source topographic maps, i.e., the accuracy of approximating the map by potential distribution from a single current dipole, as well as by the specificity of the source activity for different motor imagery tasks. The decomposition methods were also compared according to the number of shared components found. The results indicate that most of the dipolar components are found by the Independent Component Analysis Methods AMICA and PWCICA, which also provided the highest information reduction. These two methods also found the most task-specific EEG patterns of the blind source separation algorithms used. They are outperformed only by non-blind Common Spatial Pattern methods in terms of pattern specificity. The components found by all of the methods were clustered using the Attractor Neural Network with Increasing Activity. The results of the cluster analysis revealed the most frequent patterns of electrical activity occurring in the experiments. The patterns reflect blinking, eye movements, sensorimotor rhythm suppression during the motor imagery, and activations in the precuneus, supplementary motor area, and premotor areas of both hemispheres. Overall, multi-method decomposition with subsequent clustering and task-specificity estimation is a viable and informative procedure for processing the recordings of electrophysiological experiments.
Copyright © 2020 Frolov, Bobrov, Biryukova, Isaev, Kerechanin, Bobrov and Lekin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG pattern extraction; blind source separation; brain–computer interface; cluster analysis; common spatial patterns; independent component analysis; motor imagery

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501255      PMCID: PMC7805631          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  30 in total

1.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use an EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Kai Keng Ang; Cuntai Guan; Karen Sui Geok Chua; Beng Ti Ang; Christopher Wee Keong Kuah; Chuanchu Wang; Kok Soon Phua; Zheng Yang Chin; Haihong Zhang
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  A comparison of independent component analysis algorithms and measures to discriminate between EEG and artifact components.

Authors:  Dhani Dharmaprani; Hoang K Nguyen; Trent W Lewis; Dylan DeLosAngeles; John O Willoughby; Kenneth J Pope
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

4.  Blind source separation by nonstationarity of variance: a cumulant-based approach.

Authors:  A Hyvarinen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2001

5.  Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources.

Authors:  T W Lee; M Girolami; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  [Lateralization of EEG Patterns in Humans during Motor Imagery of Arm Movements in the Brain-Computer Interface].

Authors:  A N Vasilyev; S P Liburkina; A Ya Kaplan
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.437

7.  Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study.

Authors:  Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Doris Broetz; Massimiliano Rea; Leonhard Läer; Ozge Yilmaz; Fabricio L Brasil; Giulia Liberati; Marco R Curado; Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Alexandros Vyziotis; Woosang Cho; Manuel Agostini; Ernesto Soares; Surjo Soekadar; Andrea Caria; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis.

Authors:  François Tadel; Sylvain Baillet; John C Mosher; Dimitrios Pantazis; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13

9.  Comparing Different Classifiers in Sensory Motor Brain Computer Interfaces.

Authors:  Hossein Bashashati; Rabab K Ward; Gary E Birch; Ali Bashashati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of EEG-features and classification methods for motor imagery in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Yvonne Höller; Jürgen Bergmann; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Martin Kronbichler; Peter Höller; Julia S Crone; Elisabeth V Schmid; Kevin Butz; Raffaele Nardone; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neural Networks to Recognize Patterns in Topographic Images of Cortical Electrical Activity of Patients with Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Francisco Gerson A de Meneses; Ariel Soares Teles; Monara Nunes; Daniel da Silva Farias; Silmar Teixeira
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.275

2.  Deep Residual Convolutional Neural Networks for Brain-Computer Interface to Visualize Neural Processing of Hand Movements in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Yosuke Fujiwara; Junichi Ushiba
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.387

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.