| Literature DB >> 33500503 |
Rosa Bellmann-Weiler1, Miriam Ladstätter2, Falko Schüllner2, Manfred Nairz3, Martina Zimmermann1, Anna-Maria Koller1, Silvia Blunder1, Helene Naschberger1, Werner Klotz1, Manfred Herold1, Sylvia Kerndler2, Martina Jeske2, David Haschka1, Verena Petzer4, Andrea Schroll1, Thomas Sonnweber1, Ivan Tancevski1, Gernot Fritsche1, Mariana E G de Araujo5, Taras Stasyk5, Lukas A Huber5, Andrea Griesmacher6, Igor Theurl1, Günter Weiss1.
Abstract
The diagnosis of COVID-19 relies on the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory specimens by RT-PCR. The pandemic spread of the disease caused an imbalance between demand and supply of materials and reagents needed for diagnostic purposes including swab sets. In a comparative effectiveness study, we conducted serial follow-up swabs in hospitalized laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients. We assessed the diagnostic performance of an in-house system developed according to recommendations by the US CDC. In a total of 96 serial swabs, we found significant differences in the accuracy of the different swab systems to generate a positive result in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, ranging from around 50 to 80%. Of note, an in-house swab system was superior to most commercially available sets as reflected by significantly lower Ct values of viral genes. Thus, a simple combination of broadly available materials may enable diagnostic laboratories to bypass global limitations in the supply of swab sets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33500503 PMCID: PMC7838421 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81782-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379