Literature DB >> 33501056

Evaluation of 3D Printed Soft Robots in Radiation Environments and Comparison With Molded Counterparts.

Osman Dogan Yirmibeşoğlu1, Tyler Oshiro2, Gina Olson1, Camille Palmer2, Yigit Mengüç1.   

Abstract

Robots have an important role during inspection, clean-up, and sample collection in unstructured radiation environments inaccessible to humans. The advantages of soft robots, such as body morphing, high compliance, and energy absorption during impact, make them suitable for operating under extreme conditions. Despite their promise, the usefulness of soft robots under a radiation environment has yet to be assessed. In this work, we evaluate the effectiveness of soft robots fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), a common fabrication material, under radiation for the first time. We investigated gamma-induced mechanical damage in the PDMS materials' mechanical properties, including elongation, tensile strength, and stiffness. We selected three radiation environments from the nuclear industry to represent a wide range of radiation and then submerged a 3D printed hexapus robot into a radiation environment to estimate its operation time. Finally, to test the reliability of the 3D printed soft robots, we compared their performances with molded counterparts. To analyze performance results in detail, we also investigated dimensional errors and the effects of fabrication methods, nozzle size, and print direction on the stiffness of PDMS material. Results of this study show that with increasing exposure to gamma irradiation, the mechanical properties of PDMS decrease in functionality but are minimally impacted up to 20 kGy gamma radiation. Considering the fractional changes to the PDMS mechanical properties, it is safe to assume that soft robots could operate for 12 h in two of the three proposed radiation environments. We also verified that the 3D printed soft robots can perform better than or equal to their molded counterparts while being more reliable.
Copyright © 2019 Yirmibeşoğlu, Oshiro, Olson, Palmer and Mengüç.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; additive manufacturing; nuclear robotics; radiation environments; silicone elastomer; soft actuators; soft robotics

Year:  2019        PMID: 33501056      PMCID: PMC7805716          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  16 in total

1.  3D printing antagonistic systems of artificial muscle using projection stereolithography.

Authors:  Bryan N Peele; Thomas J Wallin; Huichan Zhao; Robert F Shepherd
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.956

Review 2.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots.

Authors:  Daniela Rus; Michael T Tolley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Printing soft matter in three dimensions.

Authors:  Ryan L Truby; Jennifer A Lewis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities.

Authors:  Cecilia Laschi; Barbara Mazzolai; Matteo Cianchetti
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2016-11-16

Review 5.  Elastic Inflatable Actuators for Soft Robotic Applications.

Authors:  Benjamin Gorissen; Dominiek Reynaerts; Satoshi Konishi; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Joon-Wan Kim; Michael De Volder
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 30.849

6.  A Definition of Soft Materials for Use in the Design of Robots.

Authors:  Nikolas Kastor; Vishesh Vikas; Eliad Cohen; Robert D White
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion.

Authors:  Wenqi Hu; Guo Zhan Lum; Massimo Mastrangeli; Metin Sitti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Soft Lithography.

Authors:  Younan Xia; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1998-03-16       Impact factor: 15.336

9.  A New 3D Printing Strategy by Harnessing Deformation, Instability, and Fracture of Viscoelastic Inks.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Yuk; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots.

Authors:  Andrew D Marchese; Robert K Katzschmann; Daniela Rus
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-Time Avoidance of Ionising Radiation Using Layered Costmaps for Mobile Robots.

Authors:  Andrew West; Thomas Wright; Ioannis Tsitsimpelis; Keir Groves; Malcolm J Joyce; Barry Lennox
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  A 3D Printed Modular Soft Gripper Integrated With Metamaterials for Conformal Grasping.

Authors:  Charbel Tawk; Rahim Mutlu; Gursel Alici
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  A Holistic Approach to Human-Supervised Humanoid Robot Operations in Extreme Environments.

Authors:  Murphy Wonsick; Philip Long; Aykut Özgün Önol; Maozhen Wang; Taşkın Padır
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-06-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.