Literature DB >> 33500288

Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis.

Bilal Akhter Mateen1,2,3, Harrison Wilde4, John M Dennis5, Andrew Duncan2,6, Nick Thomas5,7, Andrew McGovern5,7, Spiros Denaxas2,3,8, Matt Keeling9, Sebastian Vollmer2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
DESIGN: Descriptive survey.
SETTING: All non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Acute (non-specialist) trusts with a type 1 (ie, 24 hours/day, consultant-led) accident and emergency department (n=125), Nightingale (field) hospitals (n=7) and independent sector secondary care providers (n=195). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two thresholds for 'safe occupancy' were used: 85% as per the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and 92% as per NHS Improvement.
RESULTS: At peak availability, there were 2711 additional beds compatible with mechanical ventilation across England, reflecting a 53% increase in capacity, and occupancy never exceeded 62%. A consequence of the repurposing of beds meant that at the trough there were 8.7% (8508) fewer general and acute beds across England, but occupancy never exceeded 72%. The closest to full occupancy of general and acute bed (surge) capacity that any trust in England reached was 99.8% . For beds compatible with mechanical ventilation there were 326 trust-days (3.7%) spent above 85% of surge capacity and 154 trust-days (1.8%) spent above 92%. 23 trusts spent a cumulative 81 days at 100% saturation of their surge ventilator bed capacity (median number of days per trust=1, range: 1-17). However, only three sustainability and transformation partnerships (aggregates of geographically co-located trusts) reached 100% saturation of their mechanical ventilation beds.
CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the first wave of the pandemic, an adequate supply of all bed types existed at a national level. However, due to an unequal distribution of bed utilisation, many trusts spent a significant period operating above 'safe-occupancy' thresholds despite substantial capacity in geographically co-located trusts, a key operational issue to address in preparing for future waves. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; health policy; intensive & critical care; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33500288      PMCID: PMC7843315          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  7 in total

1.  The implications of high bed occupancy rates on readmission rates in England: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Rocco Friebel; Rebecca Fisher; Sarah R Deeny; Tim Gardner; Aoife Molloy; Adam Steventon
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  The hospital bed: on its way out?

Authors:  John Appleby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-03-12

3.  Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model.

Authors:  A Bagust; M Place; J W Posnett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

4.  The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments.

Authors:  Peter C Sprivulis; Julie-Ann Da Silva; Ian G Jacobs; Amanda R L Frazer; George A Jelinek
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 5.  Clinical review: Emergency department overcrowding and the potential impact on the critically ill.

Authors:  Robert M Cowan; Stephen Trzeciak
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Type 2 Diabetes and COVID-19-Related Mortality in the Critical Care Setting: A National Cohort Study in England, March-July 2020.

Authors:  John M Dennis; Bilal A Mateen; Raphael Sonabend; Nicholas J Thomas; Kashyap A Patel; Andrew T Hattersley; Spiros Denaxas; Andrew P McGovern; Sebastian J Vollmer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Emergency contracting and the delivery of elective care services across the English National Health Service and independent sector during COVID-19: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Rocco Friebel; Jon Fistein; Laia Maynou; Michael Anderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Lived experiences of healthcare workers on the front line during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Kate Grailey; Adam Lound; Stephen Brett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The association between mechanical ventilator compatible bed occupancy and mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19: a national retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Harrison Wilde; Thomas Mellan; Seth Flaxman; Bilal A Mateen; Sebastian J Vollmer; Iwona Hawryluk; John M Dennis; Spiros Denaxas; Christina Pagel; Andrew Duncan; Samir Bhatt
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Machine Learning-Based Prediction of COVID-19 Mortality With Limited Attributes to Expedite Patient Prognosis and Triage: Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Riccardo Doyle
Journal:  JMIRx Med       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Experiences and concerns of health workers throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: A longitudinal qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Aleksandra J Borek; Caitlin Pilbeam; Hayley Mableson; Marta Wanat; Paul Atkinson; Sally Sheard; Anne-Marie Martindale; Tom Solomon; Christopher C Butler; Nina Gobat; Sarah Tonkin-Crine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mortality Analysis of Patients with COVID-19 in Mexico Based on Risk Factors Applying Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Aldonso Becerra-Sánchez; Armando Rodarte-Rodríguez; Nivia I Escalante-García; José E Olvera-González; José I De la Rosa-Vargas; Gustavo Zepeda-Valles; Emmanuel de J Velásquez-Martínez
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-05

7.  COVID-19 Vaccine Priority Strategy Using a Heterogenous Transmission Model Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Youngsuk Ko; Jacob Lee; Yeonju Kim; Donghyok Kwon; Eunok Jung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A national retrospective study of the association between serious operational problems and COVID-19 specific intensive care mortality risk.

Authors:  Harrison Wilde; John M Dennis; Andrew P McGovern; Sebastian J Vollmer; Bilal A Mateen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Trends in 28-Day Mortality of Critical Care Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the United Kingdom: A National Cohort Study, March 2020 to January 2021.

Authors:  John M Dennis; Andrew P McGovern; Nicholas J Thomas; Harrison Wilde; Sebastian J Vollmer; Bilal A Mateen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.296

10.  Specific nutrition and metabolic characteristics of critically ill patients with persistent COVID-19.

Authors:  Marina V Viana; Olivier Pantet; Mélanie Charrière; Doris Favre; Lise Piquilloud; Antoine G Schneider; Claire-Anne Hurni; Mette M Berger
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.