Daniela Rosado1, Marcos Pérez-Losada2,3, Ana Pereira2, Ricardo Severino4, Raquel Xavier5. 1. CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, 4485-661, Porto, Portugal. de.frosado@gmail.com. 2. CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, 4485-661, Porto, Portugal. 3. Computational Biology Institute, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, 20052-0066, USA. 4. Piscicultura Vale da Lama, Sapal do Vale da Lama, Odiáxere, 8600-258, Lagos, Portugal. 5. CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, 4485-661, Porto, Portugal. raq.xavier@cibio.up.pt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Important changes in microbial composition related to sexual maturation have been already reported in the gut of several vertebrates including mammals, amphibians and fish. Such changes in fish are linked to reproduction and growth during developmental stages, diet transitions and critical life events. We used amplicon (16S rRNA) high-throughput sequencing to characterize the skin and gill bacterial microbiota of farmed seabass and seabream belonging to three different developmental age groups: early and late juveniles and mature adults. We also assessed the impact of the surrounding estuarine water microbiota in shaping the fish skin and gill microbiota. RESULTS: Microbial diversity, composition and predicted metabolic functions varied across fish maturity stages. Alpha-diversity in the seabass microbiota varied significantly between age groups and was higher in older fish. Conversely, in the seabream, no significant differences were found in alpha-diversity between age groups. Microbial structure varied significantly across age groups; moreover, high structural variation was also observed within groups. Different bacterial metabolic pathways were predicted to be enriched in the microbiota of both species. Finally, we found that the water microbiota was significantly distinct from the fish microbiota across all the studied age groups, although a high percentage of ASVs was shared with the skin and gill microbiotas. CONCLUSIONS: We report important microbial differences in composition and potential functionality across different ages of farmed seabass and seabream. These differences may be related to somatic growth and the onset of sexual maturation. Importantly, some of the inferred metabolic pathways could enhance the fish coping mechanisms during stressful conditions. Our results provide new evidence suggesting that growth and sexual maturation have an important role in shaping the microbiota of the fish external mucosae and highlight the importance of considering different life stages in microbiota studies.
BACKGROUND: Important changes in microbial composition related to sexual maturation have been already reported in the gut of several vertebrates including mammals, amphibians and fish. Such changes in fish are linked to reproduction and growth during developmental stages, diet transitions and critical life events. We used amplicon (16S rRNA) high-throughput sequencing to characterize the skin and gill bacterial microbiota of farmed seabass and seabream belonging to three different developmental age groups: early and late juveniles and mature adults. We also assessed the impact of the surrounding estuarinewater microbiota in shaping the fish skin and gill microbiota. RESULTS: Microbial diversity, composition and predicted metabolic functions varied across fish maturity stages. Alpha-diversity in the seabass microbiota varied significantly between age groups and was higher in older fish. Conversely, in the seabream, no significant differences were found in alpha-diversity between age groups. Microbial structure varied significantly across age groups; moreover, high structural variation was also observed within groups. Different bacterial metabolic pathways were predicted to be enriched in the microbiota of both species. Finally, we found that the water microbiota was significantly distinct from the fish microbiota across all the studied age groups, although a high percentage of ASVs was shared with the skin and gill microbiotas. CONCLUSIONS: We report important microbial differences in composition and potential functionality across different ages of farmed seabass and seabream. These differences may be related to somatic growth and the onset of sexual maturation. Importantly, some of the inferred metabolic pathways could enhance the fish coping mechanisms during stressful conditions. Our results provide new evidence suggesting that growth and sexual maturation have an important role in shaping the microbiota of the fish external mucosae and highlight the importance of considering different life stages in microbiota studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bacteria; Dicentrarchus labrax; Microbiota; Sexual maturation; Sparus aurata
Authors: James J Kozich; Sarah L Westcott; Nielson T Baxter; Sarah K Highlander; Patrick D Schloss Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: W Zac Stephens; Adam R Burns; Keaton Stagaman; Sandi Wong; John F Rawls; Karen Guillemin; Brendan J M Bohannan Journal: ISME J Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Tamsyn M Uren Webster; Sofia Consuegra; Matthew Hitchings; Carlos Garcia de Leaniz Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jinlyung Choi; Fan Yang; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Erick Cardenas; Aaron Garoutte; Ryan Williams; Jared Flater; James M Tiedje; Kirsten S Hofmockel; Brian Gelder; Adina Howe Journal: ISME J Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: María Cámara-Ruiz; Isabel M Cerezo; Francisco A Guardiola; José María García-Beltrán; M Carmen Balebona; Miguel Ángel Moriñigo; María Ángeles Esteban Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-04-29
Authors: Morag Clinton; Adam J Wyness; Samuel A M Martin; Andrew S Brierley; David E K Ferrier Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.605