Jianmei Ling1, Panwen He2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu 226000, P.R. China. 2. Clinical Laboratory, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, P.R. China.
Ovarian cancer is a common gynecological malignant solid tumor, and it also exhibits the highest mortality of cancer of the female reproductive tract (1-3). The majority of patients are diagnosed at the advanced stage. With the advancement of technology, the treatment of ovarian cancer has been significantly improved in the past few years, however, the 5-year overall survival rate for patients with ovarian cancer is still low (4,5). Therefore, it is important to identify new targets for the treatment of ovarian cancer.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are highly conservative short non-coding RNAs that are 20-24 nucleotides in length and can post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression (6-9). miRNAs can mediate degradation or inhibit translation of mRNAs by directly binding to the 3'untranslated region (3'UTR) (10,11). A growing number of studies have demonstrated that the abnormal expression and function of miRNAs serves an important role in the pathogenesis of malignant disease (12,13). It has been reported that miR-205 can induce cell invasion by inhibiting transcription factor 21 in humanovarian cancer (14). Furthermore, miR-663 has been demonstrated to promote cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting TUSC2 in ovarian cancer (15). Cui et al (16) reported that miR-361-5p was downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and suppressed HCC proliferation and invasion through targeting VEGFA. Ma et al (17) demonstrated that miR-361-5p expression was associated with prognosis in patients with breast cancer. A recent study has indicated that miR-361-5p was upregulated in serous ovarian carcinoma (18). However, another study reported that miR-361-5p was downregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer (19). Therefore, the expression and role of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer is controversial, and further research is required.TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3) is a member of the TRAF family and is ubiquitously expressed in a number of tissues and cells, including in the brain, lungs, heart, spleen and liver (20,21). TRAF3 is currently considered to be a central regulator of the ischemic signaling cascade, including neuronal death, neuronal apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress (22). Through bioinformatics software analysis, the current study identified the binding sites between miR-361-5p and TRAF3. Therefore, it was hypothesized that miR-361-5p may affect ovarian cancer cell growth through regulating the expression of TRAF3.The aim of the present study was to explore the role and mechanism of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer cells.
Materials and methods
Clinical specimens collection
Humanovarian cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from 30 patients with ovarian cancer from Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. These specimens were stored in liquid nitrogen or at -80˚C for subsequent use. The experiment was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital. All patients were notified that their specimens would be used in the current research, and written informed consent was obtained from every patient.
Cell culture and transfection
Humanovarian cancer cell lines, SKOV3 and ES-2 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, and human ovarian surface epithelial cells (HOSEpiC) were purchased from the BeNa Cell Culture Collection (cat. no. BNCC340096). SKOV3 and ES-2 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C with 5% CO2. HOSEpiC cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% FBS.SKOV3 cells were transfected with inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, TRAF3-short-hairpin (sh)RNA, control-shRNA, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A period of 48 h after cell transfection, transfection efficiency was detected using reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was acquired using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in line with the manufacturer's protocol, and RNA was stored at -80˚C. RNA was subsequently reverse transcribed into complementary DNA using a reverse transcription kit (Vazyme), according to the manufacturer's protocol. RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Vazyme) following the manufacturer's protocol. The reaction conditions were as follows: 95˚C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification at 95˚C for 30 sec, 60˚C for 30 sec and 72˚C for 30 sec. U6 or GAPDH was used for normalization. The primer sequences for qPCR were as follows: U6 forward, 5'-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3' and reverse, 5'-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3'; GAPDH forward, 5'-CTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTC-3' and reverse 5'-GTAGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCT-3'; miR-361-5p forward, 5'-ATAAAGRGCRGACAGTGCAGATAGTG-3' and reverse, 5'-TCAAGTACCCACAGTGCGGT-3'; TRAF3 forward, 5'-GGACCGCGAGATGAGGAA-3' and reverse 5'-CGGTCAGTGTGCAGCTTTAG-3'. Additionally, gene expression was quantified using the 2-ΔΔCq method. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
Western blot analysis
Following treatment, cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and lysed with RIPA lysis solution (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) supplemented with protease inhibitors for 30 min. Cells were then centrifuged at 4˚C and stored at -20˚C. Equal amounts of protein were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (EMD Millipore). The membranes were blocked using 5% skim milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween for 2 h. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4˚C overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at room temperature for 2 h. The protein band was visualized using the ECL method (EMD Millipore). β-actin was used as the loading control for normalization.The primary antibodies used were as follows: Anti-TRAF3 (Cat. no. 61095; dilution rate: 1:1,000), anti-Bcl-2 (Cat. no. 4223; dilution rate: 1:1,000), anti-Bax (Cat. no. 5023; dilution rate: 1:1,000), anti-p-p65 (Cat. no. 3033; dilution rate: 1:1,000), anti-β-actin (Cat. no. 4970; dilution rate: 1:1,000) and anti-p65 (Cat. no. 8242; dilution rate: 1:1,000), and were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. The secondary antibody: Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Immunoglobulin G secondary antibody (Cat. no. 7074; dilution rate: 1:2,000) was also purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.
MTT assay
MTT reagent (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to assess cell viability. Cells were divided into five groups: Control (SKOV3 cells without any treatment); inhibitor control (SKOV3 cells were transfected with inhibitor control for 48 h); inhibitor (SKOV3 cells were transfected with miR-361-5p inhibitor for 48 h); inhibitor + control-shRNA (SKOV3 cells were co-transfected with miR-361-5p inhibitor and control-shRNA for 48 h); inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA (SKOV3 cells were co-transfected with miR-361-5p inhibitor and TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h). SKOV3 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2,000 cells/well and cultured for 48 h. Then, 20 µl MTT reagent was added into each well for an additional incubation for 4 h at 37˚C, and 150 µl DMSO was added into each well and plates were shaken for 15 min. The optical density (OD) values were read at 490 nm using a micro-plate reader. Cell viability (%) = (OD value of experimental group-OD value of the blank group)/(OD value of control group-OD value of the blank group) x100%.
Flow cytometry assay
Cell apoptosis was analyzed using an Annexin-V/propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis Detection kit. SKOV3 cells were plated in six-well plates at a density of 106 cells per well overnight. The next day, cells were transfected with inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA, or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA. Following transfection for 48 h, the cells were collected, centrifuged at a low temperature and high speed, and re-suspended in 100 µl of FITC-binding buffer. Subsequently, the buffer was added with ~5 µl ready-to-use Annexin V-FITC (BD Bioscience) and 5 µl PI. In the dark, cells were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Annexin V-FITC and PI fluorescence were assessed using a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The data was subsequently analyzed using FlowJo software (version 7.2.4; FlowJo LLC).
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The binding sites between TRAF3 and miR-361-5p were predicted using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/). To confirm the binding sites, a dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed. Luciferase reporter plasmids (psi-CHECK2) containing the wild-type 3'UTRs of TRAF3 and mutant 3'UTRs of TRAF3 were manufactured by TSINGKE BioTech. SKOV3 cells were co-transfected with the wild-type (WT) or mutant (MUT) 3'UTR luciferase reporter plasmids, and the miR-361-5p mimic or mimic control, respectively, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cells were harvested after transfection for 48 h, and the luciferase activities were measured using the dual-luciferase assay system (Promega Corporation) following the manufacturer's protocol. Firefly luciferase was used as the normalization control.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism was used for statistical analysis. The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments in triplicate. Differences between two groups were determined using a paired Student's t-test, and comparisons between multiple groups were performed using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey's test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer tissues and cells
To explore the role of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer, the expression of miR-361-5p was determined in ovarian cancer tissues and cancer cells using RT-qPCR. The RT-qPCR assay indicated that miR-361-5p was highly expressed in ovarian cancer tissues (Fig. 1A). The level of miR-361-5p was detected in a humanovarian clear cell carcinoma cell line ES-2 and a humanovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3. The results also demonstrated that compared with humanovarian epithelial cells HOSEpiC, miR-361-5p expression was upregulated in ES-2 and SKOV3 cells, and miR-361-5p expression was indicated to be most prominent in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 1B). SKOV3 cells were subsequently selected for further study.
Figure 1
miR-361-5p was u-regulated in ovarian cancer tissues and cell lines. (A) RT-qPCR assay was performed to detect the expression of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (B) RT-qPCR assay was performed to detect the expression of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer ES-2 and SKOV3 cell lines and human ovarian epithelial cells HOSEpiC. ##P<0.01 vs. adjacent normal tissues; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. HOSEpiC. miR, microRNA; RT-q, reverse transcription-quantitative.
TRAF3 was indicated to be a direct target of miR-361-5p
TargetScan was performed to analyze the potential target genes of miR-361-5p, and the predicted sequence analysis data indicated that TRAF3 was the target of miR-361-5p (Fig. 2A). To further verify this prediction, a dual luciferase reporter gene assay was performed, and the results demonstrated that miR-361-5p mimic significantly inhibited the luciferase activity of cells co-transfected with TRAF3-WT and miR-361-5p mimic. However, miR-361-5p mimic could not inhibit the luciferase activity of cells co-transfected with TRAF3-MUT and miR-361-5p mimic (Fig. 2B). These results indicated that TRAF3 was a direct target of miR-361-5p.
Figure 2
TRAF3 was direct target gene of miR-361-5p. (A) Interaction between miR-361-5p and 3'untranslated region of TRAF3 was predicted using microRNA target site prediction software. (B) Dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed to confirm the binding sites between HOSEpiC. (C) RT-qPCR assay detected the expression of TRAF3 at the mRNA level in ovarian cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. (D) RT-qPCR assay measured the mRNA expression of TRAF3 in HOSEpiC, ES-2 and SKOV3 cells. (E) Western blot analysis detected the expression of TRAF3 at protein level in HOSEpiC, ES-2 and SKOV3 cells. **P<0.01 vs. mimic control; ##P<0.01 vs. adjacent normal tissues; &P<0.05, &&P<0.01 vs. HOSEpiC. TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor 3; miR, microRNA; RT-q, reverse transcription-quantitative.
To determine the role of TRAF3 in ovarian cancer, a RT-qPCR assay was performed to detect TRAF3 mRNA expression in ovarian cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. A RT-qPCR assay indicated that TRAF3 was significantly downregulated in ovarian cancer tissues (Fig. 2C). Compared with HOSEpiC cells, TRAF3 expression was downregulated in ovarian cancer ES-2 and SKOV3 cells and TRAF3 expression was minimal in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 2D and E).
miR-361-5p negatively regulated TRAF3 expression in SKOV3 cells
SKOV3 cells were transfected with an inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, TRAF3-shRNA, control-shRNA, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA, or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-for 48 h. A RT-qPCR assay indicated that compared with the inhibitor control group, miR-361-5p inhibitor significantly decreased the expression of miR-361-5p in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 3A). The RT-qPCR assay and western blot analysis indicated that compared with the control-shRNA group, TRAF3-shRNA reduced the expression of TRAF3 at the mRNA and protein level in SKOV3 cells (Fig. 3B and C). Additionally, compared with the inhibitor control group, miR-361-5p inhibitor promoted the expression of TRAF3 in SKOV3 cells, and this increase was reversed by TRAF3-shRNA (Fig. 3D and E).
Figure 3
The expression of miR-361-5p and TRAF3 in SKOV3 cells. (A) RT-qPCR assay detected the expression of miR-361-5p in cells transfected with inhibitor control or miR-361-5p inhibitor for 48 h. (B) RT-qPCR assay and (C) western blot analysis measured the expression of TRAF3 in cells transfected with TRAF3-shRNA or control-shRNA for 48 h. (D) RT-qPCR assay and (E) western blot analysis detected the expression of TRAF3 in cells transfected with inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA, or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h. **P<0.01 vs. inhibitor control/control-shRNA; ##P<0.01 vs. inhibitor. miR, microRNA; TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor 3; RT-q, reverse transcription-quantitative; sh, short-hairpin.
Effect of miR-361-5p inhibitor on viability and apoptosis of SKOV3 cells
To further explore the effect of miR-361-5p inhibitor on cell viability and apoptosis of SKOV3 cells, flow cytometry and MTT assay were performed. MTT assay indicated that compared with the inhibitor control group, miR-361-5p inhibitor significantly reduced the viability of SKOV3 cells (Fig. 4A). The flow cytometry assay indicated that miR-361-5p inhibitor significantly induced SKOV3 cell apoptosis (Fig. 4B and C). Additionally, miR-361-5p inhibitor decreased Bcl-2 expression, increased Bax expression (Fig. 4D), and decreased Bcl2/Bax ratio (Fig. 4E). All of these changes were reversed using TRAF3-shRNA. The results demonstrated that miR-361-5p inhibitor decreased SKOV3 cell viability and promoted cell apoptosis.
Figure 4
miR-361-5p inhibitor decreased cell viability and promoted cell apoptosis in SKOV3 cells. SKOV3 cells were transfected with inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA, or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h. (A) MTT assay was used to detect cell viability. (B and C) Flow cytometry assay was used to detect cell apoptosis. (D) Western blot analysis detected the protein expression of Bcl-2 and Bax. (E) The ratio of Bcl2/Bax was calculated and presented. **P<0.01 vs. inhibitor control; ##P<0.01 vs. inhibitor. miR, microRNA; sh, short-hairpin; TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor 3.
Effect of miR-361-5p inhibitor on NF-kB pathway in SKOV3 cells
Western blot analysis revealed the expression of p65 and p-p65 in SKOV3 cells. Compared with the inhibitor control group, miR-361-5p inhibitor markedly decreased the expression of p-p65 protein and significantly reduced p-p65/p65 ratio in SKOV3 cells, and these changes were reversed using TRAF3-shRNA (Fig. 5A and B). Therefore, the role of miR-361-5p inhibitor in ovarian cancer cells may be associated with the NF-kB signaling pathway.
Figure 5
miR-361-5p inhibitor suppressed the expression of p-p65 in SKOV3 cells. SKOV3 cells were transfected with inhibitor control, miR-361-5p inhibitor, miR-361-5p inhibitor + control-shRNA, or miR-361-5p inhibitor + TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h. (A) Western blot analysis determined the protein expression of p-p65 and p65. (B) p-p65/p65 was calculated and presented. **P<0.01 vs. inhibitor control; ##P<0.01 vs. inhibitor. miR, microRNA; p, phosphorylated; sh, short-hairpin; TRAF, TNF receptor-associated factor 3.
Discussion
It has previously been demonstrated that miRNAs can serve as either an oncogene or tumor suppressor by directly or indirectly modulating cancer genes. In the current study, it was revealed that miR-361-5p was highly expressed in ovarian cancer tissues and cancer cell lines. The results of TargetScan and dual luciferase reporter gene assay identified TRAF3 as a direct target of miR-361-5p. Additionally, it was demonstrated that TRAF3 was downregulated in ovarian cancer tissues and cancer cell lines. To further determine the role of miR-361-5p and TRAF3 in ovarian cancer, SK-OV-3 cells were transfected with miR-361-5p inhibitor or/and TRAF3-shRNA for 48 h. The results indicated that miR-361-5p inhibitor significantly suppressed SK-OV-3 cell viability and induced cell apoptosis. These changes were reversed by TRAF3-shRNA.Ovarian cancer exhibits one of the highest mortality rates of all gynecologic malignancies. Currently, the combination of surgery and chemotherapy has improved the treatment of ovarian cancer. However, the successful complete cure rate of this disease is only 30% (23). The mechanism of occurrence and development of ovarian cancer remain largely undetermined, and consequently, the identification of a new target is required to treat ovarian cancer. There is increasing evidence that miRNAs serve an important role in the early diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and treatment of cancer (24-26). It has been reported that miR-145 serves as a tumor suppressor and as a potential diagnostic target in ovarian cancer (27,28). Salem et al (29) indicated that miR-590-3p promoted ovarian cancer development by targeting Cyclin G2 and FOXO3. Zhou et al (30) demonstrated that miR-183 was associated with the pathogenesis of OC. However, the role of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer remains largely unknown.A previous study indicated that miR-361-5p serves as a tumor suppressor, and was revealed to suppress breast cancer cell aerobic glycolysis and proliferation (17). Kanitz et al (31) demonstrated that miR-361-5p served a crucial role in humancutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. miR-361-5p has also been reported to inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation by targeting STAT6(32). Chen et al (18) indicated that miR-361-5p was upregulated in serous ovarian carcinoma. However, Ma et al (19) reported that miR-361-5p was downregulated in epithelial ovarian cancer. In the current study, it was demonstrated that miR-361-5p was upregulated in ovarian cancer tissues and cancer cell lines.In the present study, it was indicated that TRAF3 was a direct target of miR-361-5p. It has been previously reported that TRAF3 is responsible for encoding the TRAF protein (33). Additionally, TRAF3 is an important part in the TLR and RLH pathways and exerts a key role in IRF3 activation (34). TRAF3 is also associated with a number of other pathways (35). Rehei et al (36) demonstrated that TRAF3 was a target of microRNA-214 in humanosteosarcoma. In the present study, it was indicated that TRAF3 was downregulated in ovarian cancer tissues and cancer cell lines. miR-361-5p inhibitor significantly reduced the viability of SKOV3 cells and induced apoptosis. The results of the current study also demonstrated that miR-361-5p inhibitor could inhibit the NF-kB signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells, and this result suggested that miR-361-5p may be associated with the NF-kB signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. All the effects of miR-361-5p inhibitor on SKOV3 cells were reversed by TRAF3 silencing.In conclusion, miR-361-5p regulated the proliferation and apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells by targeting TRAF3 and may be a new potential therapeutic target for ovarian cancer. The current study is a preliminary study of the role of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer. To clarify the role of miR-361-5p in ovarian cancer, the role of miR-361-5p in other ovarian cancer cell lines required determination. The effect of miR-361-5p/TRAF3 on ovarian cancer also required investigation in vivo. Furthermore, the relationship between the expression of miR-361-5p/TRAF3 in patients with ovarian cancer and the clinical pathological features of the patients requires investigation in future studies.