Bruno C M Oliveira1,2, Maureen Murray1, Florina Tseng1, Giovanni Widmer3. 1. Department of Infectious Disease & Global Health, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, 01536, USA. 2. Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatuba, Brazil. 3. Department of Infectious Disease & Global Health, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA, 01536, USA. giovanni.widmer@tufts.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as "microbiota", play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many years, much less is known about the microbiota populating the intestinal tract of wild animals. RESULTS: The relatively large number of raptors admitted to the Tufts Wildlife Clinic on the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University campus provided a unique opportunity to investigate the bacterial microbiota in these birds. Opportunistic collection of fecal samples from raptors of 7 different species in the orders Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, and Falconiformes with different medical histories generated a collection of 46 microbiota samples. Based on 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA, large β-diversity values were observed. Many comparisons exceeded weighted UniFrac distances of 0.9. Microbiota diversity did not segregate with the taxonomy of the host; no significant difference between microbiota from Strigiformes and from Accipitriformes/Falconiformes were observed. In contrast, in a sample of 22 birds admitted for rehabilitation, a significant effect of captivity was found. The change in microbiota profile was driven by an expansion of the proportion of Actinobacteria. Based on a small number of raptors treated with anti-microbials, no significant effect of these treatments on microbiota α-diversity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of "meta-organism conservation", i.e., conservation efforts focused on the host and its intestinal microbiome has recently been proposed. The observed effect of captivity on the fecal microbiota is relevant to understanding the response of wildlife to captivity and optimizing wildlife rehabilitation and conservation efforts.
BACKGROUND: The microorganisms populating the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates, collectively known as "microbiota", play an essential role in digestion and are important in regulating the immune response. Whereas the intestinal microbiota in humans and model organisms has been studied for many years, much less is known about the microbiota populating the intestinal tract of wild animals. RESULTS: The relatively large number of raptors admitted to the Tufts Wildlife Clinic on the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University campus provided a unique opportunity to investigate the bacterial microbiota in these birds. Opportunistic collection of fecal samples from raptors of 7 different species in the orders Strigiformes, Accipitriformes, and Falconiformes with different medical histories generated a collection of 46 microbiota samples. Based on 16S amplicon sequencing of fecal DNA, large β-diversity values were observed. Many comparisons exceeded weighted UniFrac distances of 0.9. Microbiota diversity did not segregate with the taxonomy of the host; no significant difference between microbiota from Strigiformes and from Accipitriformes/Falconiformes were observed. In contrast, in a sample of 22 birds admitted for rehabilitation, a significant effect of captivity was found. The change in microbiota profile was driven by an expansion of the proportion of Actinobacteria. Based on a small number of raptors treated with anti-microbials, no significant effect of these treatments on microbiota α-diversity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of "meta-organism conservation", i.e., conservation efforts focused on the host and its intestinal microbiome has recently been proposed. The observed effect of captivity on the fecal microbiota is relevant to understanding the response of wildlife to captivity and optimizing wildlife rehabilitation and conservation efforts.
Authors: Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Christian Quast; Elmar Pruesse; Pelin Yilmaz; Jan Gerken; Timmy Schweer; Pablo Yarza; Jörg Peplies; Frank Oliver Glöckner Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Meagan L Dewar; John P Y Arnould; Lutz Krause; Phil Trathan; Peter Dann; Stuart C Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chava L Weitzman; Lisa K Belden; Meghan May; Marissa M Langager; Rami A Dalloul; Dana M Hawley Journal: PeerJ Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 3.061
Authors: Joanna Malukiewicz; Reed A Cartwright; Jorge A Dergam; Claudia S Igayara; Sharon E Kessler; Silvia B Moreira; Leanne T Nash; Patricia A Nicola; Luiz C M Pereira; Alcides Pissinatti; Carlos R Ruiz-Miranda; Andrew T Ozga; Adriana A Quirino; Christian Roos; Daniel L Silva; Anne C Stone; Adriana D Grativol Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 4.379