Literature DB >> 33500983

An Adaptive and Hybrid End-Point/Joint Impedance Controller for Lower Limb Exoskeletons.

Serena Maggioni1,2, Nils Reinert2, Lars Lünenburger2, Alejandro Melendez-Calderon1,3,4.   

Abstract

Assist-as-needed (AAN) algorithms for the control of lower extremity rehabilitation robots can promote active participation of patients during training while adapting to their individual performances and impairments. The implementation of such controllers requires the adaptation of a control parameter (often the robot impedance) based on a performance (or error) metric. The choice of how an adaptive impedance controller is formulated implies different challenges and possibilities for controlling the patient's leg movement. In this paper, we analyze the characteristics and limitations of controllers defined in two commonly used formulations: joint and end-point space, exploring especially the implementation of an AAN algorithm. We propose then, as a proof-of-concept, an AAN impedance controller that combines the strengths of working in both spaces: a hybrid joint/end-point impedance controller. This approach gives the possibility to adapt the end-point stiffness in magnitude and direction in order to provide a support that targets the kinematic deviations of the end-point with the appropriate force vector. This controller was implemented on a two-link rehabilitation robot for gait training-the Lokomat®Pro V5 (Hocoma AG, Switzerland) and tested on 5 able-bodied subjects and 1 subject with Spinal Cord Injury. Our experiments show that the hybrid controller is a feasible approach for exoskeleton devices and that it could exploit the benefits of the end-point controller in shaping a desired end-point stiffness and those of the joint controller to promote the correct angular changes in the trajectories of the joints. The adaptation algorithm is able to adapt the end-point stiffness based on the subject's performance in different gait phases, i.e., the robot can render a higher stiffness selectively in the direction and gait phases where the subjects perform with larger kinematic errors. The proposed approach can potentially be generalized to other robotic applications for rehabilitation or assistive purposes.
Copyright © 2018 Maggioni, Reinert, Lünenburger and Melendez-Calderon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lokomat; adaptive control; assist-as-needed; exoskeleton; gait trainer; impedance; rehabilitation; stiffness

Year:  2018        PMID: 33500983      PMCID: PMC7805861          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  34 in total

1.  LOPES II--Design and Evaluation of an Admittance Controlled Gait Training Robot With Shadow-Leg Approach.

Authors:  Jos Meuleman; Edwin van Asseldonk; Gijs van Oort; Hans Rietman; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls.

Authors:  Rezaul Begg; Russell Best; Lisa Dell'Oro; Simon Taylor
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans.

Authors:  F A Mussa-Ivaldi; N Hogan; E Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Robot assisted treadmill training: mechanisms and training strategies.

Authors:  Shahid Hussain; Sheng Quan Xie; Guangyu Liu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Temporal components of the motor patterns expressed by the human spinal cord reflect foot kinematics.

Authors:  Yuri P Ivanenko; Renato Grasso; Myrka Zago; Marco Molinari; Giorgio Scivoletto; Vincenzo Castellano; Velio Macellari; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Intralimb coordination as a sensitive indicator of motor-control impairment after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lea Awai; Armin Curt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton.

Authors:  Bram Koopman; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed.

Authors:  Jeremy L Emken; Raul Benitez; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  A pilot study on the feasibility of robot-aided leg motor training to facilitate active participation.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Rajiv Ranganathan; Yasin Y Dhaher; William Z Rymer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.