Sesilje Weiss1, David Taggart2,3, Ian Smith2,4, Kristofer M Helgen5,6, Raphael Eisenhofer7,8. 1. Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. 2. School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (Waite), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 3. FAUNA Research Alliance, Ltd, PO Box 98, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. 4. Zoos South Australia, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 5. Australian Museum Research Institute, 1 William St, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 6. Australian Research Council Centre for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. raph.eisenhofer@gmail.com. 8. Australian Research Council Centre for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. raph.eisenhofer@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Marsupials are born much earlier than placental mammals, with most crawling from the birth canal to the protective marsupium (pouch) to further their development. However, little is known about the microbiology of the pouch and how it changes throughout a marsupial's reproductive cycle. Here, using stringent controls, we characterized the microbial composition of multiple body sites from 26 wild Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (SHNWs), including pouch samples from animals at different reproductive stages. RESULTS: Using qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene we detected a microbial community in the SHNW pouch. We observed significant differences in microbial composition and diversity between the body sites tested, as well as between pouch samples from different reproductive stages. The pouches of reproductively active females had drastically lower microbial diversity (mean ASV richness 19 ± 8) compared to reproductively inactive females (mean ASV richness 941 ± 393) and were dominated by gram positive bacteria from the Actinobacteriota phylum (81.7-90.6%), with the dominant families classified as Brevibacteriaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Microbacteriaceae, and Dietziaceae. Three of the five most abundant sequences identified in reproductively active pouches had closest matches to microbes previously isolated from tammar wallaby pouches. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first contamination-controlled investigation into the marsupial pouch microbiota, and sets a rigorous framework for future pouch microbiota studies. Our results indicate that SHNW pouches contain communities of microorganisms that are substantially altered by the host reproductive cycle. We recommend further investigation into the roles that pouch microorganisms may play in marsupial reproductive health and joey survival.
BACKGROUND:Marsupials are born much earlier than placental mammals, with most crawling from the birth canal to the protective marsupium (pouch) to further their development. However, little is known about the microbiology of the pouch and how it changes throughout a marsupial's reproductive cycle. Here, using stringent controls, we characterized the microbial composition of multiple body sites from 26 wild Southern Hairy-nosed Wombats (SHNWs), including pouch samples from animals at different reproductive stages. RESULTS: Using qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene we detected a microbial community in the SHNW pouch. We observed significant differences in microbial composition and diversity between the body sites tested, as well as between pouch samples from different reproductive stages. The pouches of reproductively active females had drastically lower microbial diversity (mean ASV richness 19 ± 8) compared to reproductively inactive females (mean ASV richness 941 ± 393) and were dominated by gram positive bacteria from the Actinobacteriota phylum (81.7-90.6%), with the dominant families classified as Brevibacteriaceae, Corynebacteriaceae, Microbacteriaceae, and Dietziaceae. Three of the five most abundant sequences identified in reproductively active pouches had closest matches to microbes previously isolated from tammar wallaby pouches. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first contamination-controlled investigation into the marsupial pouch microbiota, and sets a rigorous framework for future pouch microbiota studies. Our results indicate that SHNW pouches contain communities of microorganisms that are substantially altered by the host reproductive cycle. We recommend further investigation into the roles that pouch microorganisms may play in marsupial reproductive health and joey survival.
Authors: G R Finlayson; D A Taggart; G A Shimmin; C R White; R Dibben; V Steele; M C J Paris; P D Temple-Smith Journal: Anim Reprod Sci Date: 2006-09-09 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Amnon Amir; Daniel McDonald; Jose A Navas-Molina; Evguenia Kopylova; James T Morton; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Eric P Kightley; Luke R Thompson; Embriette R Hyde; Antonio Gonzalez; Rob Knight Journal: mSystems Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 6.496
Authors: Luke R Thompson; Jon G Sanders; Daniel McDonald; Amnon Amir; Joshua Ladau; Kenneth J Locey; Robert J Prill; Anupriya Tripathi; Sean M Gibbons; Gail Ackermann; Jose A Navas-Molina; Stefan Janssen; Evguenia Kopylova; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Antonio González; James T Morton; Siavash Mirarab; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Lingjing Jiang; Mohamed F Haroon; Jad Kanbar; Qiyun Zhu; Se Jin Song; Tomasz Kosciolek; Nicholas A Bokulich; Joshua Lefler; Colin J Brislawn; Gregory Humphrey; Sarah M Owens; Jarrad Hampton-Marcell; Donna Berg-Lyons; Valerie McKenzie; Noah Fierer; Jed A Fuhrman; Aaron Clauset; Rick L Stevens; Ashley Shade; Katherine S Pollard; Kelly D Goodwin; Janet K Jansson; Jack A Gilbert; Rob Knight Journal: Nature Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nicole M Davis; Diana M Proctor; Susan P Holmes; David A Relman; Benjamin J Callahan Journal: Microbiome Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Siobhon L Egan; Casey L Taylor; Peter B Banks; Amy S Northover; Liisa A Ahlstrom; Una M Ryan; Peter J Irwin; Charlotte L Oskam Journal: Microb Genom Date: 2021-12
Authors: Siobhon L Egan; Casey L Taylor; Jill M Austen; Peter B Banks; Amy S Northover; Liisa A Ahlstrom; Una M Ryan; Peter J Irwin; Charlotte L Oskam Journal: Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis Date: 2021-09-28
Authors: Christina Næsborg-Nielsen; Raphael Eisenhofer; Tamieka A Fraser; Vicky Wilkinson; Christopher P Burridge; Scott Carver Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 4.047