Elisabet Capdevila1, María Rodríguez-Bailón2, Maria Kapanadze1, Mariona Portell3. 1. Escola Universitària d'Infermeria i Teràpia Ocupacional de Terrassa (EUIT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), C/de la Riba, 90, 08221 Terrassa, Spain. 2. Department of Physiotherapy (Occupational Therapy), Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Málaga (UMA), C/Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, 3, 29017 Málaga, Spain. 3. Department of Psychobiology and Methodology of Health Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus de Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Scientific evidence that supports the psychometric properties of the COPM as a tool to enable personalized care has been repeatedly shown. However, there is a lack of studies about its utility within the Spanish research community. AIM: This qualitative study seeks to ascertain the perceptions of professionals from social health centers, nursing homes, and Spanish rehabilitation services about the clinical utility of the COPM as a standardized instrument. METHODS: Thirty occupational therapists and physiotherapists in four focus groups discussed the experience of applying the COPM. The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) incorporated a multidimensional model of clinical utility based on the components of acceptable, appropriate, accessible, and practicable by the clients, professionals, and institutions. Results and Discussion. The results of the utility study showed that the COPM helped professionals and clients to gain significant involvement in the treatment process. The COPM contributed to the process of further goal setting, occupation-based, and client-centered, thus achieving considerable satisfaction from the clients that had treatment. The professional training and adaptation to the geriatric population were vital to this process. CONCLUSION: The COPM is a useful and viable tool for the institutions that are supportive of a client-centered approach in the Spanish context.
INTRODUCTION: Scientific evidence that supports the psychometric properties of the COPM as a tool to enable personalized care has been repeatedly shown. However, there is a lack of studies about its utility within the Spanish research community. AIM: This qualitative study seeks to ascertain the perceptions of professionals from social health centers, nursing homes, and Spanish rehabilitation services about the clinical utility of the COPM as a standardized instrument. METHODS: Thirty occupational therapists and physiotherapists in four focus groups discussed the experience of applying the COPM. The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) incorporated a multidimensional model of clinical utility based on the components of acceptable, appropriate, accessible, and practicable by the clients, professionals, and institutions. Results and Discussion. The results of the utility study showed that the COPM helped professionals and clients to gain significant involvement in the treatment process. The COPM contributed to the process of further goal setting, occupation-based, and client-centered, thus achieving considerable satisfaction from the clients that had treatment. The professional training and adaptation to the geriatric population were vital to this process. CONCLUSION: The COPM is a useful and viable tool for the institutions that are supportive of a client-centered approach in the Spanish context.