Literature DB >> 33500902

Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account.

Filippo Santoni de Sio1, Jeroen van den Hoven1.   

Abstract

Debates on lethal autonomous weapon systems have proliferated in the past 5 years. Ethical concerns have been voiced about a possible raise in the number of wrongs and crimes in military operations and about the creation of a "responsibility gap" for harms caused by these systems. To address these concerns, the principle of "meaningful human control" has been introduced in the legal-political debate; according to this principle, humans not computers and their algorithms should ultimately remain in control of, and thus morally responsible for, relevant decisions about (lethal) military operations. However, policy-makers and technical designers lack a detailed theory of what "meaningful human control" exactly means. In this paper, we lay the foundation of a philosophical account of meaningful human control, based on the concept of "guidance control" as elaborated in the philosophical debate on free will and moral responsibility. Following the ideals of "Responsible Innovation" and "Value-sensitive Design," our account of meaningful human control is cast in the form of design requirements. We identify two general necessary conditions to be satisfied for an autonomous system to remain under meaningful human control: first, a "tracking" condition, according to which the system should be able to respond to both the relevant moral reasons of the humans designing and deploying the system and the relevant facts in the environment in which the system operates; second, a "tracing" condition, according to which the system should be designed in such a way as to grant the possibility to always trace back the outcome of its operations to at least one human along the chain of design and operation. As we think that meaningful human control can be one of the central notions in ethics of robotics and AI, in the last part of the paper, we start exploring the implications of our account for the design and use of non-military autonomous systems, for instance, self-driving cars.
Copyright © 2018 Santoni de Sio and van den Hoven.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AI ethics; autonomous weapon systems; ethics of autonomous systems; ethics of robotics; meaningful human control; responsibility gap; responsible innovation in robotics; value-sensitive design in robotics

Year:  2018        PMID: 33500902      PMCID: PMC7806098          DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Robot AI        ISSN: 2296-9144


  1 in total

Review 1.  For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything.

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  Robots and AI as Legal Subjects? Disentangling the Ontological and Functional Perspective.

Authors:  Andrea Bertolini; Francesca Episcopo
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Diffused responsibility: attributions of responsibility in the use of AI-driven clinical decision support systems.

Authors:  Hannah Bleher; Matthias Braun
Journal:  AI Ethics       Date:  2022-01-24

3.  Transparency as design publicity: explaining and justifying inscrutable algorithms.

Authors:  Michele Loi; Andrea Ferrario; Eleonora Viganò
Journal:  Ethics Inf Technol       Date:  2020-10-20

4.  Tragic Choices and the Virtue of Techno-Responsibility Gaps.

Authors:  John Danaher
Journal:  Philos Technol       Date:  2022-03-30

5.  "Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road": an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems.

Authors:  Daan Van Cauwenberge; Wim Van Biesen; Johan Decruyenaere; Tamara Leune; Sigrid Sterckx
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.834

6.  Realising Meaningful Human Control Over Automated Driving Systems: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Filippo Santoni de Sio; Giulio Mecacci; Simeon Calvert; Daniel Heikoop; Marjan Hagenzieker; Bart van Arem
Journal:  Minds Mach (Dordr)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.339

7.  Accident Liability Determination of Autonomous Driving Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology and Its Impact on Public Mental Health.

Authors:  Yineng Xiao; Zhao Liu
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31

8.  Lethal autonomous weapon systems and respect for human dignity.

Authors:  Leonard Kahn
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-09-09

Review 9.  Human-centred design in industry 4.0: case study review and opportunities for future research.

Authors:  Hien Nguyen Ngoc; Ganix Lasa; Ion Iriarte
Journal:  J Intell Manuf       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 6.485

10.  Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic.

Authors:  Matthias Braun; Patrik Hummel; Susanne Beck; Peter Dabrock
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.