Literature DB >> 33499957

3D printing PCL/nHA bone scaffolds: exploring the influence of material synthesis techniques.

Amanda Zimmerling1, Zahra Yazdanpanah2, David M L Cooper3, James D Johnston2,4, Xiongbiao Chen2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that a number of parameters can influence the post-printing properties of bone tissue scaffolds. Previous research has primarily focused on the effect of parameters associated with scaffold design (e.g., scaffold porosity) and specific scaffold printing processes (e.g., printing pressure). To our knowledge, no studies have investigated variations in post-printing properties attributed to the techniques used to synthesize the materials for printing (e.g., melt-blending, powder blending, liquid solvent, and solid solvent).
METHODS: Four material preparation techniques were investigated to determine their influence on scaffold properties. Polycaprolactone/nano-hydroxyapatite 30% (wt.) materials were synthesized through melt-blending, powder blending, liquid solvent, and solid solvent techniques. The material printability and the properties of printed scaffolds, in terms of swelling/degradation, mechanical strength, morphology, and thermal properties, were examined and compared to one another using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Material prepared through the liquid solvent technique was found to have limited printability, while melt-blended material demonstrated the highest degree of uniformity and lowest extent of swelling and degradation. Scaffolds prepared with powder-blended material demonstrated the highest Young's modulus, yield strength, and modulus of resilience; however, they also demonstrated the highest degree of variability. The higher degree of inhomogeneity in the material was further supported by thermal gravimetric analysis. While scaffolds printed from melt-blended, powder-blended, and solid solvent materials demonstrated a high degree of micro-porosity, the liquid solvent material preparation technique resulted in minimal micro-porosity.
CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that specific techniques used to prepare materials influence the printing process and post-printing scaffold properties. Among the four techniques examined, melt-blended materials were found to be the most favorable, specifically when considering the combination of printability, consistent mechanical properties, and efficient preparation. Techniques determined to be favourable based on the properties investigated should undergo further studies related to biological properties and time-dependent properties beyond 21-days.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone scaffolds; Material synthesis; Nano-hydroxyapatite; Polycaprolactone; Three-dimensional printing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33499957      PMCID: PMC7836567          DOI: 10.1186/s40824-021-00204-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Res        ISSN: 1226-4601


  24 in total

1.  Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  K J Burg; S Porter; J F Kellam
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Biology of bone and how it orchestrates the form and function of the skeleton.

Authors:  D W Sommerfeldt; C T Rubin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomineralized porous composite scaffolds prepared by chemical synthesis for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors:  M G Raucci; V D'Antò; V Guarino; E Sardella; S Zeppetelli; P Favia; L Ambrosio
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Characterization of the flow behavior of alginate/hydroxyapatite mixtures for tissue scaffold fabrication.

Authors:  X Y Tian; M G Li; N Cao; J W Li; X B Chen
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 5.  Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  K Rezwan; Q Z Chen; J J Blaker; Aldo Roberto Boccaccini
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Mechanical properties of natural cartilage and tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Christopher James Little; Nahshon Kenneth Bawolin; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  In vitro analysis of biodegradable polymer blend/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  K G Marra; J W Szem; P N Kumta; P A DiMilla; L E Weiss
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-12-05

8.  Fabrication of three-dimensional polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite tissue scaffolds and osteoblast-scaffold interactions in vitro.

Authors:  Lauren Shor; Selçuk Güçeri; Xuejun Wen; Milind Gandhi; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Production of Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds with a Tailored Macro/Micro-Porous Structure, High Mechanical Properties, and Excellent Bioactivity.

Authors:  Jong-Woo Kim; Kwan-Ha Shin; Young-Hag Koh; Min Jin Hah; Jiyoung Moon; Hyoun-Ee Kim
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Bioprinting of Vascularized Tissue Scaffolds: Influence of Biopolymer, Cells, Growth Factors, and Gene Delivery.

Authors:  M D Sarker; Saman Naghieh; N K Sharma; Liqun Ning; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.682

View more
  12 in total

1.  3D-Printed PCL Scaffolds Coated with Nanobioceramics Enhance Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells.

Authors:  Nasrin Fazeli; Ehsan Arefian; Shiva Irani; Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi; Ehsan Seyedjafari
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-12-14

Review 2.  Conductive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Current State and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Damion T Dixon; Cheryl T Gomillion
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-12-21

3.  Suture Fiber Reinforcement of a 3D Printed Gelatin Scaffold for Its Potential Application in Soft Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Dong Jin Choi; Kyoung Choi; Sang Jun Park; Young-Jin Kim; Seok Chung; Chun-Ho Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Fabrication and Characterization of PCL/HA Filament as a 3D Printing Material Using Thermal Extrusion Technology for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Fengze Wang; Esma Bahar Tankus; Francesco Santarella; Nadja Rohr; Neha Sharma; Sabrina Märtin; Mirja Michalscheck; Michaela Maintz; Shuaishuai Cao; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 5.  3D Bioprinted Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State-Of-The-Art and Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Zahra Yazdanpanah; James D Johnston; David M L Cooper; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 6.  Hybprinting for musculoskeletal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jiannan Li; Carolyn Kim; Chi-Chun Pan; Aaron Babian; Elaine Lui; Jeffrey L Young; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Sungwoo Kim; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-08

Review 7.  Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views.

Authors:  Ali Malekpour; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

8.  Perforated Hydrogels Consisting of Cholesterol-Bearing Pullulan (CHP) Nanogels: A Newly Designed Scaffold for Bone Regeneration Induced by RANKL-Binding Peptides and BMP-2.

Authors:  Cangyou Xie; Michiko Satake-Ozawa; Fatma Rashed; Masud Khan; Masaomi Ikeda; Shunya Hayashi; Shinichi Sawada; Yoshihiro Sasaki; Tohru Ikeda; Yoshiyuki Mori; Kazunari Akiyoshi; Kazuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 9.  The application of 3D bioprinting in urological diseases.

Authors:  Kailei Xu; Ying Han; Yuye Huang; Peng Wei; Jun Yin; Junhui Jiang
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-08-02

10.  Etched 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone Constructs Functionalized with Reduced Graphene Oxide for Enhanced Attachment of Dental Pulp-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Austin J Bow; Thomas J Masi; Madhu S Dhar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.