Literature DB >> 33499986

Variation in gut bacterial composition is associated with Haemonchus contortus parasite infection of sheep.

David Piedrafita1,2, Andrew R Greenhill3,4, Md Abdullah Al Mamun1,2,5, Mark Sandeman2, Phil Rayment2, Phillip Brook-Carter2, Emily Scholes1, Naga Kasinadhuni6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the greatest impediments to global small ruminant production is infection with the gastrointestinal parasite, Haemonchus contortus. In recent years there has been considerable interest in the gut microbiota and its impact on health. Relatively little is known about interactions between the gut microbiota and gastrointestinal tract pathogens in sheep. Thus, this study was undertaken to investigate the link between the faecal microbiota of sheep, as a sample representing the gastrointestinal microbiota, and infection with H. contortus.
RESULTS: Sheep (n = 28) were experimentally inoculated with 14,000 H. contortus infective larvae. Faecal samples were collected 4 weeks prior to and 4 weeks after infection. Microbial analyses were conducted using automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. A comparison of pre-infection microbiota to post-infection microbiota was conducted. A high parasite burden associated with a relatively large change in community composition, including significant (p ≤ 0.001) differences in the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes following infection. In comparison, low parasite burden associated with a smaller change in community composition, with the relative abundances of the most abundant phyla remaining stable. Interestingly, differences were observed in pre-infection faecal microbiota in sheep that went on to develop a high burden of H. contortus infection (n = 5) to sheep that developed a low burden of infection (n = 5). Differences observed at the community level and also at the taxa level, where significant (p ≤ 0.001) in relative abundance of Bacteroidetes (higher in high parasite burden sheep) and Firmicutes (lower in high parasite burden sheep).
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals associations between faecal microbiota and high or low H. contortus infection in sheep. Further investigation is warranted to investigate causality and the impact of microbiome manipulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Firmicutes; Gut bacteria; Protective effect; Ruminant; Worm parasite

Year:  2020        PMID: 33499986      PMCID: PMC7807447          DOI: 10.1186/s42523-020-0021-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Microbiome        ISSN: 2524-4671


  63 in total

Review 1.  Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions.

Authors:  Muriel Derrien; Clara Belzer; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Similarity of the ruminal bacteria across individual lactating cows.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.331

Review 3.  The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view.

Authors:  Jose C Clemente; Luke K Ursell; Laura Wegener Parfrey; Rob Knight
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Fredrik Bäckhed; Peter Turnbaugh; Catherine A Lozupone; Robin D Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation.

Authors:  Nicola Segata; Jacques Izard; Levi Waldron; Dirk Gevers; Larisa Miropolsky; Wendy S Garrett; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Analyses of the microbial diversity across the human microbiome.

Authors:  Kelvin Li; Monika Bihan; Shibu Yooseph; Barbara A Methé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Calypso: a user-friendly web-server for mining and visualizing microbiome-environment interactions.

Authors:  Martha Zakrzewski; Carla Proietti; Jonathan J Ellis; Shihab Hasan; Marie-Jo Brion; Bernard Berger; Lutz Krause
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  The environment within: how gut microbiota may influence metabolism and body composition.

Authors:  A Vrieze; F Holleman; E G Zoetendal; W M de Vos; J B L Hoekstra; M Nieuwdorp
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Micah Hamady; Catherine Lozupone; Peter J Turnbaugh; Rob Roy Ramey; J Stephen Bircher; Michael L Schlegel; Tammy A Tucker; Mark D Schrenzel; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Bryan A White; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Transcript and blood-microbiome analysis towards a blood diagnostic tool for goats affected by Haemonchus contortus.

Authors:  Yonathan Tilahun; Jessica Quijada Pinango; Felicia Johnson; Charles Lett; Kayla Smith; Terry Gipson; Malcolm McCallum; Peter Hoyt; Andrew Tritt; Archana Yadav; Mostafa Elshahed; Zaisen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Bacterial communities in the gastrointestinal tract segments of helminth-resistant and helminth-susceptible sheep.

Authors:  Erwin A Paz; Eng Guan Chua; Shamshad Ul Hassan; Johan C Greeff; Dieter G Palmer; Shimin Liu; Binit Lamichhane; Néstor Sepúlveda; Junhua Liu; Chin Yen Tay; Graeme B Martin
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.