Literature DB >> 33501187

A Survey on Swarming With Micro Air Vehicles: Fundamental Challenges and Constraints.

Mario Coppola1,2, Kimberly N McGuire1, Christophe De Wagter1, Guido C H E de Croon1.   

Abstract

This work presents a review and discussion of the challenges that must be solved in order to successfully develop swarms of Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) for real world operations. From the discussion, we extract constraints and links that relate the local level MAV capabilities to the global operations of the swarm. These should be taken into account when designing swarm behaviors in order to maximize the utility of the group. At the lowest level, each MAV should operate safely. Robustness is often hailed as a pillar of swarm robotics, and a minimum level of local reliability is needed for it to propagate to the global level. An MAV must be capable of autonomous navigation within an environment with sufficient trustworthiness before the system can be scaled up. Once the operations of the single MAV are sufficiently secured for a task, the subsequent challenge is to allow the MAVs to sense one another within a neighborhood of interest. Relative localization of neighbors is a fundamental part of self-organizing robotic systems, enabling behaviors ranging from basic relative collision avoidance to higher level coordination. This ability, at times taken for granted, also must be sufficiently reliable. Moreover, herein lies a constraint: the design choice of the relative localization sensor has a direct link to the behaviors that the swarm can (and should) perform. Vision-based systems, for instance, force MAVs to fly within the field of view of their camera. Range or communication-based solutions, alternatively, provide omni-directional relative localization, yet can be victim to unobservable conditions under certain flight behaviors, such as parallel flight, and require constant relative excitation. At the swarm level, the final outcome is thus intrinsically influenced by the on-board abilities and sensors of the individual. The real-world behavior and operations of an MAV swarm intrinsically follow in a bottom-up fashion as a result of the local level limitations in cognition, relative knowledge, communication, power, and safety. Taking these local limitations into account when designing a global swarm behavior is key in order to take full advantage of the system, enabling local limitations to become true strengths of the swarm.
Copyright © 2020 Coppola, McGuire, De Wagter and de Croon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAV; autonomous; challenges; drones; micro air vehicles; review; robustness; swarm

Year:  2020        PMID: 33501187      PMCID: PMC7806031          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  27 in total

1.  Abandoning objectives: evolution through the search for novelty alone.

Authors:  Joel Lehman; Kenneth O Stanley
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  To err is robotic, to tolerate immunological: fault detection in multirobot systems.

Authors:  Danesh Tarapore; Pedro U Lima; Jorge Carneiro; Anders Lyhne Christensen
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.956

3.  A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns.

Authors:  Matěj Karásek; Florian T Muijres; Christophe De Wagter; Bart D W Remes; Guido C H E de Croon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management.

Authors:  Amy Hocraffer; Chang S Nam
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments.

Authors:  Gábor Vásárhelyi; Csaba Virágh; Gergő Somorjai; Tamás Nepusz; Agoston E Eiben; Tamás Vicsek
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2018-07-18

6.  AntBot: A six-legged walking robot able to home like desert ants in outdoor environments.

Authors:  Julien Dupeyroux; Julien R Serres; Stéphane Viollet
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles.

Authors:  Yufeng Chen; Huichan Zhao; Jie Mao; Pakpong Chirarattananon; E Farrell Helbling; Nak-Seung Patrick Hyun; David R Clarke; Robert J Wood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Honeybees' speed depends on dorsal as well as lateral, ventral and frontal optic flows.

Authors:  Geoffrey Portelli; Franck Ruffier; Frédéric L Roubieu; Nicolas Franceschini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Airborne Visual Detection and Tracking of Cooperative UAVs Exploiting Deep Learning.

Authors:  Roberto Opromolla; Giuseppe Inchingolo; Giancarmine Fasano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Evolution of Collective Behaviors for a Real Swarm of Aquatic Surface Robots.

Authors:  Miguel Duarte; Vasco Costa; Jorge Gomes; Tiago Rodrigues; Fernando Silva; Sancho Moura Oliveira; Anders Lyhne Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Data-driven CFD Scaling of Bioinspired Mars Flight Vehicles for Hover.

Authors:  Jeremy A Pohly; Chang-Kwon Kang; D Brian Landrum; James E Bluman; Hikaru Aono
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.413

Review 2.  A Survey of Robot Swarms' Relative Localization Method.

Authors:  Siyuan Chen; Dong Yin; Yifeng Niu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 3.847

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.